-
@xevipiu how is it that the 4790K performs better than the 7700k? Is it all because of the memory? Also with single stage, it takes guts to be the best result xD
Haswell 4790K @ 5.85Ghz 1.58V (100x58) 1100Mhz @ 9-10-10-38 (Single Stage) -> 13,719''
Kaby Lake 7700k @ 5.86Ghz 1.76V (101x58) 911Mhz @ 12-12-12-28 (Double Stage) -> 14,025''
Ivy Bridge 3770K @ 6.09Ghz 1.86V (103x59) 927Mhz @ 7-10-8-26 (LN2) -> 13,946'' -
Cofee Lake 8350K @ 5.2Ghz 1.32V (100x52) 1200Mhz @ 12-13-13 (RL) -> 16,126''
-
A symbolic result with the 8700k, too bad I didn't remember to set it to 6.1ghz
-
@krampak said in Super PI Test (The 30 Fastest PCs on HardLimit):
@xevipiu how is it that the 4790K performs better than the 7700k? Is it all because of the memory? Also, with single stage, it takes guts for it to be the best result xD
Haswell 4790K @ 5.85Ghz 1.58V (100x58) 1100Mhz @ 9-10-10-38 (Single Stage) -> 13,719''
Kaby Lake 7700k @ 5.86Ghz 1.76V (101x58) 911Mhz @ 12-12-12-28 (Double Stage) -> 14,025''
Ivy Bridge 3770K @ 6.09Ghz 1.86V (103x59) 927Mhz @ 7-10-8-26 (LN2) -> 13,946''Because of the operating system being used, and because of the memory
SuperPi 2m should be used under XP with maxmem set to 600mb
Under W7 or W10 it's pathetic the clock for clock it generates without lowering the Maxmem
-
I leave something symbolic
-
@krampak With the "Single Stage" at -53º, which the other day broke the Klinxon (Thermal protector of one of the compressors, until I get the Klinxon and a new specific relay, I can't use it, anyway think that it would be around 6.6-6.7Ghz minimum for the SuperPi
-
Good chip that 8700k. You'll come back with the double results, although I doubt anyone here will take the top away from you xD
-
I updated the i3 to something with a higher frequency (although this time there was no way to lower the memory case, I don't know why).
-
@krampak said in Super PI Test (The 30 fastest PCs on HardLimit):
I updated the i3 to something with more frequency (although this time there was no way to lower the memory cas, I don't know why).
Set the Uncore to x50, only activate 2 cores, give it affinity to core 1, Core 0 is for the system, give 1.5vdimm to the memory and try to boot at least to 3000/3200 at CAS15. not to mention more than 3600
-
@xevipiu I'll keep that in mind for another occasion.
-
Resuscitating the branch... xD and breaking a 4-year record, here's a decent laptop, 15W at 1.8Ghz, 4Ghz in single thread and in the 4 threads I think it stayed at 2.5Ghz:
Kaby Lake 8550U @ 4.00Ghz 1.2V (100x40) 665Mhz @ 10-10-10-28 (Air) -> 21,776"
-
You have bitten me.
7300HQ @ 3.50GHz 0.913V (100x35) 1200 @ 18-17-17-39 (Air) -> 24,324''
-
An HP Omen has passed through my hands (it's already a couple of years old), it lacks top speed to take the record:7700HQ @ 3.80GHz (100x38) 1.06V 1200 @ 17-17-17-39 (Air) -> 22,750''
-
I resurrected the thread and my own account after a lot of years
. I attached the score of a team that I have put together these days with parts that I had around the house and others bought at eBay and Wallapop auctions: x5670 2,93Ghz @ 4,08Ghz (170x24) 1.25V DDR-3 1700Mhz @ 11-11-11-30 (Liquid) -> 22,911s 
-
Intel's record is 5 years old already
-
I have slightly optimized the overclock (more speed and less voltage) and I have slightly improved my previous score: x5670 2,93Ghz @ 4,27Ghz (178x24) 1.225V DDR-3 **1780Mhz** @ **11-11-11-30** (Liquid) -> **21,517s**
-
Here's a new entry... significantly improving the Top 1 of laptops
it's an HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7.i7 10540U @ 4.90GHz (100x49) 665 @ 10-10-10-28 (Air) -> 17,818''
-
And there improving the previous one... king's gift to my wife 1- krampak - Core i7 10870H @ 5.0Ghz -> 17,355''
-
Hello!!
Changing my old computer for the new AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.
The result is with stock values of cpu/memory/motherboard in a new Win10 installation and with the drivers/software of the hardware.
What a difference in times!!
-
@ Pablus77 Congratulations on the time! It was about time to put a new top1 in AMD jajaja 1Ghz less than the first generation Ryzen and equal time, not bad!
