[Questions] Intel Core i5 2500k Vs 3570k
-
Hello friends! Now that the Ivy Bridge i5, i7 have arrived a few weeks ago. As you told me to wait for the arrival of the new processors to build a new computer, what do you think about the replacement of the i5 2500k? the i5 3570k!
-
-
Intel Core i5-2500K vs Intel Core i5-3570K | HD-Tecnologia
mas completa
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/333444-10-3570k-futureproof-2500ksaludos
Hola! lo siento pero con estos links no me quedo muy claro… haber si alguien me corrige..:fumeta:
en rendimiento son parecidos... pero segun entiendo hace una mejor gestion de la ram ( aunque sin grandes resultados si no vean mi post en el apartado memorias) tambien tiene el pci e 3.0 que ahora no sirve de mucho pero quizas en un tiempo si. ya que no tiene ninguna aceleradora potencia suficiente para aprovechar las caracteristicas. y se rumorea que son mas calientes los ivy
pero consumen menos W.asi que las opciones son el ivy por si a caso vienen aceleradoras pepino
o bridge y vamos a lo seguro...
algun iluminado? ^^gracias!
-
@DaPeMa I wouldn't replace a sandy with an ivy, it's silly because you won't notice much difference.
@capdas the thing comes down to: if you buy ivy now, if you already bought sandy don't change. And bridge are both, the name is appropriate because the architecture is really the same, only the memory controller changes which carries a bit more bandwidth the PCIE 3.0 and the type of manufacturing.
-
I also think the same thing. It's silly to change a 2500K for a 3570K. There is hardly any difference between a 2500K and a 3570K. The only thing that changes is the integrated GPU which instead of being HD3000 is HD4000 and 100 MHz of frequency more, but it's silly if you use a decent graphics card.
Also, I understand that the Ivy Bridge get hotter than the Sandy Bridge.
-
Helloo!! I understand you, but if for example I put a modern motherboard and later I want to upgrade it by putting a more powerful graphics card (Kepler, pci 3.0), DDR3 memory above 2100 Mhz, etc., I won't have to upgrade the PC again. Do you understand what I mean??
-
Holaa!! I understand you, but if for example I put a modern card and later I want to upgrade it by putting a more powerful graphics card (Kepler, pci 3.0), ddr3 memory over 2100 Mhz. etc, I won't have to upgrade the pc again. Do you understand what I mean??
I understand you perfectly… I'd rather sacrifice a few degrees in exchange for a day not having to cry because you don't have a pci e 3.0
do we know if they will release more ivi bridge cpus with a much higher performance or are they already almost at the ceiling of the platform?
-
Holaa!! I understand you, but if for example I put a modern motherboard and later I want to upgrade it by putting a more powerful graphics card (Kepler, pci 3.0), ddr3 memory at more than 2100 Mhz. etc, I won't have to upgrade the pc again. Do you understand what I mean??
if the motherboard you buy has PCI 3.0 supports ddr3 memory at 2100 and etc NO in the not too distant future you will not have to upgrade the motherboard.
but sooner or later you will have to upgrade (if you want to be up to date, of course) and that in this world is every year :troll: -
if the motherboard you buy has PCI 3.0 supports DDR3 memory at 2100 and etc NO in the not too distant future you won't have to upgrade the board.
but sooner or later you'll have to upgrade (if you want to be up to date, of course) and in this world that's every year :troll:I think that upgrading now with an affordable budget, is to guarantee yourself for the future in a few years, that is, if you get boards with pci 3.0, sata3, and ram slots compatible to more than 2100mhz that are well priced. That way you won't have to start from scratch again, because this hardware world is a pain in the ass.
-
I understand you perfectly… I would rather sacrifice a few degrees in exchange for a day not having to cry because you don't have a pci e 3.0
do we know if they will release more cpus ivi bridge with a much higher performance or are they already almost at the ceiling of the platform?
I also think the same, otherwise later you will have to upgrade to the big one, this way you will be more or less up to date when you want to put pieces that are better priced. I don't know much about these topics either, but as it has already happened to me in some cases, it's about getting pieces that face the future at a good price, and little by little go putting improvements. I don't know if there will be more Ivy, but well, we'll see, I think that for gaming an Ivy i5 3570k is more than enough, it's a little more advanced than the i5 2500k with about 30 euros more, that is, it's hotter, well, a good fan for 50 euros and fixed, hehe
-
I also think the same, otherwise later it will be necessary to upgrade to a big one, this way you will be more or less up to date when you want to put pieces that are better priced. I don't know much about these topics either, but as it has happened to me in some cases, it's about getting pieces that face the future at a good price, and little by little keep putting improvements. I don't know if more Ivy will come out, but well, we'll see, I think that to play with an Ivy i5 3570k is more than enough, it's a little more advanced than the i5 2500k with about 30 euros more, that is, it's hotter, well, a good fan for 50 euros and it's fixed, jajaja
What increases the price of the micro by 50 euros… fixed... excuse my irony, but as you say it sounds more like a joke than anything else "50 euros and fixed"... damn, that means that if the micro, for example, is worth 222€, we are already talking about almost 300€.
That doesn't mean that I don't recommend a good disipa, but because you want to put it or you want to do overclocking, etc., but not just because.
And I also think it's silly, they are practically the same micro with almost no performance differences, more or less the same overclocking, an integrated graphics that whoever buys that micro, will probably have a good dedicated graphics card, the motherboards that you buy nowadays, for the most part, have PCIe 3, sata3, etc... that the micro is a 2500k, it doesn't affect me at all in the future (but nothing, nothing) when updating, it will bother me more to update the constant changes of Intel's socket, I assure you. Add to that that PCI3, for now, is a big nonsense, when a PCI 1.1 16X, if you think about it, can penalize about 1% in those more powerful graphics... let me tell you that I just tested a CFx with 2 7770 (which is true that they are not high-end, they are mid-range), on a motherboard with a PCI 1.1 16X/4X... and the performance is affected by 1, or 2% at most (if you push it, little more), and we are talking about a PCIe 1.1 4x, not 16x.
I think everyone knows perfectly well, that it's hard to saturate a PCI 2 or even 1.1 since they came out, as to justify having pcie 3
Regards.
-
interesting reflote after almost 8 months ;D
greetings -
Things to not focus on
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Registrarse Conectarse