New Computer

HectorRos

I still make a few settings according to the recommendations.

The team is basically for having fun hehe,

The processor, I think I have it clear, although it costs me a little more:

Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4Ghz Box Socket 1155 BX80623I72600K

I think it's a good CPU and from what I'm looking at I could overclock it quite a bit.

The card, Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 2GB GDDR5 + Dirt3 11188-05-20G Graphics Card This one has 2 GB GDDR5, isn't it better than a 1 GB one?

As for the motherboard, I've been looking at the PRO that they put in the configuration, but I've also looked at:

Asus P8P67-M B3 90-MIBDVA-G0EAY0DZ Motherboard

It's from the same range, the performance is similar from what I can see, and it's Micro-ATX, so it uses less space. What do you think about that? Is it much less performant?

As for cooling, since this is about OverClocking, Corsair Cooling Hydro Series H80 CWCH80 Liquid Cooling Would this liquid cooling be good? It's factory sealed, and whether you like it or not, it gives a little more confidence that a hose or something like that won't mess up.

Thanks to everyone for the help, comment on everything, especially about the motherboard.

Best regards!

DefSoul

I think it's good for overlock, it has a protection system in case you mess it up... or do they all have that?

ferelxyx

you can put this

i confused myself when putting the graphic, i wanted to put this - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 2GB GDDR5 + Dirt3 - which is 20 euros more

and i would put the ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 about 40 euros more, and if you can put instead of the WD primary a
OCZ Solid 3 SATA 3 2.5" SSD 120GB MAESTRO - which would be 100 euros more

regards

HectorRos

Same, but with a 2GB GDDR5 Raden HD and the cooling, wouldn't liquid be better?

I keep arguing with myself about the cooling...

Greetings!

Sylver

@HectorRos:

Same thing, but with a 2GB GDDR5 Raden HD and the cooling, wouldn't liquid be better?

I keep arguing with myself about the cooling...

Best regards!

The fact is that it doesn't necessarily have to be liquid, it's not a very hot micro either and air cooling is more than efficient today with a good heatsink like the Archon that ferelxyx proposes to you.

Regarding the graphics card, it has a pretty good heatsink and with the ATI driver you can control the fan speed, which normally comes with a default of 20% - 30% (depending on the model) because they don't need more.

Best regards

CNCBCN

@Sylver:

The fact is that it doesn't necessarily have to be liquid, it's not a very hot micro either and air cooling is more than efficient today with a good heatsink like the Archon that ferelxyx suggests.

Regarding the graphics card, it has a pretty good heatsink and with the ATI driver you can control the fan speed, which normally comes with a default speed of 20% - 30% (depending on the model) because it doesn't need more.

Regards

that's only true if we're short on cash :D:D:D an RL will always perform better than the best air cooler you can afford. No matter how many http://www.tienda-traxtore.com/tienda/index.php?page=pp_producto.php&md=0&ref=VEN679-2 you put in the tower :D:D:D:D

ferelxyx

@HectorRos:

Same thing, but with a 2GB GDDR5 Raden HD and the cooling, wouldn't liquid be better?

I keep arguing with myself about the cooling...

Regards!

yes, it's true I got confused when I put it I wanted to put this - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 2GB GDDR5 + Dirt3 - which is 20 euros more

already corrected

regards

HectorRos

Perfect, so Discos…

What do you think, to get the most out of that CPU and that Graphics, a OCZ Solid 3 SATA 3 2.5" SSD 120GB MAESTRO SLD3-25SAT3-120G Disco Duro SSD as primary, and for storage a Seagate Barrcuda of 2 TB.

I think with this I'm going to be pretty good, right?

Do you think I can overclock that CPU to 4.5 Ghz, with liquid cooling.

Regards!

CNCBCN

¿for what? ¿4.5? stable, for daily use I don't know on a PC for normal use 4.5 is a bit beastly, another thing is that you want to play stress tests to get a high score

HectorRos

No, for daily use, it's enough for me to work at 3.8 which is the turbo speed, it serves me, the thing is that I like simulation, like flight simulation for example, and many times it's several hours of intensive use.

Greetings.

Sylver

@CNCBCN:

that's only true if we're short of cash :D:D:D a RL will always perform better than the best air cooler you can afford. for many http://www.tienda-traxtore.com/tienda/index.php?page=pp_producto.php&md=0&ref=VEN679-2 that you put in the tower :D:D:D:D

Totally agree, that's exactly what I'm saying

CNCBCN

@HectorRos:

No, para el uso diario, con que me funcione a 3.8 que es la velocidad de turbo, me serve, el tema es que a mi me gusta la simulación, la de vuelo por ejemplo, y muchas veces son varias horas de uso intensivo.

Saludos.

en ese caso puedes optar por sistemas de aire o por RL ¿ que es mejor? depende de el presupuesto, pero desde mi punto de vista una RL es para darle mucha caña al PC, sino no merece la pena la inversión. pásate por la rama del super pi y compara tu mismo los OC con H2O y los OC con aire el tema de el ruido es tema aparte, pero puedes tener una RL insoportable y una por aire peor ( mas ruidosa )
P.D fríamente para lo que tu quieres el PC yo optaría por aire y la pasta que te ahorras en la RL la metes en componentes ( un RAID 0 con un par de SSD ) un SLI etc….

Nemo