Test of the Real Nvidia Gtx Titan, single-sli-tri Sli, 4 WAY SLI
-
I won't have the Titan until next week :wall:
While I wait, see if you can resolve some doubts for me:
- Drivers, beta or WHQL?
- For overclocking, I see that EVGA Precision is used, I was used to MSI Afterburner, is it for some reason?
- The monitor's overdrive, the function to give more than 60Hz, has anyone tried it?
- As for overclocking, from what I read, it's best to leave the fan on auto, and link Power and Temperature to the top, without needing to touch the voltage, right? Also, I come from some GTX 580s, they didn't have Boost, so I'm not very clear if I need to touch the offset or if it's not necessary to touch it and just raising the base speed is enough.
Thanks in advance.
P.D. What a wild score, and what a pleasure it is to see it there, I remember when I put a score among the top ten years ago the joy it gave me....
-
Bueno…ya es oficial:
http://www.3dmark.com/hall-of-fame/3dmark-11-top-extreme-preset/
Después del intocable Kingpin,voy yo..
Lo he tenido que hacer por huevos con el 2011..no me gusta nada esta plataforma,tiene menos rendimiento que el ivy,y además,el micro ya no es capaz de subir de 5,0GHZ..pero los 12 hilos hacen mucho en las pruebas de física y no me ha quedado mas remedio que utilizarla.
Por supuesto las gráficas están de stock,por aire y sin utilizar voltaje..para qué? si no sirve de momento..
Espero que os guste..;)
Un saludo.
Enhorabuena ;D
-
Until next week I won't have the Titan :wall:
While I wait, see if you can solve my doubts:
- Drivers, the beta or the WHQL?
- For overclocking, I see that EVGA Precision is used, I was used to MSI Afterburner, is it for some reason?
- The monitor's overdrive, the function to give more than 60Hz, has anyone tried it?
- Regarding overclocking, from what I read, it's advisable to leave the fan in auto, and increase Power and Temperature to the top, without needing to touch the voltage, right? Besides, I come from some GTX 580s, they didn't have Boost, so I'm not very clear if you have to touch the offset or if it's not necessary to touch it and just increasing the base speed is enough.
Thanks in advance.
P.D. What a wild score, and what a pleasure it is to see it there, I remember when years ago I put a score among the top ten the joy it made me …....
Hello Pepillo.
Basically they are the same. The beta have some improvements in games like Sniper Elite. I advise you the beta, they are stable and don't give problems. Although there isn't any specific improvement for TITAN.
To do strong OCs with a lot of energy consumption, that is, to benchmark, it's better in auto. To play with OC 24/7 it's better to make a profile.La The graphics card is not hot at all, the thing is that silence is prioritized over temperature, the only thing you have to do is a slightly more aggressive profile so that for example, it doesn't exceed 70º.
You can continue doing OC with the MSI, the last beta 3.0.6 I think, is different, and you will never see reflected what you have put in the OC. That's because of the boost.Es That is, if you increase +150MHZ, it won't add the stock speed of the graphics card to those +150MHZ as in the GTX 580. Instead, it will be variable, always less, depending on how good your chip is and the boost it carries. There are several... the good ones come with 1006MHZ stock with Boost.. others, the few, 996MHZ.. and the smalas, I have one, 980MHZ..
Regarding the monitor's OC I haven't tried it.. mine is a 30" DELL and that one, doesn't swallow anything.. besides that it's very expensive to mess around with stories, and as long as it always stays, that is, ALWAYS, at 60 fps I have enough.
A balance and thanks.La truth is that I have been always in the HOF for several years, I even got to be the first... but one always entertains himself and it's worth something with the partners.. little, because I'm not even a overclocker.. but they respect you, they know you and they already talk to you about your.. hehe
-
Tremendous envy, but nothing healthy. Of the bad, bad ;DCongratulations
-
Thanks for the info. I still don't understand this:
You can still do OC with the MSI, the latest beta 3.0.6 I think, it's different, and you'll never see reflected what you've put into the OC. That's because of the boost.Es, that is, if you go up +150MHZ, the stock speed of the card won't add up to those +150MHZ like in the GTX 580. Instead, it will be variable, always less, depending on how good your chip is and the boost it has. There are several... the good ones come with 1006MHZ stock with Boost... others, the few, 996MHZ... and the smalas, I have one, 980MHZ...
