-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
el bloque es un Alphacool HF 14 Livingstone
-
I put mine with a Crossfire of 5770 and a somewhat old processor Q6600@3200 Mhz: Stock the Vgas:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us Oc the Vgas: 
Uploaded with ImageShack.us It's not bad at all for a 4 or 5 year old Proce. Regards.
-
Well, I put mine in, for now everything is in stock (later perhaps it will go with the micro to 4'2 GHz).
i5 2500K @ 3'3 GHz (stock)
ASUS ENGTX 460 DirectCU 1 GB (stock)
P3183
-
Well, I'm posting mine, everything is in stock for now (later on maybe it will go with the micro to 4'2 GHz).
i5 2500K @ 3'3 GHz (stock)
ASUS ENGTX 460 DirectCU 1 GB (stock)
P3183I see that score as a bit low.
I also have another computer with a gtx 460Phenom II X4 945 @ 3750 Mhz
Gigabyte GTX 460 Oc 1 gb (stock 715/900)
And I got P3419
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Updated drivers. Regards.
-
Yes. The values are perhaps a bit low, but it is also true that my graphics card, the stock values are also lower. (Stock 675 MHz/900 MHz). And it is true. I have not updated the drivers in a long time (they are the ones that came with the graphics card). I will try with the most current drivers to see what comes out. -
I just installed the latest drivers (uninstalling the old ones, of course) and what a boost the graphics card has given.With the new drivers, everything in stock
i5 2500K 3.3 GHz (stock)
ASUS ENGTX 460 1 GB (stock)
P3399The score of the entire test has gone up by more than two hundred points, without overclocking, just by updating the graphics card drivers.
-
I just installed the latest drivers (uninstalling the old ones, of course) and what a boost the graphics card has given.
With the new drivers, everything in stock
i5 2500K 3'3 GHz (stock)
ASUS ENGTX 460 1 GB (stock)
P3399The score of the entire test has gone up by more than two hundred points, without overclocking, just by updating the graphics card drivers.
I knew it could give it more score.
But it should surpass me, because the i5 is a much better micro than the phenom II X4 945.
Maybe it's because of the difference in Oc between the two.
Regards. -
I knew I could give it more score.
But I should surpass myself, because the i5 is a much better micro than the phenom II X4 945.
Maybe it's because of the difference in OC between the two.
Regards.That's true. Your graphics card, even though you have the stock values, its clock values are somewhat higher. Besides, I can see that you have your CPU OCed, while mine is still at stock for now.
I'll do that test later, but with the CPU at 4.2 GHz when I have a better cooler for this CPU.
But the PC is very new, I built it just three months ago and I prefer not to push the machine for now. Something I will do with the Core 2 Duo. -
It's true. Your graphics card, even though you have the values in stock, its clock values are somewhat higher. Besides, I can see that you have your CPU overclocked, while mine is currently in stock.
I'll do that test later, but with the CPU at 4.2 GHz when I have a better cooler for this CPU.
But the PC is very new, I built it just three months ago and I prefer not to push the machine for now. Something I will do with the Core 2 Duo.I still think that your equipment should give more performance. Reason?
My equipment has DDR 2 at 800 Mhz
The HT Link is 1000 Mhz, it's an Am2 board, and it doesn't take HT to 2000 like the Am3.
Pcie is 1.1
Anyway, I paid 45 € for the motherboard.
Regards. -
ATI Radeon HD 6850
Intel 2500K @ stock + 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz 9-9-9
3D Mark 2011: 3576Is it normal that it says the micro was at 2.7? Is this not a thread? I suppose it would go to 3.6 or so but it caught an intermediate multi due to the C-State.
PD: Stock GPU.
-
Nvidia GTX 560 OC (Stock)
Intel Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3,4 Ghz +4 Gb 1066 5-5-5
3D Mark 2011: 3904Nvidia GTX 560 OC ( 900-1075-1800 )
Intel Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3,4 Ghz +4 Gb 1066 5-5-5
3D Mark 2011: 4142 -
Watch this space, I just updated the first post, the list is already there!
-
well today they already gave me the graphics and soon I will put my test
Well I already put it and for the moment it gives me the following: 3515 to GPU 915/4200 stock (it is the O.C. version) and CPU E 6300@3500
say that it is provisional because I am in the process of installing the S.O. that I have it wrong
regards
-
Well well, let me send you one now.
here it goes.
-
Joer ferelxyx! With that rig you should have better results than I do with OC.
I don't need to tell you what needs to be changed…that bench is the graphical definition of a bottleneck. -
Bueno ahí dejo el mio no va mal para estar sin oc la grafica.
-
Edito I thought that the Obione was also an XX70, it's because of the processor that the result differs, as you are already putting your data in the grumetes form, otherwise the lisa is not worth anything.
-
Done! But I saw the Overclock list thing (#7) late and I messed up the table with so much CPU description. :rollani: :vayatela: -
For now it's all divided into 3 brands, does anyone have an MSI?
-
For now it's all spread out across 3 brands, does anyone have an MSI?
in a few days I'll put up a pic of an asus and possibly an evga, although now that I think about it if tecnho notices that I'll pass him in the rankings he's capable of intercepting my new graphics card :nono:
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Registrarse Conectarse