Super PI Test (The 30 fastest PCs from HardLimit)

[Bm4n]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Yo recuerdo un loco que lo tenía en la nevera… :risitas:

[jordiqui]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Core i7 3770K 490X100 4900MHZ Vcore 1,272 RAM 800Mhz 9-9-9-24 16.754s

La primera aportacion desde hace unos añitos. Carai como corre esto XD.

Core i7 3770K@5000Mhz 1,28V (50X100) 800Mhz 9-9-9-24 (RL) 16.427s

[krampak]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

El voltaje es correcto?

[jordiqui]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

@krampak:

El voltaje es correcto?

Pues viendo los voltajes que se usan no deberia serlo. Pero como puse en el hilo de overclocking asrock z77 pro4 fui subiendo de 0,65 cada 200Mhz con 5Ghz lo tuve que subir a ese valor y me lo paso. Entonces a partir de ahi no podia subir. Lo que no entiendo es porque narices tienen ese PLL de la Cpu tan alto, 1,8 imagino que esta arquitectura asi lo requiere o es por el hecho de subir a 3,9 si se tiene activado el turbo. Pero si es correcto. Como es correcto que estan en single channel porque no le da la gana de pillarme el otro canal. Tengo que desmontar ( primero limpiare los slots y las memos) pero tengo que mirar los pines del socket o si hay un mal contacto entre cpu y socket aunque las temperaturas las veo correctas. En fin krampak, me las veia con poder subir esto mucho mas pero el umbral de 5 Ghz no lo pasa y ahora estoy liado con solventar la ram y despues acabar de montar bases y libros. Despues me animare a volver a intentar pasar otro, porque no entiendo como la gente tiene 1,5 y a mi me paso esto a 1,2-1,3 ( como el cpu-z indica). vaya rollo he soltado para decir que el voltaje es correcto segun el cpu-z claro, porque sin verificarlo de forma mecaninca no me lo creo.

[jordiqui]

This post is being processed/translated. The original version will be shown:

Lo siento rules pero antes d devolver la placa era irresistible no subir un poco el Bclk para probar bajar de 16. No he podido, aunque casi. :ugly::ugly::ugly:

Core i7 3770K @5147Mhz 1,38 (103x50) 823Mhz @ 9-9-9-24 (RL) 16,037s

[krampak]

Well, I've tried to give it a second squeeze to my 2500k but there's no human way to start at 5Ghz, and I've managed to pass Prime95 at 4.9Ghz… there must be an internal problem with the number 5 xD
Testing the new motherboard and RL (the hydro H70 is not much, it's saved because it had the detail of 190cfm's and the window open... but more or less like the noctua nh14).

Sandy Bridge 2500K @ 4.90Ghz 1.59V (100x49) 1066Mhz @ 9-10-9-28 (RL) -> 17,495''

[deeiivid]

@krampak:

Well, I've tried to give a second squeeze to my 2500k but there's no human way to boot at 5Ghz, and I've managed to pass Prime95 at 4.9Ghz… there must be some internal problem with the number 5 xD
Testing the new motherboard and RL (the hydro H70 is not much, but it's okay because it had the detail of 190cfm's and the window open... but more or less like the noctua nh14).

Sandy Bridge 2500K @ 4.90Ghz 1.59V (100x49) 1066Mhz @ 9-10-9-28 (RL) -> 17,495''

The hydro is not much to call it RL.
I've dismantled mine, because I've changed the tower. I'll sell it soon, when I feel like taking pictures of the parts :ugly: :ugly:

By the way, what a nice little rig you have built…

[shilmar]

Hello

here I leave you the photo of my first tests
Ivy Bridge 3770k @ 4.566Ghz 1.24V (101,5x45) 811Mhz @ 9-9-9-24 (Air) -> 17,846''

as this is with a noctua d14 I don't think it would go much higher than this, but I haven't tested

[dantang]

¡Esta publicación está eliminada!

[shilmar]

more tests
Ivy Bridge 3770k @ 4.756Ghz 1.28V (103,5x46) 827Mhz @ 9-9-9-24 (Air) -> 17,145''
stabilizing it with the multi to 47 requires +1,30 of vcore and I don't see it clear

[ferelxyx]

Ivy Bridge 3570k @ 4.60Ghz 1.29V (100x49) 800Mhz @ 9-9-9-27 (Aire) -> 18,429''

saludos

[giwei]

¡Esta publicación está eliminada!

[krampak]

You forgot to make the capture with the ferelxyx loops.

[Pablus77]

[wanautentico]

My result of AMD Phenom II x4 945 @ 3600 - 46.551 s

**I also see a curiosity, why does the FX-8350 with 8 cores have a longer time than my Phenom?
On top of that, it's at a frequency of 4.415 Mhz.

This software must not be very reliable.**

[Bm4n]

@wanautentico:

It must not be very reliable this software.

For me, of the most, of course it is single-threaded, hence the problems of the FX-8. The multi-core alternative is wPrime. But I already told you that apart from being simple it is the most reliable, to my liking.

[Franziskaner]

well then with the new gadget

by air
regards

[X_360]

When I assemble a new team, I'll check if I have any of the 2500k… and now that I'm on a laptop, I'll give it my all on the benches, even if it's just to score something ¬¬

[Critical Power]

What a nice ranking I'm glad to participate. I already left the cap in the cold topic but just in case...

[jordiqui]

Pachard Bell EasyNote TS Core i5- 2430M 2400Mhz@2800Mhz Ram DDR3 667Mhz–---------29.375s

Hola compi, falta algún dato en la captura?
;D