Where do you put those extra 150, for example? In the offset? Or is that the difference between the normal and the boost and you shouldn't touch it? I'm really green on this, although I suppose when it arrives it won't be as difficult as it seems to me now.
Regards
-
Congratulations Elp3,…congratulations
regards
-
Thanks for the info. I still don't understand this:
Where do those extra 150 go, for example? Do you put them in the offset? Or is that the difference between the normal and the boost and you shouldn't touch it? I'm really green on this, although I suppose when it arrives it won't be as difficult as it seems to me now.
Regards
Yes, where you should raise the core is called GPU clock offset, the memory I think is called Mem clock offset, I don't think it's complicated because in the end it seems that the card does what it wants, that is, if you put +100 the same thing doesn't apply to you, that's why if you monitor the GPU clock you can see how much it's actually putting in. That's how you calculate how much you should put in the GPU clock offset.
In this screenshot from ELP3 you can see that it's monitoring the frequencies, two are seen at the same frequency and the others at less, it will influence a little how good the card turns out to be.
Regards
-
congratulations Elp3
-
Nvidia says that with Tomb raider, their GPUs perform worse than AMD because the game code arrived too late... Surely with future drivers, the performance will be much better;Congratulations Elpe, you are in second place in 3DMARK, total orgasm??jejeje
By the way, I saw that you have 4 Titan??? My God, your wife lets you... I can see it coming jejeje.
Best regards.
-
Nvidia says that with Tomb raider, their Gpu's performance is worse than AMD's because the game's code arrived too late….Surely with future drivers, the performance will be much better;
Congratulations Elpe, you're in second place in 3DMARK, total orgasm??jejeje
By the way, I saw that you have 4 Titan???My God, your wife lets you…I can see it coming jejejej.
Best regards.
That's exactly what I was referring to. That and the fact that with all the fuss, a previous build of the game worked better than the final one, which has flaws (maybe because the new technology wasn't implemented in the final version, or maybe not ¬¬).
And yes, second without doing the KingPin's tricks, I'm sorry but with free graphics and with LN2 and all the technical material and advisors in the world, custom mods for the graphics, etc, I'm sorry but in reality they are not competing fairly for a result.
Anyone can beat records like that. But well, some are pulling the wool over others' eyes and others are taking the credit.
-
ELP3 congratulations on the results.
There is no solution for the ropes in crysis 3 until they patch it. I have tried about 300 mods and there is no way without having the SDK or the sources. Only they can fix it.
Another bug to add in Tomb Raider, whether you have amd or nvidia, the post-processing effects are only visible if you play in windowed mode. I'm talking about the glows on lights and campfires, water splashes or blood on the screen, camera dirt...
Full Graphics only in windowed mode! :: Tomb Raider General Discussions
Crystal Dynamic is looking into it.
-
You already announced it but it's now official. Congratulations ELP3!
-
Elp3, you have to change the title, hehe, you have to put "and quad-li", haha.
Congratulations, it's a second place that smells of Gold, since it's clear that the thing about kingpin is "something else".
I was waiting to see if I could get Tomb Raider somehow for steam, but I see that in the end I'm going to have to buy it just to see that "dishy hair"!!, haha
Best regards,
By the way I've flashed one following xtremsystems with powerlimit to 120 and fans at 100, I have to test it more, but for now it's not that it boosts the graphics more, but yesterday the "bad" one that goes up less was doing the same score as the "good" one without flashing in unigine-hwbot, I know it's a synthetic test, but there I leave that….. I'll keep doing more tests to see how it goes.
