The RAM is there to be used

[krampak]

Packo's bet is the same! (and with the same RAM usage :lol:)

(yes... stolen from the internet xD)

[Yorus]

If you want to take up RAM, just do a clean install of Windows 7 and let Windows Update do the rest...

[amd125]

I still remember the first Dual Core I had. An AMD 939 3800x2, I could see that it had two cores, I could record a DVD and keep working on the PC, something I couldn't do with a single core, and I already thought it was amazing

In terms of micro speed, things haven't evolved much in recent years, but in terms of cores, things have been interesting.

[packosoft]

come to kiss my shiny metallic ass, let's see who has the biggest one for real :troll:

[krampak]

Wait… what??? 128 cores and 2TB of RAM? :ugly::ugly::ugly: They won't let you run wPrime on it by chance, right? :chuckles:

[packosoft]

@krampak:

Wait… what??? 128 cores y 2TB de RAM? :ugly::ugly::ugly: No te dejarán pasarle el wPrime por casualidad no? :risitas:

2TB no, no seas exagerao. Solo 1.91 ;D
y por qué no iban a dejarme? :troll:
se me queda percha al detectar el hardware :ugly:
Por lo demás…
En el de 32MB no le da tiempo a sacar todo su potencial y como la frecuencia de reloj tampoco es la leche pues se queda muuuuy lejos
saca 9.6" o así
En el de 1024M, record =P


Pero como no me detecta el hardware no se por qué, no puedo apuntarme el tanto :mudo:

[krampak]

You could premiere category on HWBot.org, to date there are only entries up to 96 cores ;D (23.3 seconds the WR with 60 cores).

PD: Maybe the HWInfo64 detects it well.

[packosoft]

[Fassou]

1,91TB of RAM

But then there's the thing about the micros, which are 4 micros with 8 cores each and ¿ 64 threads each? or is it the total (because then I don't know where the 128 virtual ones come from :mudo: )

Salu2! or the great Mr. Admin of Skynet

[krampak]

@Fassou:

1,91TB of RAM

But then there's the thing about the micros, which are 4 micros with 8 cores each and ¿ 64 threads each? or is that the total (because then I don't know where the 128 virtual ones come from :mudo: )

Salu2! or the great Mr. Admin of Skynet

Yes, it says so in the CPUZ screenshot, 8 cores and 64 threads per processor. I didn't even know about the existence of CPUs with 8 threads per core :ugly:

[Yorus]

Let's see if the CPU-Z gets confused, in Ark Intel it says that they are 18 cores and 36 threads, two threads per core.

Intel® Xeon® Processor E7-8880 v3 (45M Cache, 2.30 GHz) Specifications

but I also can't figure out the 128 virtual ones :(

[cobito]

Sir? I bow at your feet

@Yorus:

Let's see if the CPU-Z is confused, in Ark Intel it says that they are 18 cores and 36 threads, two threads per core.

Intel® Xeon® Processor E7-8880 v3 (45M Cache, 2.30 GHz) Specifications

but I also can't make the 128 virtual ones fit :(

I think Windows 2012 is limited to 64 physical processors.

[Yorus]

It's a Server 2012, but it seems to have the same limitation:

Windows Server 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit: I didn't say anything, I had read Windows 10 :facepalm:. Well, that explains everything.

[krampak]

Packo has invalidated your result on hwbot, they ask for another cpuz with the memory tab open and that the version of wPrime is 1.55 :wall:

[packosoft]

@krampak:

Packo has invalidated your result on hwbot, they ask for another cpuz with the memory tab open and that the version of wPrime is 1.55 :wall:

yeah, I've seen it already… Well, it will be again. I can't be being an idiot because the guy of the moment wants windows 2008...

[rul3s]

@Yorus said in The RAM is there to be used:

If you want to use up RAM, just do a clean install of Windows 7 and let Windows Update do the rest...

And let him read this BRILLIANT answer now.... give this man a cookie!!