Test of the Real Nvidia Gtx Titan, single-sli-tri Sli, 4 WAY SLI
-
Pues si, me va a 1006. Comprobado hace un momento. Otra cosa, no he hecho nunca overclock a una grafica. Alguna guia que me podais recomendar? o si me quieres dar tus valores pepillo, y los pruebo? al ser de la misma franja en la tabla, seguramente seran parecidas.
Un saludo!Lee esto primero:
GPU Boost 2.0 - Funcionamiento y overclock de la Geforce Titan - HardLimit
Mis valores de overclock no te servirían porque le cambié la bios.
Saludos
-
Well yes, it goes to 1006. Verified a moment ago. Another thing, I have never overclocked a graphics card. Any guide you can recommend? or if you want to give me your values pepillo, and I try them? since they are from the same range in the table, they will probably be similar.
Best regards!I agree with the colleagues, I have one with that ASIC, another with less and another with more. And it will go up to 1200 + or -, a pretty decent OC.
Raising a GPU is very similar to a CPU in the basic principles.
You need the EVGA Precision or the MSI Afterburner, a program to test, for example the Unigine 4.0, and patience.
.Always monitor the temperatures of the graphics card. Change the fan profile, remove the automatic from the OC program you use, and set it to 60%, for example. I wouldn't let it exceed 85º, do tests and if you need to increase the fan more, do it.
Increase the Core by 5 or 10, and check stability with Unigine 4.0, for example. (Any benchmark will help you get an idea if it's stable.)
Increase until the card hangs.
When it hangs, apply voltage to the core, the Titan can be increased up to +37mv. Increase by 5 at a time. And start increasing the v core again from the point where it hung without increasing voltage.
When you reach the maximum OC that the card allows, you can do the same with the memories. In the Titans, it gives much better results to increase the core than the memories, so don't worry too much about that.
When you have the maximum OC you can achieve, lower it by 10 or 15 Mhz. It doesn't mean anything in games and it's a small margin so that the card doesn't go to the limit.
Even so, it may be that you encounter a game or benchmark that is not stable with that frequency, don't worry, lower it another 10 Mhz, and enjoy it…............. ;).
It's not a guide like the ones you can find out there, but to start it's already good enough............ ;).
Best regards...
P.D. Of course read what Pepillo has indicated, to know how this card works…....... ;).
-
Thanks for the link Patagonico, it will be more viable to get hold of screens of that type right away and it's good to know what we're up against with those 4K resolutions, for now a surround of that kind I wouldn't even look at….......:ugly:
Salu2...
Logic dictates that the performance should be half of what you have now, for example Crysis 3 tests it at High resolution giving it an average of 25 fps, I tried with Ultra resolution and my average is 15 fps, FC3 in Ultra gets 20 fps and my game rejects the 3840x2160p configuration.
I don't know much about Surround maybe you can configure it by downsampling to 3840x2160 at 30Hz another configuration should fail, but logic would say that the performance should be between 10-20 fps in most cases.-
Salu2.-
-
Logic dictates that the performance should be half of what you have now, for example, I tested Crysis 3 at High resolution giving it an average of 25 fps, I tried with Ultra resolution and my average is 15 fps, FC3 at Ultra gets 20 fps and my game rejects the 3840x2160p configuration.
I don't know much about Surround, maybe you can configure it for downsampling to 3840x2160 at 30Hz, another configuration should fail, but logic would say that performance should be between 10-20 fps in most cases.
Salu2.
I would swear that much less Patagonico. Already in the jump from 5760 x 1080 to the current 7680 x 1440p, I had half the performance with the 670. In a supposed surround of 11520 x 2160p (The mother of all….:ugly:). The performance jump would be much larger. It would be a real barbarity, that current hardware wouldn't move in any way. It will lack many generations of processors and graphics, to be able to move that.
Currently I move all games in ultra, between 55/60 Metro 2033, about 50 Crysis 3
Those are the only two that I move scraping the 60 fps, the rest above 80 BF3, sleeping dogs, MoH Warfighter, and those of its class, and above 100 the ones that consume less resources or are older.