-
Let no one take offense at what I am about to say!! Especially ELP3, but… what's the point of being on the list of the "best" when all ELP3 has done is "crash" the hardware. For example, I see what Kingpin has done as more meritorious if it's true that he hard modded it, with modified drivers, LN2, etc., and you keep criticizing him as if what he has done is wrong.
The fun of benchmarking (it used to be like this) was modifying software and hardware to achieve scores that normal people couldn't achieve. I remember the Pentium era when with a pencil, you would modify the board to get that extra voltage to increase frequencies...
I'm not saying all this to stir up trouble or anything, but sometimes I think that essence of the overclocker-bencher has been lost, since now there are many shortcuts to achieve high OCs, and you don't tinker as much with how to modify a hard, even knowing that you will probably fry it.
By the way, I'm so envious of you ELP3! You could already have given me one! I'll probably get either an ASUS or a Gigabite next week, and I'll have to save some time to get another one for SLI...
-
Let no one be offended by what I am going to say!! Especially ELP3, but… what's the point of being on the list of the "best" when all ELP3 has done is "overclock" the hardware. For example, I see what Kingpin has done as more meritorious if it's as you say, that he hardmodded it, with modified drivers, LN2, etc., and you keep criticizing him as if what he has done is wrong.
The fun of benchmarking (it used to be like that) was modifying software and hardware to achieve scores that normal people couldn't achieve. I remember the Pentium era when with a pencil, you would modify the board to get that extra voltage to increase frequencies...
I'm not saying all this to stir up trouble or anything, but sometimes I think that essence of overclocker-bencher has been lost, since now there are many shortcuts to achieve high OCs, and you don't tinker as much with how to modify a hard, even knowing that you're probably going to fry it.
By the way, I'm so envious of you ELP3! You could just give me one! I'll probably get an ASUS or a Gigabyte next week, and I'll have to save some time to get another one for SLI...
Well, as a synthetic benchmarker, hehe, I can tell you that, I suppose like Elp3, you're tweaking and tweaking things until you get the drivers that work best with that card, that the parameters are correct, that the extra fans cool where they need to, that the CPU and RAM are balanced, etc, etc, etc, and then some nitrogen guy comes along and puts the micro or the card or both, as is the case, with nitrogen and bam!! world record!!, hehe, it's a bit of a hump, I benchmark almost every day and I stay at more or less mediocre scores since there comes a point where you can't advance because what's above you is already nitrogen, so the comparison is a bit unbalanced and unfair, as I say I understand that Elp3 has adjusted it as much as possible so that everything runs as smoothly as possible and there it is, not just overclocking and that's it….. not to mention, in 3dmark11 with a 670 (When I had them) I ended up in second place, very close to first, I know that now if I got one I would be first, but in that ranking precisely there is no one with nitrogen, as soon as someone with nitrogen shows up with a 670, water and air are over, hehe, that's why I don't feel like getting a 670 to benchmark, so I see Elp3's achievement as a big deal!!
Regards!!
-
But the fact that you use LN2 is already a merit, because here in my city, you have to have a license and attend classes just to be able to use it and get it. Then (I assume because I have never done OC with LN2) you have to set up a container that refrigerates the plate/processor, and well, the OC will work the same as one that uses water or air, it is a matter of playing around until you get the maximum potential of the processor without having the temperature limit.
I don't know, I don't want to take away the merit from ELP3's score, but rather defend a bit what kingpin has achieved. It's annoying that he has a higher score for using LN2, so fight to get that position using the same thing!
