Test of the Real Nvidia Gtx Titan, single-sli-tri Sli, 4 WAY SLI
-
In my opinion, the Ultra only has a place if you go over 300W. The weak point of the Titans has become more than clear, releasing an Ultra is only possible if they put two 8-pin connectors to exceed 300W, otherwise the normal Titan would "polish" it with overclocking.
Regards
-
In my opinion, the Ultra only has a place if they go over 300W. The weak point of the Titans has become more than clear, releasing an Ultra is only possible if they put two 8-pin connectors to exceed 300W, otherwise the normal Titan would "polish" it with overclocking.
Regards
For me the most attractive if the rumors that the Titan LE was a 780 and cost between $500 and $600 were true, that one would have the best performance/price ratio.
But that TDP they put on the Titan seems low to me and the LE's even more, if they released an Ultra it would be rare to have less than 250W, but 206W for the Titan seems like little to me.
Regards
-
Hello:
Here, the details of the future Titan and 700 series ….........
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN LE is GTX 780, GeForce 700 Series Detailed | VideoCardz.com
Best regards.
-
Hello:
Here, the details of the future Titan and 700 series ….........
Best regards.
-
Teeth, I've sent you a private message, let me know how this latest one is going.
As for the new series, I don't think there will be an Ultra version, but I do think there will be a dual one that they might call Ultra, but I predict they will keep the 790GTX. Maybe the dual one could be based on chips directly derived from Titan like the 780GTX, and they would be in between the 780 and the 770 and be chips with a new redesign although, again, derived from the Titans, and I think they won't release anything until August-September. Personally, I would be very surprised if this year and up to maxwell they release a Mono-GPU more powerful than Titan, I think it's unthinkable, whatever the pages say, which are increasingly sensationalist in my way of understanding, and when Maxwell comes, we'll see its real difference with Titan, which may not be so great despite the change in size, as lately Nvidia has been looking very much at consumption -
Review SLI titan SC:
EVGA GeForce GTX TITAN 6GB SuperClocked Video Cards in SLI :: TweakTown
-
I don't know if you have tried the Beta drivers, but for me at least the change is brutal. At stock voltage, they already exceed 1200Mhz with ease. Also, I don't know why it applies 1,20V to one and 1,18V to the other when both are at stock voltage. But anyway, with different voltage from each other, the 2 are currently at 1215Mhz stable. If Nvidia hits another driver home run and continues to increase its efficiency in these cards, their performance will certainly be beastly.
The first card:
The second card
The computer is freshly formatted, meaning the drivers are completely clean, but I can't explain why it puts different voltage on one and the other when they are both the same ASIC (well, they differ by 0.3%, so I doubt this will be noticeable). I think this suggests that the ASIC is not as important as people are saying. I think the voltage difference is perhaps because the drivers are not yet fully polished, at least for Multi-GPU configurations, and I think both will go with 1,18V. Anyway, I will try to measure it to see if they are at 1,18V or 1,20V or if they really have a different voltage applied to each.
-
Reading, I saw a program that removes temperature protection and allows the graph to go up a lot, but of course I see that it is very, very dangerous. It is called Nvidia PowerMizer Manager. For people with LN2 or powerful RLs, perhaps it could be tried, but I see it as excessively aggressive:
nVidiaPowerMizerManager_v1.01.exe — RGhost — file sharing
-
In the end, the Titans are yielding to OC, it's just that these cards should never come capped, many people who buy a Titan want to be able to OC them well, they should have to provide facilities for it just like the extreme CPUs.
regards
-
Have you noticed any improvement in performance other than the OC improvement? -
Lugal, what exactly do you mean when you say performance? More score at the same speed?
-
Yes, more FPS or improvement in the bench scores.
