Test of the Real Nvidia Gtx Titan, single-sli-tri Sli, 4 WAY SLI
-
Ruruloko, I'm sorry but I'm not going to try them, mine without touching anything go from 1200Mhz, I have more than enough. I post them to keep you updated, nothing more. But the people who have tried them love them as they are the standard ones but with voltage modifiable to 1.21 and powertaget idem
-
I'll explain, when flashing the GPUs with the naennon BIOS, if you put the first one, like Pepillo and I have, the graphics card alone goes to 1.21/1200 MHz without touching anything. That is, you start the computer and without opening EVGA or MSI AB, the graphics cards are like that. You just have to open one of those, I use the MSI, I like it better, and increase the power target as much as you see necessary to feed those 1200.
If I don't need them to be at 1200, when I start the Afterburner, I reset it and it lowers them to 1019 in my case.
I don't know if the problem is with the drivers or the programs we use, but they don't read the BIOS parameters correctly. Or there's something in the BIOS that makes those programs take the data incorrectly.
At least I do that, I start the AB, reset it, and the graphics cards go to 1019. If I want them to be at 1200, I set the power target to 135%, Offset +200, and increase the memory.
It may be that the EVGA doesn't do much with the naennon BIOS, there was a user here with problems with the BIOS too.
If you try the ones that majo has posted, let us know how it goes…...
Best regards..
Indeed I put the first one, with a voltage of 1.21 and GPU 1200 MHz. The truth is that the EVGA Precision and the AB read totally incorrect values with that BIOS, however with the reference BIOS it doesn't happen. Right now I have both, with the EVGA SC BIOS, and they reach 1.2 mv. Tomorrow the blocks arrive, I can't wait to tinker XD. Look at that Alphacool block, it would be great for your workblog…...
Jotole, do you know if you have reached better frequencies by putting the blocks??
Regards.
Ruruloko, I'm sorry but I won't try them, mine without touching anything go over 1200 MHz, they are more than enough for me. I post them to keep you updated, nothing more. But the people who have tried them love them since they are the stock ones but with voltage modifiable to 1.21 and power target idem
Hi majo, I already read pages further back, that you didn't think about modifying them. On one hand I understand that with these BIOS they make the drivers go crazy, but we like to squeeze the components to the maximum not allowed….. XD.
What great beasts you have, without touching voltage they reach 1200?? what ASIC do you have??For now, when I have the blocks, I will try the BIOS that you didn't leave, to see what conclusion I come to with these.
Regards.
-
Indeed I put the first one on, with a voltage of 1.21 and gpu 1200 mhz. The truth is that the evga precision and the AB, were reading me totally incorrect values with that bios, however with the reference bios it doesn't happen to me.
Right now I have both, with the evga sc bios, and it reaches 1.2 mv. Tomorrow the blocks arrive, I'm eager to tinker XD.
Look at that alphacool block, it would suit your workblog…...
Jotole do you know if by putting the blocks you have reached better frequencies??
Regards.
Hi majo, I already read pages further back, that you didn't think about modifying them. On one hand I understand that with these bios what they do is drive the drivers crazy, but it's that we like to squeeze the components to the maximum not allowed….. XD.
What great beasts you have, without touching voltage you reach 1200??? what asic do you have??For now that I have the blocks I will try the bios that you have not left, to see what conclusion I come to with these.
Regards.
What a beauty of a block….!!:ugly::ugly:
Regarding the blocks and frequencies, I couldn't tell you, since I flashed and immediately removed the heatsinks to put the blocks.
What I do know is that two of them overclocked very well, and one not so much. In fact it's the one that now limits my OC. I overclock them all the same, and as a maximum they reach 1228. I always have them at 1200 and until now they haven't given me any problems.
In fact I have them at 1200, in four games, the usual ones we go, for the rest they go perfect at 1019.Best regards.
-
Indeed I put the first one on it, with a voltage of 1.21 and gpu at 1200 mhz. The truth is that the evga precision and the AB, were reading me totally incorrect values with that bios, however with the reference bios it doesn't happen to me.
Right now I have both, with the evga sc bios, and it reaches 1.2 mv. Tomorrow the blocks arrive, I'm eager to tinker XD.
Look at that alphacool block, it would look good on your workblog…...
Jotole do you know if you have reached better frequencies by putting the blocks on??
Regards.
