Review AMD RX 480 By Javisoft

[garfield]

Curious. With the fan at full blast, it draws less from the pcie and draws almost the same from the connector. In the end, it's going to be that those values are so disparate because of the poor cooling of the chip. I think the custom ones will be ahead in that matter, as has always happened to AMD with their heatsinks.
Every time I see more tests, it seems like a pretty decent graphics card for what it costs, and the time frame rate is sure to be improved with new drivers (or so I hope).

[Javisoft]

It is very curious, but the heatsink is a bit of a mess, they could have left an entrance from the back to get more air... The custom ones look good, but I fear that with the GPU at full capacity, they will see similar temperatures to what I have put with the fan at FULL (although with less noise of course), the OC will be another story XD. Best regards!!

[Javisoft]

Update with full oc data by air!!

[garfield]

I'm afraid of those pcie peaks, and the load on the 6-pin connector. I don't want it to load something from the source. But you don't even feel it.
The curious thing is that with that oc you haven't reached the consumptions of almost 200w that other pages put. It's to look at where they have failed, or in what equipment and environment it has been measured, because the consumptions that you have had are the ones I have seen in videos on youtube: between 150 and 165€ at full capacity.
The strange thing is that with those temperatures it hasn't made you throttling. Not everything is so bad in these AMD. If in the end they are going to be good and all.

[Javisoft]

I think the difference is in the ASIC, mine is almost 90% and according to what I have read, consumption is very closely linked to this in the 14 nm.

[garfield]

I've been looking, but I don't see any more asic data. What are the approximate normal asic values for these graphics?

[Espinetenbolas]

You don't have to suffer so much with the power consumption issue unless the card is pulling too much from the PCI-E because the cables can handle much more even if the power supply is a potato:

PCI Express Auxiliary Graphics Power Connectors - Power Supply 101: A Reference Of Specifications

If we talk about normal connectors, they can handle up to 8 amps and in the case of high-quality connectors, up to 12 amps.

Like I say, I don't understand why he distributed the load to 50% if, depending on the card, the consumption exceeds 150W.

[Javisoft]

I think I read about the asic topic on pcperspective, and as for the rest, the basis of GPU-z according to my asic is better than 96% of the cards that have used the program, or what is the same, there is only 4% with the same asic or better than mine.

So it would not be surprising that in some case they reach 200w without problems.

Regarding the rails and amps, logically it will depend on the source, but in my specific case each rail can hold up to 40A before the ocp trips.

If you want I can make a graph with the amps and volts per second XD.

Regards!!!

[Javisoft]

New update with photos, features and data!!!

[Fassou]

The first post was already a hit, so the next two are Summa Cum Laude

As a suggestion from the comfort of the couch :troll:, think if you might be more interested in the model of posting in parts, to improve the visibility of new contributions, and you save the trouble of reserving responses, being able to add the links to the continuations later.

Alright, alright I know... I'll shut up

[Javisoft]

Update with consumption and performance data of the Crimson 16.7.1!!!

[Javisoft]

New update with all the data under DX12 on the crimson 16.7.1, now I just have to put it through its paces and I'll finish the review!!!

[cobito]

What a beastly document you are creating :sisi:

[Javisoft]

It is the least that one should do when making a review, a complete analysis, what some websites do (that charge and dedicate themselves exclusively to it) is a bit laughable.

In my opinion, the fault lies with the reader for not demanding and swallowing such articles, but well, it doesn't rain to everyone's liking.

By the way, to say that the review has taken 81 hours of work.

Best regards!!!

[Sylver]

@Javisoft:

It's the least you have to do when you do a review, a complete analysis, what some websites do (that charge and dedicate themselves exclusively to it) is a bit laughable.

In my opinion, the fault lies with the reader for not demanding more and swallowing such articles, but well, it doesn't rain to everyone's liking.

By the way, to say that the review has taken 81 hours of work.

Best regards!!!

That's not paid... I would redefine the terms of economic supply of the forum and allocate a part as a salary for hardworking forum members of this level :troll:

Best regards!

[Javisoft]

I would be pm, at least so that you could give me the info to buy the 1060 and upload data to compare XD.

[garfield]

Soon I will try it on my computer, to see if what javisoft has told us is true

[Javisoft]

Garfield tell us, how has my girl been in your hands XD.

[Espinetenbolas]

There is a MOD-Bios to unlock the full potential of the card for those who may be interested:

AMD Radeon RX 480 Unlocked Air BIOS - Overclocking.Guide

**Package includes stock BIOS, unlocked BIOS and ATIFlash.

• TDP up to 225 W (+50 %)
• Voltage unlocked to 1.40 Volt
• Run the approoperiate.bat file as administrator to flash your card.

**
**

LinK: atiflash rx480.zip

The Bios has been used to set the card to 1700Mhz with LN2:

[YOUTUBE-HD]HYg123osc04[/YOUTUBE-HD]**

[Javisoft]

I saw it last week, when the girl comes back I will have anchors for the block and finish the tests XD.