Now, if a 4k screen like that is within reach, I will definitely try it, having many inches and that resolution, must be a joy to play. Although I am in love with surround, I would give a chance to one of those....
I read your article about downsampling, maybe I'll get motivated and try it, to see how that resolution makes my pc pale....
If you tested that configuration on a single monitor and got 20 fps in a game, divide that by three, and more or less that's how it would move. Although I have more graphics power than you, I suppose I would move them in those 20 fps you mention......
It's totally unfeasible.......
Un Saludo...
-
I swear that much less Patagonico. Already in the jump from 5760 x 1080 to the current 7680 x 1440p, I had half the performance with the 670. In a hypothetical surround of 11520 x 2160p (The mother of all….:ugly:) the performance jump would be much bigger. It would be a real monstrosity, that current hardware wouldn't handle in any way. We're still many generations of processors and graphics away from being able to handle that.
Currently I run all games on ultra, between 55/60 in Metro 2033, about 50 in Crysis 3
Those are the only two that I run scraping 60 fps, the rest above 80 in BF3, Sleeping Dogs, MoH Warfighter, and those in its class, and above 100 in those that consume fewer resources or are older.
Now, if I come across one of those 4k screens, I'll definitely try it. Having many inches and that resolution must be a joy to play. Although I'm a lover of surround, I'd give one of those a try....
I read your article on downsampling, maybe I'll be inspired and try it, to see how it makes my PC pale in comparison to that resolution....
If you tested that configuration on a single monitor and got 20 fps in a game, divide that by three, and you'll roughly have an idea of how it would run. Although I have more graphics power than you, I assume I'd run them at those 20 fps you mentioned......
It's totally unfeasible.......
Best regards...
My tests always gave almost the same results in all tests, a performance loss of 40-50% when going from 1440p to 2160p, and in your case you should be close to my values since you have 3 graphics cards, although I still think these screens will be worth it starting when they achieve 60hz, which will only be in 2014, and in your case, being a lover of surround, you should get one of the curved 4k OLED screens.
Cheers.
-
duplicated …...
-
Hello again,
After testing a bit this morning I can say that it goes up well, and easy. I have been able to increase the core up to +160 without needing to increase the voltage. Then I increased the voltage, and it holds up well with +37mv to +190.
How do you see it? I have not touched the memory yet. And I am considering changing the BIOS. How much do you have it set, pepillo, the one that has an asic equal to mine? -
I have it to play at 1.202 Mhz and the memos at 6.100 Mhz, with the Bios of 1.212v (without changing the bios I had the annoying Throttling), the Power at 130%. To bench it I put it at 1.228 and the memos at 6.200. It does not exceed 77 degrees with a fan profile of 1-1. Saludos -
Wenas de nuevo,
Despues de probar un poco esta mañana puedo decir que sube bien, y facil. He podido subirle el core hasta +160 sin necesidad de subirle voltaje. Luego le he subido voltaje, y me aguanta con +37mv a +190 bien.
Como lo veis? Aun no he tocado memorias. Y me estoy planteando cambiar BIOS. A cuanto la tienes pepillo la que tiene un asic igual al mio?Pinta bien, por lo general todas hacen los 1200, mas o menos…... Cambiar la bios hazlo solo si el baile de frecuencias te és molesto, o necesitas tocar mas los valores del venti. Eso sí la tarjeta cambia de la noche al día sin el Throttling, y piensa que se pondrá en los 300W, mas o menos de consumo.....al deslimitar el power target..... Y eso hay que disiparlo, o sea que a lo mejor tienes que aplicar un perfil de ventilador mas agresivo y pueda ser molesto.....
Un Saludo...
-
Well... another little while "tinkering with it."
Fresh news and more or less my conclusions. First the 3dmark to see what you think:
Well, a while ago I went back to the ORIGINAL BIOS to try a few things.
I realized that, while it does Throttling, it has much more intermediate voltage values - which I like -.
I have set a max voltage of 1.175v@1163 - memos without touching -. Fan profile of AB - the one that unlocks you, which I think is 1:1. Power Limit: 106% - it has never reached 104-105 max..-
Well, as I say; although it does not reach 104-105 it does a small throttling that comes due to the fact that the graphics card decreases the voltage a little and that, I have the feeling that it is a matter of drivers / applications… let's see if I can explain:
That by monitoring on the G13 screen it may stay at 1163 for a good while, with more load and temps, that at a certain moment it goes down a little....