Hi majo, I already read pages further back, that you didn't think about modifying them. On one hand I understand that with these bios what they do is drive the drivers crazy, but it's that we like to squeeze the components to the maximum not allowed….. XD.
What great beasts you have, without touching voltage you reach 1200?? what kind of ASIC do you have??For now when I have the blocks I will try the bios that you haven't left, to see what conclusion I come to with these.
Regards.
That graphics card looks very pretty, Pepillo needs one like that for his death star, it already looks like it's from star wars, you can tell that each time the RL blocks have better aesthetics.
congratulations on those Titans although I don't think we will see one around here with an ASIC of 80% or better.
regards
-
Very pretty that graphic, Pepillo needs that for his death star, it already looks like it's from Star Wars, you can tell that the RL blocks are getting better looking every time.
congratulations on those Titans although I think we won't see one around here with an ASIC of 80% or better.
regards
Here you go one..
, the other two have 69.6 and 72.5, those are Gigas, the one in the image is Evga SC.
But the ones from majo you have to have more….
Salu2..
P.D. God how big it looks without resizing............xD
-
Very pretty that graphic, Pepillo needs that for his death star, it already looks like it's from Star Wars, you can tell that the RL blocks are getting better looking every time.
congratulations on those Titans, although I don't think we'll see one with an 80% ASIC or better around here.
regards
I haven't seen Pepillo's rig, has he uploaded it to any forum?? The block is beautiful, when I first saw it, I thought this would look great on Jotole's rig XD.
Thanks fjavi. As Jotole says, he has one with a very good ASIC, but he needs to have two good cards, since without touching the bios they overclock to over 1200mhz, I have no way of getting there without getting kicked out of the game….;D
regards.
Here you go..
, the other two have 69.6 and 72.5, those are Gigas, the one in the image is the Evga SC.!
But you have to have more of Majo's ones….
regards..
P.D. God, how big it looks without resizing............xD
According to the frequency table on the ASIC, the lowest ones give the same boost as mine at 993Mhz. Let's see if I can reach 1200Mhz with the blocks. First, I'll leave the stock bios and put the blocks, let's see if I notice any difference.
regards.
-
Here you have one..
, the other two have 69.6 and 72.5, those are Gigas, the one in the image is Evga SC.But the ones from majo you have to have more….
Regards..
P.D. God how big it looks without resizing............xD
Well you hit the jackpot, but what a difference between cards, some with less than 65%, let's see what ASIC the 780 have because some could have less than 60%, they will put all the furralla, but if you hit the jackpot with one of 80% it could go up quite a bit.
regards
I haven't seen pepillo's team, has he uploaded it to some forum?? the block is beautiful, at the moment I saw it, I thought this would fit Jotole like a glove XD.
Thanks fjavi. As Jotole says, he has one with a very good ASIC, but majo has to have two good ones, given that without touching the bios they go up to more than 1200mhz, I have no way of getting there without being kicked out of the game….;D
Regards.
Regards.
Here you can see it:
http://foro.noticias3d.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=327461
It's not any kind of Mod like Jotole's but it's good, I meant that as extrella de la muerte he called it, so that block with a Titan would look like a spaceship from Star Wars.
Anyway, the Titan is beautiful with its stock cooling too, but that RL block would look great in many Mods, because of the aesthetics it has.
regards
-
This is not very relevant, but the Asic can be just as important, I already know what it is, but is what GPU-Z shows us really real?
In reality, can a simple program inform you about the quality of a chip?I don't know if I should believe it, since I remember a few months ago there was a version that showed the Asic very badly, each time it showed you a different percentage.
And one last thing, I see that at 80% you call it a lottery, so, I say, between what range of percentages do you classify it as very good, good, regular or bad.
-
It's not very relevant, but the Asic can be just as important, I already know what it is, but is what GPU-Z shows us really real?
Can a simple program really tell you the quality of a chip?I don't know if I should believe it, because I remember a few months ago there was a version that showed the Asic very badly, it kept showing a different percentage every time.
And one last thing, I see that you call 80% a lottery, so, I mean, between what percentage range do you classify it as very good, good, regular or bad.
In the Titans, the best ASIC is proving to be important, there's no need to look at the Asic if the card with turbo gets to 1019mhz it's one of the best Asic, it could be between 79% onwards, the ones at 1006 would be a little worse, but also good cards that will be able to hold that 1200 MHz bios.
