-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Genetics(yo mismo), Explorer 6x, Windows XP, 1.60 - 1.69GHz 7.75 seconds, June 6, at 12:05:43
ranking: 41 out of 1002 testers
Todo a sido optimizar la ram con un programilla de esos, y minimizar la ventana.
Suerte -
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
krampak, Explorer 5x, Windows 95, 99 MHz or lower 145.23 seconds, June 7, at 02:20:55
ranking: 964 out of 1002 testers
eso en un Pentiu 166mhz… ahora probare en un P75 xD
PD: Orimenel, como has hecho en un 166? jejeMi 7,75 segundos a bajado a 6,41:)
He entrado en el Top 5 de los malos XDDDD
krampak(p75mhz), Explorer 5x, Windows 95, 99 MHz or lower 361.19 seconds, June 7, at 02:35:43
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
en que se basa la velocidad??? por cierto un 28.38 con mi mozilla querido y un 18 41 con el ie
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Se basa en el explorador y la CPU, aunque si optimizas la ram tb se gana… lo que no he probado es de overclockear la grafica, alguien sabe si baja alguna decima?
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Pues me sorprende el rendimiento:
9.42 seg con un tbird a 1333 sin tocar, dfi ak76-sn y 256 mb pc 2100 sin tocar
Un saludo:D
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Pos nada, retocando un poco con el mismo equipo 8.93 seg;)
Por cierto, enhorabuena krampack, estas entre los top5
Un saludo:D
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Publicado Originalmente por krampak
**Genetics(yo mismo), Explorer 6x, Windows XP, 1.60 - 1.69GHz 7.75 seconds, June 6, at 12:05:43ranking: 41 out of 1002 testers
Todo a sido optimizar la ram con un programilla de esos, y minimizar la ventana.
Suerte**A que programilla te refieres?
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
TweakXP
EL RamBuster no me furula, no se pq. -
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
noname, Explorer 5x, Windows 98, 99 MHz or lower 29.94 seconds, June 18, at 10:15:51
ranking: 527 out of 1002 testers
no se creo que eto va mal ia se que tengo el windows xungo pero tampoco es para que me de esos resultados con un pentium IV a 1800 Mhz
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Win2K y XP con Explorer 6 es bastante mas rapido que el 98 con el explorer 5… quizas sea la unica razon.
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Reflotiiiiing
Estaba mirando ramas y he encontrado ésta.
Ahi va mi resultado en el presente:
krampak, Explorer 6.x, Windows XP, 2.60-2.79GHz 4.94 seconds, May 5, at 14:00:44
ranking: 26 out of 502 testers -
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
vallekano, Firefox 1.x, Windows XP, 2.20-2.39GHz 6.94 seconds, May 5, at 14:21:06
ranking: 105 out of 502 testers -
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
noname, Firefox 1.x, Windows XP, 2.80-2.99GHz 10.72 seconds, May 6, at 12:53:29
ranking: 180 out of 502 testersno estoy tan mal !! es un p4 2.8, conexion de 2 mb
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
noname, Firefox 1.x, Windows XP, 4.00GHz 4.47 seconds, May 6, at 14:59:56
ranking: 16 out of 502 testersUn saludo.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Registrarse Conectarse