Recommend me a graphic to play for several years
-
GTX 670 OC 4GB: http://www.pccomponentes.com/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_670_oc_4gb_gddr5.html
or
GTX 770 OC 2GB: http://www.pccomponentes.com/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_770_oc_2gb_gddr5.html
I know that the one that gives the most FPS is the GTX 770 but will it last longer or will the 670 last longer for the 4GB?
[FOR RESOLUTION 1920X1080] [1080p] (1080p MAX, or less since I don't know the screen my friend has (according to the 24" one, that is 1080p).
-
GTX 670 OC 4GB : http://www.pccomponentes.com/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_670_oc_4gb_gddr5.html
o
GTX 770 OC 2GB: http://www.pccomponentes.com/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_770_oc_2gb_gddr5.html
ya se que la que más FPS dá és la gtx 770 pero en años también durará más o durará más la 670 por los 4gb?
[PARA RESOLUCIÓN 1920X1080] [1080p] (1080p MAX, o menos ya que no se la pantalla que tiene mi amigo (segun el de 24" o sea 1080p).
Supuestamente la GTX 670 garantizaría mejor su duración en cuanto a rendimiento sostenido en el tiempo, sin embargo la diferencia más que apreciable de rendimiento contra la GTX 770, y el mejor acabado de la última (PCB más complejo, disipador similar o mejor), asegura que la segunda mantenga un rendimiento por encima en toda situación donde no haya problemas con la VRAM.
Que sinceramente, no creo que se presenten de forma real sin hundir el rendimiento en ambas gráficas. La GTX 770 es mejor tarjeta, si tan interesado estás en los 4 GB yo apuntaría a por una GTX 770 de 4 GB, que deberían salir por un precio poco superir a esa GTX 670 y con un extra de rendimiento que, éste sí, podría garantizar algo mejor que se le sacaría partido a esta gráfica.
No hay que olvidar que para poder usar tanta VRAM implica necesariamente un mayor consumo de ancho de banda, y en ese sentido la GTX 770, además de la potencia extra en la GPU, tiene memorias más rápidas que son mayor garante de que se usen correctamente, los 2GB completos o muchos más en un futuro hipotético con un modelo de 4 GB.
-
I still believe that a single card will run out of power before it runs out of vram, if we're talking about two or three, then it's better to have than to wish for, but I certainly won't pay more for a 670 now, even if it has 8gb of memory, I'll wait for the 680s to drop in price or for the 770s to come out with 4Gb.
The vram, except in very exceptional cases like using a lot of mods, for example F1 2012 or Skyrim, won't be used up with a single graphics card, before that it will have to lower options due to lack of power, although if you want to be safe, wait for the 770 with 4Gb, but I wouldn't pay more now for a 670 or a 680, I don't care how much vram they have, I prefer more power.
Of course I'm talking about using only one graphics card, not thinking about SLI, or very high resolutions, because I think the vram still depends on the power of the graphics card, but to be safe, I think the 770 with 4Gb is better, the 670 and 680 might be worth it when they cost less than the 770, the current price of some 670s and 680s is crazy.
I'll wait a few days to buy a 670 like these.
Access Denied
Access DeniedIt's no longer worth paying more for a 670 or a 680.
Seeing this, I think the 670s and 680s will have to drop a lot in price if they want to sell.
Access Denied
Access DeniedP.D I don't know if there are problems with that store I put, if there are, delete it and I won't put it again.
regards
-
hello, it seems like I'm the radical ;D my answer is ….. none.
the "useful" life of a graphics card is usually between a year and a half to two years, after that you are totally outdated. as of today I have the series 6 and the series 7 is coming out (which even though it's a "rehash" or better "a Reassembly" as they say around here) will perform better than the series 6 and next year or so they will release the series 8, and if today games like the Metro - Last Light ask for a 690 or a titan today, in two or three years any game will make fun of a 770 :troll: it's sad, it's unfortunate, but it is what it is. the one with more brute force lasts longer, I've put up with this one this year a GTX280 and I left it because it was noisy, because of consumption, because it didn't support directX 11 because in BF3 it could be a real torture. and the 660 solved all that for me, but I know it's not comparable a 280 with a 660 (the 280 was the top of the range in mono GPU and the 660 is the first of the mid-range is it going to last me as many years as the 280? I don't think so, I suppose an SLI will come down
regards.
P.D sorry for the long post. in summary the more "beast" the graphics card is the more time it will allow you some reasonable FPS, and pray that they don't release another directX :ugly: -
I stick with the 770. It's a better-made 680, much more refined in pcb, cooling and gpu. And if you look for it with 4gb, when it falls short you put in an sli and run. -
hello, it seems like I'm the radical ;D my answer is ….. none.
the "useful" life of a graphics card is usually between a year and a half to two years, after that you are totally outdated. as of today I have the series 6 and the series 7 is coming out (which even though it's a "remake" or better "a Reassembly" as they say around here) will render more than the series 6 and next year or so they will release the series 8, and if today games like the Metro - Last Light ask for a 690 or a titan today, in two or three years any game will make fun of a 770 :troll: it's sad, it's lamentable, but it is like that. the one that lasts longer is the one with more brute force, I've put up with this GTX280 for a year and I left it because it was noisy, for consumption, for not supporting directX 11 because in BF3 it could be a torment. and the 660 solved all that for me, but I know that a 280 is not comparable to a 660 (the 280 was the top of the range in mono GPU and the 660 is the first of the medium range ¿will it last me as many years as the 280? I don't think so, I suppose an SLI will come out
regards.