It's true that a few months ago with Fermi there were worse Asic according to GPU-Z that overclocked better than others with better Asic but in Kepler and especially Titan it seems that the best ASIC means a better card and better OC.
regards
-
I don't exactly have Titan's, but I do have Kepler, a 680, I've never overclocked them, I have one at 82.3% and the other at 78.8%.
So what do you think, could they reach good clocks?
-
I don't exactly have Titan's, but I do have Kepler, a 680, I've never overclocked them, I have one at 82.3% and the other at 78.8%.
So what do you think, could they reach good clocks?
On GK104 I don't know which ASICs are the best, I'm also not sure if the rule applies as in Titan, the best way to see it would be to look at what boost frequency each card reaches and compare with others that are the same.
If the one at 82% reaches a better frequency with boots as it comes from the factory it's very easy that it can be overclocked a little better, although there's not much difference in ASICs, you can monitor the frequency and see which one reaches more in games, that way you'll see if the one with the best ASIC has a little more boost.
regards
-
Do you reach the 1200 of Stock?, well if so... first congratulations and second ¡¡ vaya tela!!, since I am reading and reading and I think I have not vsito any that does that.
I suppose, or I want to suppose, that these 1200 are enough for you but giving it the +38mv (that is to 1.2 or so, with stock BIOS).
Is that so?.
Greetings.
-
In GK104 I don't know which ASICs are the best, I'm also not sure if the rule is met as in Titan, the best way to see it would be to look at what boost frequency each card reaches and compare with others that are the same.
If the one with 82% reaches a better frequency with boots as it comes from the factory, it's very easy that it could overclock a little better, although there isn't much difference in ASICs, you can monitor the frequency and see which one reaches more in games, that way you'll see if the one with the best ASIC has a little more boost.
regards
Well if the one with 82.3% really has about 26 MHz more (1176) than the one with 78.8% (1150).
Well they are the TwinFrozr versions with factory OC, that is 1058 clocks, but as I say, I haven't really needed to OC them manually. I only asked because of pure curiosity.
But seeing my case, then I suppose that the theory of ASICs can be real, and also for Kepler.
We'll have to try overclocking them manually, see what they can do.
Well, thanks a greeting!!
-
Stradivarius, I haven't touched the voltage, I haven't raised 38mV or anything, because I don't like or want to touch voltages. My Asics are 80.1 and 80.5. The 80.5 one runs at 1215 Mhz long with 1.18V, although I haven't tested it alone yet, so I suppose that SLI will slow it down, but this particular card is a real powerhouse according to my colleague. With the first drivers they were at 1.16V. with RL and with the 320 they went up to 1.20 and 1.18 respectively without me touching anything, just reinstalling the OS and doing a clean installation of everything, and with the latest ones they are still there. I haven't tried to raise 38mV, maybe I will someday, but it's impossible because no matter how much I raise +38mV, they feed with 1.23V or 1.21 respectively. I use the PC very little, I'm not at home right now, but when I spend some time at home I will do more tests. Some of the units tested also did that, I don't know why some do and others don't and I don't think it's just a matter of the ASIC, not at all. It's impossible to access all the core data because Nvidia protects a part of them by fusion and another by encryption.
Jotole, mine don't have more ASICs than one of yours, so this demonstrates that it's not all ASIC in these cards, it has its influence but not all of it -
Ok, thanks "majo" …jeje (in both senses).
But there are things I don't understand about your cards, for example that it goes to 1.18v; since all the default maximum voltage they give is 1.16V; another thing is that they hold up better to OC with this voltage and/or do throttling. So I don't understand that... have you changed the BIOS or something?
I already read that with the 320 they went up to 1.20 and 1.18 but you must have touched some parameter because this is not how it is. I suppose the other users will be able to corroborate this...
Many thanks, and let's see if we can keep putting tests and those things.
Regards.
-
Stradivarius, I have tested more cards than I have and in some the voltages were variable, so I don't think this is strange. From what I read in the forums, between some Titans and others, they do very, very variable things with the boost. At idle, they are all almost the same, but in terms of boost, they are very variable. I don't remember in which forum, I don't know if overclock or which one, where there are many more users than here with Titans, I have seen cases like mine. The only thing I have is the EVGA precision and I used it to show here the graphs and visualize the speeds and voltages of the boost and I assure you that the voltage is not touched and the BIOS less. What I have seen very, very little are graphs that with only 1.18V give 1.215Mhz
-
Of course 1215@1,18V is amazing... but what I really haven't read or seen is the variable voltage "upwards", downwards obviously since it relaxes frequencies and so on... but anyway, I thought the maximum stock voltage for all of them was 1.16v.
