• Portada
    • Recientes
    • Usuarios
    • Registrarse
    • Conectarse

    I have an NVIDIA GTX 980 Ti

    Programado Fijo Cerrado Movido Tarjetas Gráficas
    12 Mensajes 3 Posters 3.2k Visitas 1 Watching
    Cargando más mensajes
    • Más antiguo a más nuevo
    • Más nuevo a más antiguo
    • Mayor número de Votos
    Responder
    • Responder como tema
    Accede para responder
    Este tema ha sido borrado. Solo los usuarios que tengan privilegios de administración de temas pueden verlo.
    • JavisoftJ Desconectado
      Javisoft Veteranos HL @Ciclito
      Última edición por

      If you can run Tomb Raider at 1080p to see which one gives you better results, so I can compare XD.

      C 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
      • C Desconectado
        Ciclito @Javisoft
        Última edición por

        @Javisoft:

        If you can pass the tomb raider to 1080p to see what gives you better, so I can compare XD.

        The parameters are the same as in guru 3d (and at 1080p)

        "This particular test has the following enabled:

        DX11
        Ultra Quality mode
        FX AA enabled
        16x AF enabled
        Hair Quality Normal (TressFX disabled)
        Tessellation On
        SSAO Ultra"

        Here they are, the first one stock:

        With Oc at 1500mhz + 450 memos:

        1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
        • W Desconectado
          wwwendigo @Ciclito
          Última edición por

          @Ciclito:

          I've tried the btf4 at 1440p native with the resolution scale at 200% and everything on ultra and the damn thing was moving it from 40 to 50 fps without antialiasing of course. And then I wanted to take it to the extreme I put 5120 x 2880 without antialiasing, in medium options with the scale at 200% which would be like 10K and it was moving it from 17 to 20 fps… ratataaaa the surprising thing has been that it has been enough with the 6144megas of vram in those extreme conditions, that is if I had it overclocked in memos 1400mhz above its clock.

          You can look for some jagged effect.... [qmparto]

          For those who have doubts if 6144megas of vram are enough in 4k… you will see that it doesn't even reach 6gigas in extreme conditions of 5k even with antialiasing and in 10k in high medium without AA. Before you run out of Vram
          you go to 15/20 fps and it becomes unplayable not for lack of it, but for the graphic power of the chip that can't give any more if the poor thing... :nono:
          I leave that for the defenders of the 12 gigas of the titanX who said that 6 gigas is little... :risitas:

          But what an animal you are Ciclito…. :osvaisacagar:

          Almost 60 Megapixels per frame. "Sometimes I see pixels"... :ugly:

          C 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
          • C Desconectado
            Ciclito @wwwendigo
            Última edición por

            @wwwendigo:

            But what an animal you are Ciclito…. :osvaisacagar:

            Almost 60 Megapixels per frame. "Sometimes I see pixels"... :ugly:

            If :ugly: I also... I wanted to check it out because of a discussion I had with people who had the Titan X and said that 6 gigabytes were scarce... well I already knew that wasn't true because I came from the Titan Black and from playing in native 4K for a year and a half... but the mems in the Black didn't go up as much as these... and I wanted to retest this game under the same conditions and confirm that it holds up more thanks to that extra OC in mems.

            Zoom in and look for any sawtooth :ugly: they look perfect and that's in jpg that if I capture them in bmp quality they take up 50 megs each....:sisi:

            JavisoftJ 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
            • JavisoftJ Desconectado
              Javisoft Veteranos HL @Ciclito
              Última edición por

              I'm going to put mine on air:

              A 67% more, not bad ?

              By the way, on guru3d it gives 192 fps in reference and 221 in G1, I don't know how you get 231...

              http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=16057&admin=0a8fcaad6b03da6a6895d1ada2e171002a287bc1

              http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=16319

              And then at 2K you give 9 fps less.

              C 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
              • C Desconectado
                Ciclito @Javisoft
                Última edición por

                @Javisoft:

                I'm going to put mine through its paces:

                A 67% more, not bad ?

                By the way, on guru3d it gives 192 fps in reference and 221 in G1, I don't know how you get 231...

                http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=16057&admin=0a8fcaad6b03da6a6895d1ada2e171002a287bc1

                http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=16319

                And then at 2K you get 9 fps less.

                My g1 gaming does 1354 mhz with boost 2.0 from its 1150mhz base clock. We would have to see what boost the guru3d one had, surely something lower than mine. Hence the difference.

                The 154 fps is clearly that they got it wrong, especially at 1440p, analyze it, their ref gives 139 fps up to 154, I tell you that you don't reach by increasing 150 mhz of the base clock.

                I go from 1354 without memos to 1500mhz +450 memos, I go up 17 fps. On the other hand, note that their benchmark is at 1920 x 1200 and mine at 1920 x 1080. That also counts in my favor.

                JavisoftJ 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
                • JavisoftJ Desconectado
                  Javisoft Veteranos HL @Ciclito
                  Última edición por

                  @Ciclito:

                  My g1 gaming does 1354 mhz with the boost 2.0 from its 1150mhz base clock. We would have to see what boost the guru 3d had, surely something inferior to mine. Hence the difference.

                  That's what I've been thinking, but since you give fewer fps at 2K, it really surprises me, the 980Ti bug is biting me but I'm resisting, which is bad ;D

                  C 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
                  • C Desconectado
                    Ciclito @Javisoft
                    Última edición por

                    3DMARK 11 PERFORMANCE single 980ti (bios de stock)

                    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

                    C 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
                    • C Desconectado
                      Ciclito @Ciclito
                      Última edición por

                      Batman Arkham Knight 2160p/1440p/1080p max settings benchmarking 980ti G1 Gaming

                      !


                      !

                      !

                      ! Batman Arkham Knight 980TI G1 Gaming Gameplay.
                      ! The game doesn't run very smoothly and eats up a lot of VRAM even at 1080p.
                      ! Batman Arkham Knight 980TI G1 Gaming Gameplay.
                      !

                      Salu2

                      C 1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
                      • C Desconectado
                        Ciclito @Ciclito
                        Última edición por

                        NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

                        NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

                        FIRE STRIKE 1.1 sli 980ti

                        NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

                        NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

                        1 Respuesta Última respuesta Responder Citar 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Foreros conectados [Conectados hoy]

                        1 usuarios activos (1 miembros y 0 invitados).
                        febesin, pAtO,

                        Estadísticas de Hardlimit

                        Los hardlimitianos han creado un total de 543.5k posts en 62.9k hilos.
                        Somos un total de 34.9k miembros registrados.
                        roymendez ha sido nuestro último fichaje.
                        El récord de usuarios en linea fue de 123 y se produjo el Thu Jan 15 2026.