WPrime

[Raesan]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

AMD Phenom II X3 720 2.8GHz 20,069" / 627,428"

[Nemo]

Results of the laptop's performance. Intel i5 2430M 2.4 Ghz - 19,484 / 612,522 Best regards

[Bm4n]

Wow it gives double the performance compared to a Core 2 Duo, what machines these Sandy are and let's see how the Ivy ones go. Let's see if I can get wprime to run on OSX and I'll put the one from my MBA.

[Nemo]

I was the first surprised :fuckyea:, I suspect that part of the blame will be the HT and the Turbo.

Best regards

[wanautentico]

Wprime with a Phenom II X4 945 @ 3600 - 11.719 sec/376.027 sec

Not bad, right? for a micro that cost me around 100 € and on top of that with DDR2.

Greetings.

[Franziskaner]

well my old 9950 without oc 2.6 and with oc 2.9

[Twikzer]

Here is mine Twikzer- Intel i7 3770K (Ivy Bridge) 3,5 GHz oc 4,6 Ghz - 6.042 s./ 185.988 s.

[wanautentico]

I put the result with an FX 8350 in stock @ 4000 Mhz with turbo core @ 4200

Wanautentico - FX 8350 (Vishera) 4,0@4,1 Ghz (Turbo Core) - 8.796" / 273.001"

Not bad for not having OC, then they said that the FX were bad...

In reality if you use all the cores the turbo core is at 4100 Mhz, if you use 4 cores or less it is at 4200 Mhz.
Regards.

[wanautentico]

FX 8350 result at 4300 with Asrock's XBost activated

Wanautentico - FX 8350 (Vishera) 4.0@4.3 Ghz (XBoost) - 8,359 / 258.719"

For the price it has, this micro performs pretty well, right?
Best regards

[Fassou]

Here is a sample of the performance of a modest i5 4570 running Turbo.

Fassou - Intel Core i5 4570 (Haswell) 3.2@3.6 Ghz (Turbo) - 10,301" / 324,379"

Salu2!

[Bm4n]

@wanautentico:

FX 8350 result @ 4300 with Asrock XBost Activated

32M - 8,359 sec
1024M - 258,719 sec

Put the result in the standard format, like Fassou, to copy it into the list, and if you can edit instead of posting several results in a row

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[Fassou]

I have a question about the categories, and it is that there is one that you call "Dual core", but the only one that appears in it is Raesan with a Phenom II x3, which if I'm not mistaken has 3 cores :troll:

Regards!

[Bm4n]

@Fassou:

I have a question about the categories, and it is that there is one that you call "Dual core", but the only one that appears in it is Raesan with a Phenom II x3, which if I'm not mistaken has 3 cores :troll:

Regards!

So as not to make more divisions, just like the FX8 will go as 4 core….

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[Fassou]

@Bm4n:

For not making more divisions, just like the FX8 will go as 4 cores….

;D

[wanautentico]

@Bm4n:

Put the result in the standard format, like Fassou, to copy it into the list, and if you can edit instead of posting several results in a row

Sent from my iPad with Tapatalk HD

Sorry, I didn't realize.
It's already been edited, but I can't delete the first result without OC.
Regards!

[Twikzer]

Only 2 days have passed, but you have to add a section of 6 cores (i7-5820K and i7-5930K) and 8 (i7-5960X)

[Bm4n]

@Twikzer:

It's only been 2 days, but you have to add a section of 6 cores (i7-5820K and i7-5930K) and 8 (i7-5960X)

Well, you're taking your time to post any results with any of those micros

[Twikzer]

@Bm4n:

Well, you're taking your time to post any results with any of those micros

Siiisisi I'm impatient, but I'm missing the board that arrives this week, let's see if it arrives before 3Dmark releases an update and I get the achievement of unknown hardware, the processor and the ram are already in my possession.

Now that I think about it, it looks like I'll be the 1st in 2 categories LOL

[Twikzer]

I won't upload results, I'm very disappointed.. I get worse results than with the 3770k at 4.something, even overclocking the 5960x to 5.2.. in the first one it gives me 9.something seconds, and in the second one 109, but at 33%, so I guess it would take about 400 or so.

Anyway… my first extreme processor, and the last one.... I'll wait a month to see if they release a new driver, and if not, or it doesn't fix it, I'll sell it and continue with the 3770k.

i7-3770K at 4.something GHz, better results than an i7-5960X at 5.2 GHz

[wanautentico]

@Twikzer:

no subire resultados, estoy mu decepcionado.. consgo peores resultados que con el 3770k a 4,algo, incloousoceando el 5960x hasta 5,2.. en el primero me saca 9,algo segundos, y en el seguno 109, pero al 33%, asi que supongo que tardaria como 400 o por hay.

en fin… mi primer procesador extreme, y el ultimo.... me esperare 1 mes a ver si sacan nuevo driver, y si no, o no lo solucina, lo vendo y seguire con el 3770k.

i7-3770K a 4.algo GHz, mejores resultados que un i7-5960X a 5.2 GHz

No tiene lógica, algo fallará.
Instalaste todos los drivers de la placa base? Tiene la ultima bios?

Tiene que haber una explicación. El S.O. esta instalado desde cero?
Como anda de temperaturas?