WPrime

[Bm4n]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Hayo me fio de ti pero no se ve un pijo xD

Pues el 920 es de los que mejor wprime dan, así que sacale el polvo Tecnho.

[Raesan]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Portátil AMD Athlon64 X2 QL-64 2.1GHz 45,693" / 1447,883"

[Raesan]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Por cierto, esto es lo que me sale en mi PC (Phenom II) con W7 Ultimate 32bits.

[krampak]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Prueba con 'ejecutar como administrador'.

[Raesan]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Gracias, funcionó. Lo curioso es que ya estaba en la cuenta de administrador.

[incrediboy]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

la cuenta de administrador no esta en "modo administrador", tonterias que tiene el windows. si no activas una opcion que hay escondida por ahi una cuenta de administrador no siempre funciona como tal. :nono:

[Raesan]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

AMD Phenom II X3 720 2.8GHz 20,069" / 627,428"

[Nemo]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Resultados del rendimiento del portátil.

Intel i5 2430M 2,4 Ghz - 19,484" / 612,522"

Un saludo

[Bm4n]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Wow da el doble de rendimiento frente a un Core 2 Duo, que máquinas estos Sandy y a ver como van los Ivy. A ver si logro hacer funcionar el wprime en OSX y pongo la de mi MBA.

[Nemo]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Yo he sido el primer sorprendido :fuckyea:, sospecho que parte de culpa la tendrá el HT y el Turbo.

Un saludo

[wanautentico]

Wprime with a Phenom II X4 945 @ 3600 - 11.719 sec/376.027 sec

Not bad, right? for a micro that cost me around 100 € and on top of that with DDR2.

Greetings.

[Franziskaner]

well my old 9950 without oc 2.6 and with oc 2.9

[Twikzer]

Here is mine Twikzer- Intel i7 3770K (Ivy Bridge) 3,5 GHz oc 4,6 Ghz - 6.042 s./ 185.988 s.

[wanautentico]

I put the result with an FX 8350 in stock @ 4000 Mhz with turbo core @ 4200

Wanautentico - FX 8350 (Vishera) 4,0@4,1 Ghz (Turbo Core) - 8.796" / 273.001"

Not bad for not having OC, then they said that the FX were bad...

In reality if you use all the cores the turbo core is at 4100 Mhz, if you use 4 cores or less it is at 4200 Mhz.
Regards.

[wanautentico]

FX 8350 result at 4300 with Asrock's XBost activated

Wanautentico - FX 8350 (Vishera) 4.0@4.3 Ghz (XBoost) - 8,359 / 258.719"

For the price it has, this micro performs pretty well, right?
Best regards

[Fassou]

Here is a sample of the performance of a modest i5 4570 running Turbo.

Fassou - Intel Core i5 4570 (Haswell) 3.2@3.6 Ghz (Turbo) - 10,301" / 324,379"

Salu2!

[Bm4n]

@wanautentico:

FX 8350 result @ 4300 with Asrock XBost Activated

32M - 8,359 sec
1024M - 258,719 sec

Put the result in the standard format, like Fassou, to copy it into the list, and if you can edit instead of posting several results in a row

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[Fassou]

I have a question about the categories, and it is that there is one that you call "Dual core", but the only one that appears in it is Raesan with a Phenom II x3, which if I'm not mistaken has 3 cores :troll:

Regards!

[Bm4n]

@Fassou:

I have a question about the categories, and it is that there is one that you call "Dual core", but the only one that appears in it is Raesan with a Phenom II x3, which if I'm not mistaken has 3 cores :troll:

Regards!

So as not to make more divisions, just like the FX8 will go as 4 core….

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[Fassou]

@Bm4n:

For not making more divisions, just like the FX8 will go as 4 cores….

;D