7990 bottleneck?
-
+1 además tener un Micro "K" sin overclock es pecado ;D
Shhh… no lo digas muy alto :ugly:
With that micro you shouldn't have any bottleneck problems, minimal at worst, you wouldn't even notice it, although with a slight OC you ensure better performance, there will be greater balance processor-graphics.
Saludos
-
My i5 is overclocked to 4.2, I was just wondering if it would work well with stock frequencies ^^
Is a corsair 700w enough for the i5 3570k and the 7990?
-
My i5 is clocked at 4.2, I just wondered if it would work well at stock frequencies ^^
Is a corsair 700w enough for the i5 3570k and the 7990?
hello.
download the 2011 and run the test with O.C and then without O.C and compare.
3DMark - test your graphics card with the gamer's benchmark
here you also have the link with the results of the forum members.
3DMark 11 - Results and Ranking - HardLimit
here you have a program that we usually use to calculate the power needed for a F.A.
http://support.asus.com/PowerSupply.aspx?SLanguage=es-es
it's quite approximate
regards. -
My i5 is overclocked to 4.2, I was just wondering if it would work well with stock frequencies ^^
Is a corsair 700w enough for the i5 3570k and the 7990?
It will work just as well with stock frequencies, although perhaps, and only perhaps, you will experience a minimal loss of performance due to a bottleneck, but I'm talking about a few FPS or something like that, at most.
The power supply is more than enough for that rig.
Regards
-
From my point of view, an oc is necessary so that there is no bottleneck as you say, look at this gaming pc as an example on amazon.uk
It won't have a bottleneck with that equipment, if anything, when you overclock it, it might perform a little more, but that processor with turbo already has a respectable frequency, besides, the ivy architecture is good with its pcie3 and all, in short, it shouldn't have a bottleneck, especially at 1080p or higher, also at lower resolutions, what is true is that if you overclock the CPU, it will render a little more, but it's not because of a bottleneck, it's because the equipment is faster.
If you're thinking of buying the 7990 now, I would wait, a 300€ discount is being announced, I don't think it will take long to apply, if you look around the internet, you'll see that a significant price drop is being announced.
-
well, let's see, bottleneck, in what sense? because the only thing that slows down that team is the memory. that the kinstong are not the panacea in terms of performance. a memory at 1866 and 8gb you will gain more points than by overclocking the processor. and if you also put an nvidia as a secondary and configure it only for physx... better than better. since you unload even more the main processor and the main memory. then an ssd for the operating system and the game is not crazy. since today. the only real bottleneck in computers are the hard drives of all time. (sorry for the long text.)
https://bm.hardlimit.com/result.php?bm=337b052b429b9ff0c9c273d820385d4675
-
The memory is not enough for pipes, the OC to the micro is what matters. -
well, let's see, bottleneck, in what sense? because the only thing that slows down that team are the memories. that the kinstong are not the panacea in terms of performance. with a memory at 1866 and 8gb you will gain more points than by overclocking the processor. and if you also put an nvidia as a secondary and configure it only for physx… better than better. since you unload even more the main processor and the main memory. then an ssd for the operating system and the game is not crazy. since today. the only real bottleneck in computers are the hard drives of all time. (sorry for the long text.)
I think it doesn't matter memory at 1600 or 2000mhz I'm talking about the performance of a 7990 on an ivy or an SB, it's that even an 920 oceado or a 950 would already do well with that card.
Another thing would be to put 4 780 or 680 that being so many cards a memory at 2400 MHz could influence, but that is also compensated with a good OC to the CPU, then the Nvidia will only be worth it for PhysX games, for example the two Batman, Mafia II or games like that, in most it won't matter, you will only notice it in PhysX games for GPU, there are not many games that have it.
But there is good kingston memory as well as any other brand has many models, all brands use similar chips, depending on the frequency or latency they can have a chip, but they can be the same chip in many brands.
regards
-
I think that memory at 1600 and 2000mhz makes no difference when talking about the performance of a 7990 on an ivy or an SB, because even an 920 overclocked or an 950 would already perform well with that card.
It would be different if you put 4 780 or 680, because with so many cards, a memory at 2400 mhz could influence, but that would also be compensated with a good CPU OC, then the Nvidia would only be useful for PhysX games, for example the two Batman games, Mafia II or games like that, in most cases it would not matter, you would only notice it in PhysX games for GPU, there are not many games that have that.
But there is good Kingston memory as well as any other brand has many models, all brands use similar chips, depending on the frequency or latency they can have a chip, but they can be the same chip in many brands.
regards
Compare the same graphics card with a 1600Mhz 4gb ram or with 8gb at 1866Mhz… see if there is a difference or not.
https://bm.hardlimit.com/result.php?bm=337b052b429b9ff0c9c273d820385d4675
-
1 FPS… 2?
Seriously, a few MHz in micro will give you better minimums.
-
Compara la misma grafica con una memoria ram de 1600Mhz 4gb o con 8gb a 1866Mhz… a ver si hay o no diferencia.
It's not the same amount as speed, there are games that can already fill 4GB of RAM and the system will run more relaxed with 8 for example. Even so, in terms of FPS it's not always noticeable as long as you reach the minimum requirements. But in terms of speed, the difference is almost nil, and if we go further and talk about latencies (or quality) as in the old days, today it has become irrelevant.
On the other hand, the CPU issue, as has been discussed on several occasions, directly affects the FPS that a game gives, although it depends on which one, in some there is very little difference while in others there is quite a bit.
-
Compare the same graphics with a 1600Mhz 4gb ram or with 8gb at 1866Mhz… to see if there is a difference or not.
The game will not be influenced by the frequency, if the game asks for more memory then it will perform better with 8GB but you won't notice much difference between having them at 1600 or 1866, even if you put 16Gb you can assign the paging file to the memory and it would be a little faster, but the graphics configuration you have will always have a big influence and what you notice the most is the CPU, a CPU at 4600 will be noticeable faster than one at 3800, I mean in games, it will have better minimums.
Then there is the other case I mentioned if you put four 7970s or four 780s, of course it will appreciate that the computer is very powerful, CPU at 4800 and memory at 2400mhz, but it's because three or four cards will demand the maximum from the CPU and memory, although the higher the resolution the less it demands from the CPU and more from the graphics.
regards
