GPS for the car

[Nemo]

I now use, for short trips, the GPS of the Galaxy S2. Which, as they say around here, with the big screen is very easy to use.

For longer trips I use a Garmin Nuvii from 2006 (I don't remember the exact model) with updated maps of Europe.
For a while I used a TomTom and the truth is that I didn't like at all the way of showing data or routes on the screen. With the Garmin everything is much clearer and at a quick glance you situate yourself on the route... of course when it decides to go crazy it goes crazy like any other son of a neighbor.

Best regards.

[Obione]

I don't complain about Tomtom, I've got used to using my old one which is better than my Garmin (slower, smaller screen) but it's true that the latter is somewhat simpler.

I've also ridden with a couple of colleagues who used smartphones and most of the time they worked very well, but others not so much... Which also doesn't mean that the navigator always works :ugly:

Anyway, more or less everything is said, now it's up to us to consult with the amohada. You'll let us know

[pestanin]

Companions, what I see is that between the 160€ that I thought I would spend, and the 300€, there is a number of them that are crazy. In fact, now seeing the coolest ones, the ones below that give me a lot of pity jajaja. For example, Garmin has like 12 models in that price range and I get the feeling that the qualitative leap is important. What I have clear is that for me the Nexus as a GPS is a hell so maybe I have to aim higher :frio:

Best regards.

[Obione]

My dad's cost 150 a while ago and mine 100 recently. The only thing I complain about with mine is that it's slow and a recalculation can make you miss a turn, apart from the fact that it takes a while to get the satellites at the beginning but both work well.

What do the expensive ones offer?

[XaviJS]

Is the Nexus S this?

Nexus S – Android Device Gallery

The specifications it comes with are good… it's strange that it makes such a fool of you. I have an XPERIA NEO that even has worse performance and my Google Navigator works like a charm.

I recommend that you clean up the phone by deleting all the applications you don't use to see if the performance improves.

Think about it, the money you're going to spend on a better GPS you could spend on a better smartphone, with which you would get better GPS, better performance, a better camera (probably), etc. Plus, you would have maps that are always updated for free courtesy of Google.

On the other hand, with a GPS you would have to pay for updates and even if you were outside of Europe it would serve you as a paperweight...

Best regards!

[pestanin]

My dad's cost 150 a while ago and mine 100 recently. The only thing I complain about with mine is that it's slow and a recalculation can make you miss a turn, besides it takes a while to get the satellites at first but both work well.

What do the expensive ones offer?

In general, the differences seem to be in screen sizes and resolutions. Some also have Bluetooth to connect via mobile and get weather data, roads, etc... The most expensive ones incorporate slots for cards or multitouch screens. Others have voice navigation and lane guidance. They start to incorporate all kinds of features that I imagine will never be used so there are prices and features for all tastes. Models from lowest to highest price…
.

The best part is that there are models within these that I'm seeing that incorporate lifetime map updates for free. I think something LIKE THIS would be more than enough for me.

XaviJS that's the model. It's luxurious but for what it is, making and receiving calls ;D. I'm very happy with it besides the fact that being the Google phone I get updates more "quickly" and running a "bare" Android it's much smoother than some more powerful ones. I have 28 apps on the phone so that wouldn't be the problem and it's freshly wiped and updated to ICS. Before I had a Galaxy S and the GPS never worked out completely although it's also true that I know people who use them as GPS and are so happy. It depends on so many things….

Best regards.

[Franziskaner]

hello everyone
man the difference between garmin and tomtom is …...
it is easier to pirate the garmin than the tomtom ( to introduce non-original road maps )
you have to pay for the maps with both garmin and tomtom and you will also have to pay for the radar updates, so what are the differences? none
with both I think you have a year to update maps and radars, after the year you have to pay
regards

[pestanin]

Well...

https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?pID=97146

Read where it says:

Avoid traffic jams

Thanks to the FREE lifetime traffic updates from 3D Traffic, our comprehensive traffic avoidance system, the nüvi 2595LMT can help you avoid delays. We check traffic conditions more than 2 billion times a month, so you can easily change your route, avoid traffic jams and arrive on time.
Enjoy FREE lifetime map updates

With FREE lifetime map updates, you'll always have the most up-to-date maps, POIs and navigation information at your fingertips. Map updates are available for download up to 4 times a year, with no subscription fees or upgrade and no end dates.

And as I said above, this happens with all Garmin models with LMT nomenclature. Free updates for life.

Best regards.

[Franziskaner]

man, it's not expensive "" Garmin GPS Nuvi 2595 LMT Europe 5-inch screen with Bluetooth - Gps - 010-01002-02 :: TPO Informática ;D

[pestanin]

I will tell you when I arrive

Goodbye.

[XaviJS]

I am doing my final project (I can't wait to finish it...) using the GPS on my XPERIA NEO.