Good luck then, but I'm very interested in your tests.
What assembler and ASIC do you have?
Thanks, regards.
-
Stradivarius the voltage I have not touched, I have not raised 38mV or anything since I do not like or want to touch voltages. My Asics are 80,1 and 80,5. The one of 80,5 is set to 1215 Mhz long with 1,18V, although I have not tested it alone so I suppose that SLI will slow it down, but this particular card according to my colleague is a real cannon. With the first drivers they were at 1,16V. with RL and with the 320 they went up to 1,20 and 1,18 respectively without me touching anything, just reinstalling OS and doing a clean installation of everything and with the latest they are still there. I have not tried to raise 38mV, perhaps someday I will do it but it is impossible because no matter how much I raise +38mV they feed with 1,23V or 1,21 respectively. I use the PC very little, now I am not at home, but when I spend a little time at home I will do more tests. Some of the units tested also did that, I do not know why some yes and others no and I do not think it is a matter of the ASIC alone, not at all. It is impossible to access all the core data since Nvidia protects a part of them by fusion and another by encryption.
Jotole mine do not have more ASIC than one of yours so here it is demonstrated that not everything is ASIC in these cards, if it has its influence but not allWell we have already managed to find out something more. I have the SC, I have not managed to test it alone. Let's see if I finish the new mess I have got myself into, and I will do some tests to see where she can go alone...
A greeting... -
Stradivarius the voltage I have not touched, I have not raised 38mV or anything since I do not like or want to touch voltages. My Asics are 80,1 and 80,5. The one of 80,5 is set to 1215 Mhz long with 1,18V, although I have not tested it alone so I suppose that SLI will slow it down, but this particular card according to my colleague is a real cannon. With the first drivers they were at 1,16V. with RL and with the 320 they went up to 1,20 and 1,18 respectively without me touching anything, only reinstalling the OS and doing a clean installation of everything and with the latest they are still there. I have not tried to raise 38mV, perhaps someday I will do it but it is impossible because no matter how much I raise +38mV they feed with 1,23V or 1,21 respectively. I use the PC very little, now I am not at home, but when I spend a little time at home I will do more tests. Some of the units tested also did that, I do not know why some do and others do not and I do not think it is a matter of the ASIC alone, not at all. It is impossible to access all the data of the core since Nvidia protects a part of it by fusion and another by encryption.
Jotole my ones do not have more ASIC than one of yours so here it is demonstrated that not everything is ASIC in these cards., it has its influence but not allWhat beasts you have got majo
Yesterday I put the water blocks, and for the little I could test I have gained something in terms of gpu and memories.
The best part is that before you had to give it wood to the fan so that it did not exceed 70- 80 degrees under load, and now with the blocks it does not exceed 32…..On the other hand I do not know why, when I raise the voltage +38 one gets to 1.2mv and the other to 1.16mv. I have to test the bios to see if I can squeeze everything out of them.
Testing them independently, the one that reached me to 1.2 I managed to submit it to 1200mhz which was impossible for me before, I remind you that mine have a 69% ASIC.
I will continue to do more tests............
Regards.
-
What a great beast you've got there, man
Yesterday I put the water blocks on it, and from the little I could test I've gained something in terms of GPU and memory.
The best part is that before you had to give it full throttle to the fan to keep it from going over 70-80 degrees under load, and now with the blocks it doesn't go over 32…..On the other hand, I don't know why, when I increase the voltage by +38 one goes to 1.2mv and the other to 1.16mv. I need to test the BIOS to see if I can squeeze everything out of them.
Testing them independently, the one that used to go up to 1.2 I was able to push it to 1200mhz which was impossible for me before, remember that mine have a 69% ASIC.
I'll keep doing more tests............
Regards.
Great temperature change from 80 to 32, equally this card has surprised me with its idle temperature with the same tower, my cards had these temperatures
GTX 285 - idle 32º
GTX 580 - idle 28º
GTX Titan - idle 17ºRegards.-
