Gtx 670 3 Way sli comparison
-
This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:
Buenas,
Tenía ganas de pasar unas pruebas con mi equipo y compartirlas con tod@s. He utilizado 3 monitores de 24" a resoluciones de 5760-1080 y 1980-1920 con el procesador a 5 GH y un overclok sobre las gráficas de 100hz a la gpu, 300 mhz las memorias.
He utilizado los drivers beta 322.00 sobre windows 8, menos el metro y el f1 que lo e corrido con W7.
Equipo de pruebas:Intel I7 3820 5GHZ
Memorias 2400 cl11
Raid 0 ocz vertex 4
Gráficas gtx 670 3 sli
Fuente enermax evo 1500w
benq 2420t *3Juegos y benchmark utlizados:
3DMark 11 v1.05
Unigine heaven 4.0
Unigine Valley 1.0
Alan Wake
Crysis 3
Hitman absolution
Max Payne 3
Redident Evil 6
Tomb Raider3DMark 11 v1.05 configuración gráfica xtreme:
!
Unigine Heaven 4.0
!
Unigine Valley 1.0
!
Alan Wake configuración gráfica 1920-1080:
!
configuración gráfica 5760-1080:
!
Crysis 3 configuración gráfica 1920-1080:
!
configuración gráfica 5760-1080:!
Hitman Absolution configuración gráfica 1920-1080:
!
configuración gráfica 5760-1080:
!
Max Payne 3 configuración gráfica 5760-1080:
!
configuración gráfica 1920-1080:
!
Resident Evil 6 Benchmark demo:
Tomb Raider configuración gráfica 5760-1080:
!
configuración gráfica 1920-1080:
!
Aquí tenéis los resultados de los juegos y algunos benchmark.
Un saludo.
-
Excellent Curro Ruruloko…!!!
Great performance comparison in Surround....!! It's clear that this type of multi-monitor configuration sucks up a lot....
Although that trio of 670s defends itself more than enough............... ;).
A hug...!!
-
Excellent Curro Ruruloko…!!!
Great performance comparison in Surround....!! It's clear that this type of multimonitor configurations suck really well....
Although that trio of 670s defends itself more than enough............... ;).
A hug...!!
Hello, thanks for your understanding.
That's right, a job I had this weekend that you won't see XD. I wanted to share this experience with surround and share it with everyone, since not everyone could afford a couple of Titans to handle surround.
The 3 sli perform very well, but at those resolutions, a few more gigabytes of vram would be very useful, like the Titans XD. In the end, I'll have to get a few......
For now, I'll wait to see what the new gtx 700s come out and see if I'm interested in changing them....
A hug, buddy.
-
Very good comparison to those resolutions, the thing about Max Payne 3 seems strange to me with so little difference with such a different resolution, the only explanation I see is that the CPU caps the fps at 1080p with a triSLI, at a higher resolution it's easy for the three cards to work more happily or with more load and that's why in the end it's almost the same.
That engine that Rockstar uses tends to be quite demanding of the CPU or rather that it doesn't take advantage of the CPUs as it should, that's why it seems easy to me that the limit is marked by the CPU, it's like GTA IV that if better use of the CPU is achieved the game runs more stable.
But the work of showing us how these cards go with these resolutions is appreciated.
Best regards.
-
Very good comparison to those resolutions, the thing about Max Payne 3 seems strange to me with so little difference with such a different resolution, the only explanation I see is that the CPU caps the fps at 1080p with a triSLI, at a higher resolution it's easy for the three cards to work more happily or with more load and that's why in the end it's almost the same.
That engine that Rockstar uses tends to be quite demanding of the CPU or rather it doesn't use the CPUs as it should, that's why it seems easy to me that the limit is marked by the CPU, it's like GTA IV that if you get better use of the CPU the game runs more stable.
But the work of showing us how those cards go with those resolutions is appreciated.
Best regards.
Many thanks fjavi. About max payne 3, it could be that I did the benchmarks on different screens and resolutions, but it doesn't have to, rather it makes sense with the CPU load.
I had GTA IV prepared to do the result but I didn't do it for the same reason, it's a game that squeezes the CPU and with the 3820 you wouldn't get benefits from the 3 sli. If I had my old 3930k maybe I would have passed it…..
Let's see if I move to the Titan club and expose more results
Best regards fellow.
-
Thanks for the job Ruruloko, very good review and very good performance :D.
Regards.
-
Good afternoon, thanks for your understanding.
Yes, a job I had this weekend that you can't see XD. I wanted to upload this experience with surround and share it with everyone, since not everyone could afford a pair of Titans to handle surround.
3 sli perform very well, but at those resolutions it would be very good to have a few gigabytes of vram more, like the Titans XD in the end I will have to get a few......
For now I will wait to see what the new gtx 700s come out and see if I'm interested in changing them....
A hug, buddy.
I know the work these reviews have, although it doesn't seem like anything is being done, you end up as tired as the pc guys.......xD.
I have one in the works with the resolution I handle now, let's see if I feel "inspired" one day and do it......
I think you're wrong about the Vram, friend Ruru, let me explain.
To handle more vram and be able to put filters you need more power too. I had this resolution until recently, first it was with a 580 sli, then a 4 way, I changed to a 3 way of 670 and I tried, (just like you
) a 4 way of 670. In all of them I was short of vram for 5760 x 1080p. With the 580 I had to disable Aero, so as not to run out of vram in some titles. But I played without filters. And that was with 1.5GbWhen you apply filters, which is the only thing that demands more vram in that surround, you are making the cards work more and that's when you run out of power to move the 3 monitors, with filters applied.
