GeekBench Ranking - Top 60 HardLimit

[XaviJS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Mi Linux es 100% Desktop PC. I creo que el que esta por debajo mio tambien es un Desktop normal.

Yo lo dejaria tal qual esta; asi se ve claramente que SO rinde mejor en el momento que tengamos Hardware igual.

Talvez lo que podriamos ahcer es 2 clasificaciones:

Portatiles: MAC WIN LIN
Desktop: MAC WIN LIN

Saludos!

[FASerrano]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

La diferencia entre 32 y 64 bits es importante, por lo menos en Linux.
20 puntos de diferencia son bastantes puntos:

fran@FRAN-LINUX:~$ linux32 /home/fran/Geekbench2006-Linux/geekbench
Geekbench 2006 (build 242). Email geekbench@geekpatrol.ca with feedback.

System Information
Geekbench Version: Geekbench 2006 (build 242)
Geekbench Platform: Linux x86 (32-bit)
Geekbench Compiler: GCC 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
OS: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64 i686
Model: Linux PC (AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+)
Motherboard: Unknown Motherboard
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Processor ID: AuthenticAMD Family 15 Model 31 Stepping 0
Logical Processor Count: 1
Physical Processor Count: 1
Processor Frequency: 2478 MHz
Bus Frequency: 0 MHz
Memory: 1003 MB

Integer Performance
Emulate 6502
single-threaded scalar 89.6 (rate: 1.0, result: 169.4 MHz)
multi-threaded scalar 89.3 (rate: 1.0, result: 168.8 MHz)
Blowfish
single-threaded scalar 234.5 (rate: 1.0, result: 96.8 MB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 234.3 (rate: 1.0, result: 96.6 MB/sec)
bzip2 Compress
single-threaded scalar 192.4 (rate: 1.0, result: 30.0 MB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 203.4 (rate: 1.1, result: 31.5 MB/sec)
bzip2 Decompress
single-threaded scalar 288.8 (rate: 1.0, result: 107.4 MB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 242.0 (rate: 0.8, result: 87.2 MB/sec)

Floating Point Performance
Mandelbrot
single-threaded scalar 155.9 (rate: 1.0, result: 1.1 Gflops)
multi-threaded scalar 164.5 (rate: 1.1, result: 1.2 Gflops)
Dot Product
single-threaded scalar 235.9 (rate: 1.0, result: 1.2 Gflops)
multi-threaded scalar 234.3 (rate: 1.0, result: 1.2 Gflops)
single-threaded vector 221.5 (rate: 2.6, result: 3.1 Gflops)
multi-threaded vector 216.7 (rate: 2.6, result: 3.1 Gflops)
JPEG Compress
single-threaded scalar 124.0 (rate: 1.0, result: 11.5 Mpixels/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 119.2 (rate: 1.0, result: 11.0 Mpixels/sec)
JPEG Decompress
single-threaded scalar 116.7 (rate: 1.0, result: 19.4 Mpixels/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 107.7 (rate: 0.9, result: 17.8 Mpixels/sec)

Memory Performance
Read Sequential
single-threaded scalar 246.8 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.1 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 252.4 (rate: 0.5, result: 1.5 GB/sec)
Write Sequential
single-threaded scalar 299.1 (rate: 1.0, result: 2.3 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 297.4 (rate: 0.5, result: 1.1 GB/sec)
Stdlib Allocate
single-threaded scalar 268.8 (rate: 1.0, result: 9.5 Mallocs/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 245.1 (rate: 0.9, result: 8.7 Mallocs/sec)
Stdlib Write
single-threaded scalar 95.6 (rate: 1.0, result: 2.4 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 96.5 (rate: 0.9, result: 2.3 GB/sec)
Stdlib Copy
single-threaded scalar 130.5 (rate: 1.0, result: 1.4 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 135.9 (rate: 1.0, result: 1.4 GB/sec)

