• Portada
    • Recientes
    • Usuarios
    • Registrarse
    • Conectarse

    The misunderstanding in the consumption of the RTX 4090

    Programado Fijo Cerrado Movido Tarjetas Gráficas
    5 Mensajes 5 Posters 75.1k Visitas 1 Watching
    Cargando más mensajes
    • Más antiguo a más nuevo
    • Más nuevo a más antiguo
    • Mayor número de Votos
    Responder
    • Responder como tema
    Accede para responder
    Este tema ha sido borrado. Solo los usuarios que tengan privilegios de administración de temas pueden verlo.
    • Portada HLP Desconectado
      Portada HL
      Última edición por

      The RTX 4090 has unnecessarily large dimensions due to a misunderstanding between Nvidia and the assemblers. Nvidia thought the graphics card would consume 600W but when switching from Samsung's 8nm process to TSMC's 4nm, the consumption has been reduced to 450W.

      View entry

      1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
      • _Neptunno__ Desconectado
        _Neptunno_ MODERADOR
        Última edición por

        But how can they make such a mistake! Don't they test the GPU after the process change?...it seems like a joke, seriously how can they miss that “small” detail of the consumption from 600w to 450w before starting to design and prepare the heat sinks. In the end, consumers pay for this because the more the assemblers spend, the more they will pass it on to the end user.

        1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 2
        • palotesP Desconectado
          palotes
          Última edición por

          Miracle! Comments are working again. These people think they are still on top of the crypto world and think they will sell any mess. At least it has been a mistake that does not harm performance because if it had been the other way around it would have been funny. So, some careless messes. I would have to buy shares of ketchup manufacturers because they will need tons to swallow the GPUs that they will not sell.

          1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
          • defaultuserD Desconectado
            defaultuser Veteranos HL
            Última edición por defaultuser

            I don't think the problem was that they didn't try them out first or something like that, I imagine they would have already designed everything, manufactured and paid and etc by the time they changed the consumption, that is, they had to start all over again and throw away what they already had manufactured, they could even have PCBs and everything who knows.
            And that's in the case that the issue is as they paint it and the misunderstanding isn't really from the press.

            The bad thing is that this makes them even more expensive unnecessarily, because in the technical part there's no problem, that they come oversized in PCBs and heatsink? well, that's wonderful, the only thing missing was that they also came oversized in the power circuit.... massive overclocking that I'm going to do!!

            Ryzen 5 3600 - Tuf B550 pro - 2x 8g 3600c18 - Strix rtx 2060 - M2 1TB

            ClipperC 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
            • ClipperC Desconectado
              Clipper @defaultuser
              Última edición por

              Let's look on the bright side.
              They will be very fresh ?
              Best regards

              1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post

              Foreros conectados [Conectados hoy]

              0 usuarios activos (0 miembros y 0 invitados).
              febesin, pAtO,

              Estadísticas de Hardlimit

              Los hardlimitianos han creado un total de 543.5k posts en 62.9k hilos.
              Somos un total de 34.9k miembros registrados.
              roymendez ha sido nuestro último fichaje.
              El récord de usuarios en linea fue de 123 y se produjo el Thu Jan 15 2026.