For example now with the Titans, I have plenty of vram, but my resolution is a barbarity, I move almost everything above 80 fps, without filters. The moment I apply filters, the performance drops about 20 fps, and I run out of power again before I run out of vram.....................
I don't know if I've explained myself.................:ugly:
I plan to explain all that with images when I create the thread of 7680 x 1440p, but for now I'm enjoying it like a little kid... ;).
A hug..........!!
-
Many thanks fjavi. Regarding max payne 3, it could be that I did the benchmarks on different screens and resolutions, but it also doesn't have to be, it rather makes sense to the cpu load.
I had GTA IV prepared to do the result but I didn't do it for the same reason, it's a game that squeezes the cpu and with the 3820 you wouldn't get benefits from the 3 sli. If I had my old 3930k maybe I would have passed it…..
Let's see if I move to the Titan club and expose more results
Best regards, compañero.
It's just that the engine of GTA and Max Payne is a bit strange, the last one only lets you increase options if it detects vram to spare, but possibly the 1080p is no longer for a triSLI of 670, it's already a configuration for 1440p or 1600p as a minimum, that's why when you lower the resolution, the CPU may not be able to give many more frames.
Then between 3820 and 3930K I see little difference, the only difference would be that the K has more multiplier and should be able to go up something more, although possibly in games like Crysis 3 the cores would be noticed.
Anyway, the tests of GTA IV or the episodes are not useful for comparison because the SLI don't work well and it's a test just to see if you can play moderately, it's not realistic, although the one of the bikers is a mission of the game, besides with quite a lot of action, but the others must be from the multiplayer or maybe taking it freely with the helicopter, the ideal is always a gameplay.
regards
-
Hello!!!
Very good review!!!! Although in the end you have not told me anything!!!!
The data is very useful for me to see where things are at…
-
Gracias por el curro Ruruloko, muy buena review y muy buen rendimiento :D.
Saludos.
Gracias txemote, un placer poder enseñaros el rendimiento de las 670.
Un saludo.
@Jotole:Sé el curro que tienen estas review´s, aunque no parezca que se hace nada, terminas hasta los mismos de pc…....xD.
Tengo una en el tintero con la resolución que manejo ahora, a ver si me siento "inspirado", un día y la hago......
Creo que con la Vram te equivocas amigo Ruru, me explico.
Para manejar mas vram y poder meter filtros necesitas mas potencia tambien. Yo he tenido esta resolución hasta hace poco, primero fué con un Sli de 580, después un 4 way, cambié a un 3 way de 670 y probé, ( al igual que tú
) un 4 way de 670. En todas ellas iba corto de vram para 5760 x 1080p. Con las 580 tenía que desactivar el Aero, para no quedarme sin vram en algunos titulos. Pero tiraba sin filtros. y eso era con 1,5GbAl aplicar filtros, que es lo único que demanda mas vram en ese surround, estás haciendo que las tarjetas trabajen más y es entonces cuando te quedas sin potencia para mover los 3 monitores, con los filtros aplicados.
Por ejemplo ahora con las titanes, tengo vram de sobra, pero mi resolución es una barbaridad, muevo casi todo por encima de 80 fps, sin filtros. En el momento que aplico filtros, cae el rendimiento unos 20 fps, y vuelvo a quedarme sin potencia antes que sin vram.....................
No sé si me he explicado.................:ugly:
Tengo pensado explicar todo eso con imagenes cuando cree el hilo de 7680 x 1440p, pero por ahora estoy disfrutando como un niño chico... ;).
Un Abrazo..........!!
Así es e terminado de pc harto este fin de…. pero se agradece vuestras opiniones.
Te has explicado perfectamente, y que te voy a decir yo si ya has pasado por 3 generaciones en surround y multi gpu XD.
Es cierto que sin meter filtros a estas resoluciones casi que te comes los 2 gigas de vram, y si encima le metes filtros cae por todo rendimiento y ram........ como bien dices. Si no pasa nada para el mes que viene me quiero hacer de un sli de titanes y hacer la comparativa a los mismos detalles y resoluciones.Un abrazo Jotole.
Es que ese motor de los GTA y Max Payne es un poco raro,el ultimo solo te deja subir opciones si detecta vram de sobra, pero posiblemente ya los 1080p no sean para un triSLI de 670, ya es una configuración para 1440p o 1600p como minimo, por eso al bajar resolución quizá el CPU no pueda dar muchos mas Frames.
Luego entre 3820 y 3930K veo poca diferencia la única diferencia seria que el K tiene mas multiplicador y se debería poder subir algo mas, aunque posiblemente en juegos como Crysis 3 si se noten los nucleos.
De todas formas los test de GTA IV o los episodios no sirven para comparar por que los SLI no trabajan bien y es un test solo para ver si se podrá jugar medianamente, no es realista, aunque el de los moteros si es una misión del juego, además con bastante acción, pero los otros deben ser del multijugador o quizá tomando por libre con el helicóptero, lo ideal siempre es un gameplay.
saludos
Es cierto que el max payne 3 no te deja poner todos los filtro que te de la gana, se limita a los gigas de vram que tengas…..
Intentare hacerla de nuevo en diferentes pantallas haber si cambia algo. Voy a hacer una comparativa del GTA IV, ya por saber el framerate que puedo alcanzar XD.Un saludo.
Buenas!!!
Muy buena review!!!! Aunque al final no me has dicho nada!!!!
Me sirven mucho los datos para ver donde andan las cosas…
Gracias DJSoliD,
Sorry, me puse en el fin de y quería hacer a esas frecuencias y resoluciones, me en cabezone en hacerlo a el maximo de mi equipo.Si quieres pasame tus resultados a las frecuencias que quieras y hago otra comparativa mas.
Un saludo.