-
Let's see.. I think many don't know who Kingpin or Shamino or a long etc... and who the rest of us are. Kingpin is a professional overclocker, highly reputed and in this case works for EVGA. He earns a lot of money with it, and obviously has knowledge and innate talent as well as the means. I, on the other hand, am a home user with very good equipment, who tries to get the most out of it within reasonable parameters and with the means I have available. Kingpin, for example, for that test, may have had at his disposal like 30 or 40 processors chosen and he selected the best of those. EVGA has put just as many boards with specific parameters and protection measures nullified and on top of that an arsenal of TITANs with selected chips and he has again chosen the ones that gave him the best results. To this we must add that as he doesn't pay anything, he does the volt-mods for free because they don't have to worry if they break, not like me, which has cost me 1000€ each graphic and I have to pamper it.. and if we also consider that even the OC program, the EVGA precison, has been modified for the occasion and tons of LN2, which as is well known, almost everyone has at home.. then I think everything is said. Each one has their merit, he is paid to do what he has done. That is to beat all existing records, with his good doing and with unlimited means... And I, with stratospheric hardware, but after all, for personal use, I can get in there, with everything in stock dissipation, without voltages and tuning as much as possible, but always with margin so that all the components that are in their original state remain perfect after the bench, because they are mine and I want to keep them to play which is basically what I want the team for. Having said that, thank you all.. and yes, it is very possible that anyone with a team of my characteristics and a minimum of knowledge, would also be in that ranking. Regards. -
But the fact that you're using LN2 is already a merit, because here in my city, you have to have a license and attend classes just to be able to use it and get it. Then (I assume because I've never done OC with LN2) you have to set up a container that cools the plate/processor, and well, the OC will work the same as one that uses water or air, it's about playing around until you get the maximum potential of the processor without having the temperature limit.
I don't know, I don't want to take away the merit from ELP3's score, but rather defend a bit what kingpin has achieved. It's annoying that he has a higher score for using LN2, so fight to get that position using the same thing!
It's clear that kimgpin or Shamino are where they are for a reason, for a company to allow you to do that is because they have stood out with it in every way, people who don't know don't support them a multinational.
But this is like everything, even motorcycle racing, only the official drivers of the most powerful teams aspire to win, the others have to fight every race to get a podium since their material is inferior, the money that the team or sponsor has influences a lot, it's similar here.
I don't criticize kingpin, I think that if EVGA supports him it's because he understands a lot, but doing it with your hardware without support and also not wanting to break anything, because it's very expensive, also has merit, it's not just about plugging in and being done.
regards
-
Of course, my intention was not to take away from the ELP3 score (after all, I have not seen the work behind that score either), but to defend a bit the position of kingpin, which some of you have jumped to as if I had cheated.
It is clear that if you do not have a resource source behind (sponsors), it is difficult to get extreme scores, but this is like with online games (LoL, Starcraft, etc.) where sponsors pay worker salaries to players, so they spend the day playing, or Intel-AMD-Nvidia, to improve their R&D in their products.
In summary, do not get angry or take it badly, I just wanted to be a bit sincere and criticize a little, hehe.
-
No se, no quiero quitar merito a la puntuación de ELP3, sino defender un poco lo que kingpin ha conseguido.
Son puntos de vista obviamente, yo creo que nadie critica, solo se comenta que el escalon de "recursos" es muy grande y meritorio, lo de kingpin tambien es meritorio, pero no es lo mismo, es como si Elp3 se compra una moto y se pone a correr en circuito con los profesionales y queda segundo, pues es meritorio, obviamente el mejor es el que gana, por que sabe correr y tiene la mejor moto
@Lugal:Que jode que tenga mas puntuación por usar LN2, entonces lucha por conseguir ese puesto usando lo mismo!
Yo actualmente estoy 6º a nivel mundial de 17250 registrados en no profesional(Entusiasta) en hwbot, no puedes usar nitrogeno ni sistemas de enfriamiento externos mas que el agua y aire. No puedo ni quiero meterme en esa liga que ya es para gente que sabe, no me "jode", solo que cuando en una grafica consigo 20 puntos y miro para arriba y veo l2n pues no veo justo que yo compita con ellos, por que no tengo ninguna posibilidad, pero bueno esto es otra pelicula, jejeje
En resumen, no os enfadéis ni os lo toméis mal, solo quería ser un poco sincero y criticar un poquito, jeje.
No creo que nadie se enfade por una opinion hecha desde el respeto, pero dime, cuanto te ha pagado kingpin para que lo defiendas aqui??, dime, dime, cuanto?, ;D
Una abrazo!!!