P.D sorry for the long post. in short the more "beast" the graphics card is the more time it will allow you to have reasonable FPS, and pray that they don't release another directX :ugly:I don't agree, it's true that new games can't be maxed out, but with a 470 I play Metro LL, bioshock, sleeping dogs and the latest games pretty well, the 470 is a few years old, also with two 480 I play even better with more graphic quality.
what should be clear is that in two years it will be more difficult to max everything out, but perhaps you can play in high with FXAA, it will be a matter of adjusting the options but to play there are people who do it with a 4870 or a 260 and they are already years old, it's up to each one what they settle for, because if you want to max everything out you know you have to update much more, if you settle for playing decently you can stretch the graphics and equipment much more.
another option is to buy when a new generation of graphics has already come out and buy the previous range on offer, you can put together two for what it costs to put together one from the start.
regards
-
Fjavi
that's what I'm waiting for, for the 660 to drop in price.
but things as they are, with a 260 I doubt anyone will play properly on an FB3 in multiplayer, of course that anyone who today has a 260 for 40/50 euros will set up an SLI or for something more a TRI, but I don't think that's the solution. The bigger "the donkey" is, the more years it will last, the other option is mid-range and you change it every year without losing too much money.
regards -
I don't agree, it's true that new games can't be maxed out, but with a 470 I play Metro LL, bioshock, sleeping dogs and the latest games pretty well, the 470 is a few years old, also with two 480 I play even better with more graphic quality.
what should be clear is that in two years it will be more difficult to set everything very high, but maybe you can play at high with FXAA, it will be a matter of adjusting the options but to play there are people who do it with a 4870 or a 260 and they are already years old, it's up to each one with what they are satisfied with because if you want to set everything to the max you know you have to update much more, if you are satisfied with playing decently you can stretch the graphics and equipment much more.
another option is to buy when a new generation of graphics has already come out and buy the previous range on offer, you can set up two for what it costs to set up one from the start.
regards
So you see, I first played Metro in the middle with a cheap dual core and a 4850 overclocked xD and the 6850 has allowed me to play The Witcher 2 with almost everything maxed out and Sleeping more of the same, let's hope Last Light goes well
If you don't mind paying for a 770, go for it. If you think more about your wallet, wait for a 760 plain or Ti and don't stretch it for many years or set up an SLI later.
I would skip the 4GB, if anything a 660Ti with 3.
-
Fjavi
that's what I'm waiting for, for the 660 to drop in price.
but as things are, with a 260 I seriously doubt anyone will play FB3 in multi, of course that anyone who today has a 260 for 40/50 euros will set up an SLI or for something more a TRI, but I don't think that's the solution. The bigger the "donkey" the more years it will last, the other option is mid-range and you change it every year without losing too much money.
regardsI already know that a 260 can't be played well anymore, I mean from my point of view but I wanted to refer to that some people are less demanding, that's why if they have to lower options they won't care as much.
Also an SLI of 260 is no longer worth it, no matter how cheap it may be but maybe one of 660ti or 670 is interesting, CF of 7950 if they start to see breaking deals, you can set up something powerful without spending a fortune, that's why I also referred that sometimes it's better to buy already when something is "outdated" this from the point of view that a new generation has already come out.
Because certainly from a 660ti to a 760ti there isn't that much performance difference for the 660Ti to be outdated, if the 660 ti were found much cheaper it would definitely be worth it, the same will happen with 670 or 680 if liquidations are seen, very good prices so they will definitely be worth it more than 760Ti or 770.
I mean SLI or CF but with one you can play decently, but I'm referring to those breaking deals that you put two for little money, as happened with the 470 or 480.
Well you see, the first metro I played in the middle with an economical dual core and a 4850 overclocked xD and the 6850 has given me to play The witcher 2 with almost everything turned up and Sleeping more of the same, let's hope that Last Light goes well
If you don't mind paying for a 770, go for it. If you think more about your wallet wait for a 760 plain or Ti and don't stretch it many years or set up an SLI later.
I would skip the 4GB, if anything a 660Ti of 3.
I have a computer with a 260, although I only use it for old games, anyway games like Mafia 2 go well or the first Batman although these with a 9800 for physics, also at 1050p, the only thing is that if you get used to something better then it's hard to go back, but I've played GTA IV with that card that is with drops to 30 fps, but much better than on console, but with the Q6600 at 3600 it was playable although not as with other more powerful computers.
Then Metro LL seems to me less demanding than Metro 2033, besides it looks better, we're going that the first one doesn't move well on a 470 no matter how crazy, with Metro LL if I play like that although in exteriors I've already seen more drops, indoors it goes pretty decent, without advanced physics and without tessellation at maximum, but it defends itself, it also looks good.
regards
-
…Then Metro LL to me seems less demanding than Metro 2033, besides it looks better, let's say that the first one doesn't run it in high on a 470 even if you're crazy, with Metro LL if I play like that although outdoors I've already seen more drops, indoors it goes pretty decent, without advanced physics and without tessellation at maximum, but it holds its own, it also looks good...
What a luxury, I feel like getting it on the band :ugly:
-
De lujoo, I want to catch it by the band :ugly:
well if it keeps getting cheaper at this rate …. I think it will be when you retire Obione ;D
greetings
P.D I'm about to replay the 2033 -
If I do arrive, I won't have quoted enough :hangover:
