Beautiful photos

[Franziskaner]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

la verdad es que no es una foto guapa , es mas bien una foto de el curro , es mas bien una foto que demuestra lo consumistas que podemos llegar a ser , 2 semanas hemos tardado en montarlo mas otras tantas en fabricarlo , y durara ….
:llorar:

!

[kalevala]

dafuq is this thread?

[Franziskaner]

@kalevala:

dafuq is this thread?

a site where you can hang photos and comment on them?

some photos from a town in castilla

!
this is the one I like the least, but it makes sense considering the mayor.

!
barcelona at night (on a stormy night)

!

!
cats

!

!

!

!
magnets

!

and for today, that's enough.

regards

[Franziskaner]

@Franziskaner:

well I was looking for a photo to put on the desktop (looking through the photos I took and the rest of the group) and I saw some very beautiful ones :troll: and I thought why not a branch for the photos commenting on what and how …..

data

!
panasonic DMC-FZ28
coming down from the Thoumasset
regards

it seems I uploaded the link ;D

regards

[cobito]

First of all, I must say that all the images are ruined by the infernal noise they have. You should learn how to play with the iso and shutter speeds because some scenes are static and there is no reason not to use high speeds.

First photo: the composition is not good. What do you want to show: the square, the arcades, the car with half a license plate…? It seems like it was taken while you were passing by, without having looked for a good spot. On the other hand, it is poorly framed although if you took it in an improvised way it is normal.

Second photo: poorly framed, dark, blurry, inadequate white balance and questionable subject. What is your goal with this image?

Third photo: This time the framing is better, but it is not clear what you want to show. Maybe the contrast of tones between the sky and the facades? The scene is quite ugly: some blocks of housing.

Fourth photo: Once again you fail in the framing. Also your camera has a pretty bad dynamic range. Maybe you should have chosen to blow out the background and illuminate the rest of the scene but it must be recognized that with such a limited camera it would have been difficult to get a good photo there.

Cat photos: they are simply photos of cats. They have nothing. Maybe the first one, if your camera did not put in so much noise, the chromatic aberration were not so pronounced due to the poor optics and it was well framed, with a little post-processing it could have been a "cute" photo.

Photo of magnets: it is the typical photo "I am going to take in black and white the shadow of the rocking chair while the sun rays enter through the window and are reflected in the ambient dust giving the ethereal passage of time to understand". Too bad your camera was not able to capture the shadows and reflections. A good photo to sell the magnets on eBay.

Photo of the frog: it has potential. Put filters on it and it will be an acceptable photo.

[Tecnho]

I also have magnets that I sell on ebay version bilbao :ugly:

[Franziskaner]

thanks for the criticism ;D
that's what the branch is for, to comment on photos, cameras and other things.
the 1st one I wanted to take the square, which is very difficult with traffic and too many people (it's the main square)
the 2nd one tests without flash and at a certain distance
the 3rd one man …. barcelona is barcelona, it has blocks and it's no fun to take a photo of a lightning storm with nothing to illuminate (I also have photos of the sky only, but the intensity of the storm is not appreciated)
the 4th one the framing was obligatory if I wanted to center Tibidabo, the roof is collateral damage ;D
cats, considering that they don't stop scratching or pawing I'm satisfied
and of the four I prefer the second one.
magnets I need a macro ;D
toad I think I used the AI mode so it's not worth much
regards

[cobito]

@Franziskaner:

esta es la que menos me gusta, pero es lógico teniendo en cuenta a el alcalde.

!

@Franziskaner:

y de las cuatro prefiero la segunda.

The second one is the worst by far. What do you see as special about it?

@Franziskaner:

sapo creo que use el modo IA por tanto no vale gran cosa

That explains why it is technically correct.

[Franziskaner]

it's the one I like the least because of what it represents, as a photo or as a way of taking the photo it would have been better to use a tripod and play with the exposure but ….. I didn't have a tripod, nor a place to lean on. In any case, I'm happy with the photo, because I got the "natural" light, the church is lit with yellow halogens and using flash gives white marble, so the photo would be falsified.

the second one because it has the most real colors and everything is on the same plane, cat cushion sofa wall.

I wasn't up for doing tests with a model that jumps ;D

regards

[Bm4n]

@Franziskaner:

sapo creo que use el modo IA por tanto no vale gran cosa

:facepalm:
A ver si nos das unas pequeñas lecciones de fotografía que parece que nos hacen falta.

[Franziskaner]

@Bm4n:

:facepalm:
Maybe you can give us some small lessons on photography, as we seem to need them.

First, some lessons on reading, please. Read everything and don't take things out of context

[Bm4n]

@Franziskaner:

First some lessons in reading, to. Read everything and not take things out of context

You make it worse for me, but I think it's fine to start where you need to, go ahead master!