Stream Performance
Stream Copy
single-threaded scalar 255.0 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.2 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 252.8 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.2 GB/sec)
single-threaded vector 236.1 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.2 GB/sec)
multi-threaded vector 240.0 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.3 GB/sec)
Stream Scale
single-threaded scalar 260.8 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.0 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 267.2 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.1 GB/sec)
single-threaded vector 243.8 (rate: 1.1, result: 3.3 GB/sec)
multi-threaded vector 245.4 (rate: 1.1, result: 3.4 GB/sec)
Stream Add
single-threaded scalar 264.8 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.4 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 266.5 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.6 GB/sec)
single-threaded vector 260.9 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.6 GB/sec)
multi-threaded vector 262.3 (rate: 1.1, result: 3.7 GB/sec)
Stream Triad
single-threaded scalar 276.9 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.6 GB/sec)
multi-threaded scalar 273.5 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.7 GB/sec)
single-threaded vector 218.4 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.8 GB/sec)
multi-threaded vector 211.3 (rate: 1.0, result: 3.8 GB/sec)

Overall Score: 213.1

Submit results to geekpatrol.ca? [Y/n]
Submission failed.

PD: lo copio porque no me deja subirlo.

[asercamoyero]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Windows : http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15041

Linux: Coming soon… .... ....

[Forenaits]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

¿Dónde están los maqueros?

[Xevipiu]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Bueno, desde este medio dia ya he degado el equipo a 4Ghz para 24/7, despues de estar jugando toda la tarde, he vuelto a psar el bench

478.1
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15012

[Raistlin]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

No es una gran marca, pero bueno mi portátil no da para mas :nono: , es lo que hay :risitas: :

Windows: 49,5

Salu2

[albertpg]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Yo tengo un problema y es q con el PC de la firma me da 145. A mi novia, q tiene un P4 a 2.6 y 512 de RAM le da 172!!!

Como puede ser esto? :mad:

[rul3s]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

449.9 –->

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15133

[XRAYBoY]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Con la firma 158.2 - ver aqui
Soy la cuarta parte de un Core 2 Duo :verguen: [Pique Mode:ON]

[xavib]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

217.8 -> Me pongo 1º en los Macs y 2º en Portátiles con mi MacBook…

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15219

[rul3s]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

EHhh, actualizar estooo, que voy delante de krampak por 1ra vezz!!! xD

[packosoft]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Mi PC del curro :resaca: - 169'7
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15275

[Yorus]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

@packosoft:

Mi PC del curro :resaca: - 169'7
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15275

Hasta hace poco menos de un mes yo tenía un Celeron 433, así que no te quejes ;D

[XaviJS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Packo; este PIV es Northwood o prescott?? Yo en windows sacaba como 150 puntos o asi. Tienes el doble de ram pero no creo que afecte mucho tampoco.
Tampoco te puedes quejar que los PIV aun andan muy bien :D.

Saludos!

[packosoft]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

bueno, si ya sabes que es quejarse de vicio xDDD
es un prescott s775

[sml]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

A mi mi a64 3400+ me da 126p, me da hasta verguenza postear la captura x'D

[KrHonHoS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Bueno, pos ya me tocaba a mi 250.3 con el portatil y con ubuntu 6.1
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15312

Uy si me pongo primero en portatiles y en linux!!! Uy, packo, si te he dejao a la altura del betun con menos maquina :D:D:D:D DarkSide r00lz

SalU2
KrHonHoS

[packosoft]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

menos maquina? si tienes el mismo micro y misma memoria…
no te preocupes que quien rie el ultimo rie mejor :D:D:D:D:D

[KrHonHoS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

@packosoft:

menos maquina?

Claroooooo, la mia es mas pequeña (la maquina, mal pensaos) Piensa que esta es la primera pulida de la temporada, la siguiente sera en shanghai y la siguiente en monza y la siguiente en monaco…. sigo???

[XaviJS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Que no muera este bench! me gusta mucho, es muy buena idea. Lo mejor es que la primera pagina sea actualizada mas o menos frecuentemente asi se ve mas claramente :).

Voi a picarme con el kernel de Linux; intentare compilar i optimizarlo todo lo que pueda para sacarle jugo xDD.

Por cierto packo; no me fije en la D del informe de tu CPU en el geek. Por eso esa pregunta :P.

Saludos!