It's about making a fleet control system for vehicles through which I track the phone's position with the GPS.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
The results have been good, the GPS it uses is as reliable as or more reliable than a dedicated GPS. What differs is that manufacturers can choose one GPS chip or another which can give better or worse results... But generally it should go better, since with the use of A-GPS (It first uses triangulation through telephone antennas to find a more or less certain position) then it finds the GPS signal sooner.

So, if you prefer a dedicated GPS go ahead, that's my humble opinion

[Bm4n]

If the truth is that normal GPS devices still take their time to start up, the mobile phone, as soon as it manages to triangulate, is already there, the story is in remote places where there is no coverage... there it takes longer and more than with a normal GPS :risitas:

[pestanin]

Sure sure. I'm talking about my experience which is tremendously bad. Without going any further (well almost went very far), yesterday I had to go to Calle Álcala from Pza Castilla and I put on Navigation well…, I arrived at the destination and had not yet connected :wall:. I imagine it depends on a lot of things but certainly for me it's going like ass.

Best regards.

[Nemo]

Well, a good way to connect quickly is to stay still :facepalm:. This way, triangulation is more effective.

Best regards

[Yorus]

I used to drive a lot for work (now I have other functions and don't) and I used this mobile with a separate GPS module via bluetooth:

and without any problems, only that the screen is… tiny.

Now I have the Galaxy Ace with integrated GPS and Sygic and it works perfectly, apart from the improvement in screen size and that it is easier to use in these cases as it is touch screen. And as Mystique says, I always carry it with me and so even in emergencies I have it at hand. That said, the charger for the car cigarette lighter is always nearby.

Still, I understand that you want something dedicated, current mobiles are small PCs with many possible combinations of configuration and software installed and you don't know where they can go wrong, while a dedicated GPS has a more closed environment and therefore fewer things that can influence its stability or functioning.

[XaviJS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

@Yorus:

Así y todo comprendo que quieras algo dedicado, los móviles actuales son pequeños PCs con muchísimas combinaciones posibles de configuración y software instalado y no sabes por donde te pueden salir, mientras que un GPS dedicado tiene un entorno mas cerrado y por lo tanto menos cosas que puedan influenciar en su estabilidad o funcionamiento.

Aquí te doy toda la razón, es verdad que hoy en día los Smartphones abarcan mucho terreno y ya se sabe que cuantas mas cosas se tiene, mas difícil es mantenerlas todas bajo control.

Saludos!

[pestanin]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Así y todo comprendo que quieras algo dedicado, los móviles actuales son pequeños PCs con muchísimas combinaciones posibles de configuración y software instalado y no sabes por donde te pueden salir, mientras que un GPS dedicado tiene un entorno mas cerrado y por lo tanto menos cosas que puedan influenciar en su estabilidad o funcionamiento.

Esa era la idea Yorus. Ante la dificultad de dar con el porqué de que el GPS en el Nexus vaya tan regulero, quería darle una oportunidad a un específico para coche.

Un saludo.

[Franziskaner]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

digo yo que lo que mas influirá es que el GPS tira de satélites ( yo uso un Garmin para la montaña y creo que pilla de 6 a 8 para marcarte la posición ) y un móvil te hará la triangulacion a golpe de antena o repetidor y en ciertas zonas ….... brillan por su ausencia
saludos

[XaviJS]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

@Franziskaner:

digo yo que lo que mas influirá es que el GPS tira de satélites ( yo uso un Garmin para la montaña y creo que pilla de 6 a 8 para marcarte la posición ) y un móvil te hará la triangulacion a golpe de antena o repetidor y en ciertas zonas ….... brillan por su ausencia
saludos

La gracia esta en que los móviles traen sensor GPS! Con lo que usan exactamente lo mismo que los GPS integrados: los satélites GPS.

Lo que comentas de las antenas es una ventaja, a diferencia de los GPS dedicados (la mayoría), no disponen de conexión a internet mediante GSM (telefonía móvil) cuya principal ventaja es que tiene mas cobertura en sitios mas cerrados (siempre y cuando haya antenas cerca). La desventaja principal y clarísima es que tiene un error mucho mas grande y mas variable.

El funcionamiento es simple. Si hay suficientes satélites como para dar una posición fiable mediante GPS (mínimo 3 satélites creo), se usará la señal del GPS. Y si no hay señal GPS se usará GSM.

Saludos!

[Franziskaner]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

crees bien XaviJS el mínimo son tres antenas , mas que nada por que sino no puedes hacer una"triangulacion" que como todos sabemos tiene tres vértices ;D
solo me planteo una duda : un GPS dedicado te marca la altura a la que esta tirando de satelites ¿el movil que hace? por que no creo que pueda calcular la altura tirando de repetidores .
saludos