Problems with the process when upgrading the vramm

[jero30]

Hello, I introduce myself to the forum, which is very good by the way.

Well, my doubt is that I understand that in the i7 you can't increase the vram to more than 1.65, because you overload the processor's controller, is that true? I have an i7 3820 lga 2011
The motherboard is a RAF and the memory is a ripjawsZ 2133@2240 with latencies 9-10-11-28-1t@1.7v
How do you see it, do you advise me something, am I at risk like this?
I leave you a capture of the Aida so that you tell me if I should change something, but what worries me the most is the ram if it will hold with that voltage and the micro issue.
Thanks first and foremost and keep going with this good forum. Regards

http://fotos.subefotos.com/9d9a8630430a1912eb0a580b8a954debo.png

http://fotos.subefotos.com/7ee9d37ad03bcb31bb1307127b3c8e77o.png

[jero30]

hello can you help me thank you

[Fassou]

Intel says that exceeding a voltage of 1.65V in the memories degrades the memory controller (which is inside the processor).

The ideal is to buy memories that comply with the DDR3 standard, and work at 1.50V, so you can overclock them, helping them with slight voltage increases.

Salu2!

[jero30]

@Fassou:

Intel says that exceeding a voltage of 1.65V in the memories degrades the memory controller (which is inside the processor).

The ideal is to buy memories that comply with the DDR3 standard, and work at 1.50V, so you can overclock them, helping them with slight voltage increases.

Salu2!

hello friend, so you think I should lower them to 1.65 and increase latencies, right?

I thought that this only happened with Nehalem and not with SB-E, because in fact, VRAM is recommended at 1.65.

I'm asking because some say that this is not decisive in these processors, it was only in the Nehalems, and I've seen some say it's safe.

I've looked at what you said about voltage on the Intel page but I can't find it.

There would be a lot of risks leaving it like this... I'm doing very well, the PC has been on for three days now, doing everything, and not a single problem. Thanks for your response, buddy.

[Fassou]

In this article from XbitLabs, they comment that "in LGA2011 as in LGA1155, exceeding those 1,65V is not safe", but in the end the micro is yours.

Salu2!

@X:

To ensure stability of the system at higher memory frequencies, you may need to increase the VTT voltage on the memory controller or the VCCSA voltage on the processor system agent, or even on both. Overclocker memory makers recommend using pretty high settings for these voltages, and sometimes they even record them in the modules XMP profiles. They really help a lot during overclocking. However, during our conversations with Intel we managed to find out that only the increase to 1.1 V on VCCSA and to 1.2 V on VTT may be considered “safe” for everyday use in 24/7 mode. Moreover, you should also keep in mind the recommendation not to exceed 1.65 V for the memory voltage, otherwise, it may stimulate degradation of the memory controller and untimely death of your processor. However, you can almost always reach DDR3-2133 frequency even without using the “risky” settings.

[jero30]

@Fassou:

In this article from XbitLabs, they comment that "in LGA2011 as in LGA1155, exceeding those 1,65V is not safe", but in the end the micro is yours.

Salu2!

ok….thanks buddy, I'm going to put in order then the issue...I'll tell you how it turned out just to worry you and help me
regards

[jero30]

hello friend as promised is a debt…I have already been testing the memos thoroughly and I left them at 1958 mhz and I lowered latencies to 9-10-9-25 @ 1.6 volts and it works great,not a single problem....thanks for the info and the help.Regardshttp://foro.hardlimit.com/images/icons/icon7.gif