-
I don't know if you've tried the Beta drivers, but at least for me the change is brutal. At stock voltage, they already exceed 1200Mhz with ease. Also, I don't know why it applies 1.20V to one and 1.18V to the other when both are at stock voltage. But anyway, with different voltage from each other, the two are currently stable at 1215Mhz. If Nvidia hits another driver home run and continues to increase its efficiency in these cards, their performance will certainly be beastly.
! The first card:
!
! The second card
!The computer is freshly formatted, meaning the drivers are completely clean, but I can't explain why it puts different voltage in one and the other when they are both the same ASIC (well, they differ by 0.3%, so I doubt it will be noticeable). I think this suggests that the ASIC is not as important as people are saying. I think the voltage difference is perhaps because the drivers are not fully polished yet, at least for Multi-GPU configurations, and I think both will go to 1.18V. Anyway, I will try to measure it to see if they are at 1.18V or 1.20V or if each one actually has a different voltage applied.
Well, I just tried them after reading you. And yes, they allow more OC, my Gigabytes are now at 1228, the SC is at 1254... :ugly: If they keep going like this, we'll put them at 1300.................... xD.
Although I always go with the Vcore fixed at 1.21. Certainly, I expect them to stretch much more with drivers, if not in OC, the ones we are using are already very good, in performance they still have a lot to stretch...
Regards...
Yes, more FPS or improvement in the score in the benches.
In performance they have also given a boost, not a huge one, but I'm replaying Metro 2033 now, with everything maxed out without AA and DOF activated. And I was between 55 / 60 fps. Now I move about 5 fps more above. Sometimes more, sometimes less...
The images are resized to 50%, and converted to jpg, as the AB captures them in bmp, they weigh about 40 Mb... :ugly:
Regards...
-
Duplicated….
-
Trplicado….......xD.
The forum was a bit "worky" last night, sorry.
Salu2...
-
Jotole already released the enter button
Another page with a lot of information about Titan, there's even a table about ASICS and booting:
[User-Review] GTX Titan - OC, Tests, Benches, Verbrauch, Bios, Boost, Wakü Umbau - User Review
Jotole take a look here, you might be interested:
http://kingpincooling.com/forum/showthread.php?p=25162#post25162
-
Jotole lets go of the enter button
Another page with a lot of information about Titan, there's even a table about ASICS and booting:
[User-Review] GTX Titan - OC, Tests, Benches, Verbrauch, Bios, Boost, Wakü Umbau - User Review
Jotole take a look here, you might be interested:
Very interesting reading majo, I wish more reputable sites would do a review like that user's..
About the Mod, and soldering the Epower…..............:ugly: I also find it very interesting, I had seen some vol mod to a titan before....But I don't see myself doing it :ugly::ugly::ugly:
Just seeing them go over 1200, I'm satisfied..... xD. That user Xtreme Addict, comments on the hwbot forum, that he has put it at 1600 with 1,52 voltage........!!
That of putting them at 1750 Mhz, for those who are given them, I would burn them for sure............ :troll:
Thanks for the links…..... ;).
Best regards...
P.D. How much will a "monster" like this consume with an Epower?, about 500W??
-
Nvidia GTX Titan - modified VBIOS for more control and better overclocking
Nvidia GTX Titan - modified VBIOS for more control and better overclocking
If anyone wants them, send me a PM and I'll send them to you
-
Very interesting comparison of GTX 680 - GTX 690 - HD 7970 - HD 7990 - Titan - Titan SLI in 3840x2160 resolution.
Frame Rating: High End GPUs Benchmarked at 4K Resolutions | PC Perspective
-
Very interesting comparison of GTX 680 - GTX 690 - HD 7970 - HD 7990 - Titan - Titan SLI in 3840x2160 resolution.
Frame Rating: High End GPUs Benchmarked at 4K Resolutions | PC Perspective
Thanks for the link Patagonico, soon it will be more viable to get screens of that type and it's good to know what we are facing with those 4K resolutions, for now a surround of that not even look at it….......:ugly:
Salu2...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Registrarse Conectarse