I think this card is like that and that "that's also part of its charm"... let's see if I can explain it too:
In this way that I tell you, during the whole 3dmark most of the time it has been at 1163... going down (voltage and frequencies) at times, very small, between 1120 - 1163... I think this is not noticeable at all and in return we have "more dynamic voltage, which I think the other bios do not do...", kind of like the speedstep of the micros with the offset.
@jordichq --> ¿Marca? ¿Asic?...
I think that suits me, because I like to have less voltage and the graphics card "by itself" is already a beast... let's see if you can try (whoever wants these things)...
Regards
-
Hello,
I am considering getting a pair of Titanes. Can you recommend a reference model????
Best regards.
-
Hello,
I'm looking into getting some Titans. Can you recommend any specific models????
Best regards.
Another "pal´club"…..........
Any Ruruloko model, honestly, I'm guided by extras, warranty, or just the one that gives you the best vibe. The ideal thing would be to choose by Asic, but that's a lottery, and it's not within the reach of the common mortal........
I have 2 Gigabyte, one has over 80% and the other 69, and an Evga SC with 70 and something. If I had to choose one right now, I would go for the cheapest one I could find....
Best regards, and you know we want pictures. ;)......!!
-
Another "pal´club"…..........
Any Ruruloko model, honestly guide me by extras, warranty, or simply the one that gives you the best vibe. The ideal thing would be to be able to choose by Asic, but that's a lottery, and it's not within the reach of the common mortal........
I have 2 Gigabyte, one has more than 80% and the other 69, and an Evga SC with 70 and something. If I had to choose one right now, I would go for the cheapest one I could find....
Best regards, and you know we want images. ;)......!!
Another one lol, yes, you know what goes through our heads :wall: I couldn't resist. I wanted to leave the 670 but for now I'm going to order one to try it out and another next month.
I was saying this in case any model you've seen around the forum had a better asic, but you've convinced me to go for a slightly more economical range.
Once I have it and try them out, I'll look at blocks ;D and I'll upload some pictures.
Best regards.
-
Buenas,
I'm looking into getting some Titans. Can you recommend a reference model????
Best regards.
Wait a bit to see if the 780s come out, maybe the Titan will drop a bit, besides, maybe the 780s are worth more because for the price of two Titans, you could maybe put in three 780s, if you already see pictures it's because it won't be long before they come out.
regards
-
Wait a bit to see if the 780s come out, maybe the Titan will drop a bit, besides, maybe the 780s are worth more because for the price of two Titans, you could get three 780s, if you already see pictures, it's because it won't be long before they come out.
regards
Hello, I understand your comment fjavi, but I'm very stubborn and it's already ordered and will arrive tomorrow... the truth is that there are many rumors that the 780 will be similar in the bus of the Titan and that it is still unknown where the cut in the chips will be.
regards, buddy.
-
ELp3 arrived late, but fantastic work.
By the way, have the boost 2.0 problems been solved already?
-
ELp3 arrived late, but fantastic work.
By the way, have the problems of boost 2.0 been solved already?
Well, I can't confirm it firsthand, since I have the modified bios, but according to comments from colleagues, with the latest beta drivers, the Throttling (oscillations in the frequency of the card), produced by the boost, and its limits in temp, consumption, etc.. it seems to be getting solved.
Salu2…
-
It's that more and more, I see this graphic as an alternative to hold out for a season without changing the VGA :ugly:
-
Good news, I already have them here XD…..... In the end, I got a Gigabyte and an EVGA superoverclok. The Gigabyte has an ASIC of 69% and the EVGA 69.3%. They are not the best ASICs but with the modified bios they reach 1200....
With ELP3's permission, I leave you some images of the titans.
I have done some benchmarks, only with one graphics card and it was the Gigabyte. I just messed up the EVGA to flash it, and I won't have time to keep messing around until tonight.
For now, I want to continue with the comparison of the 670 and Titans. You can't see how hot the bitches get….. I can't see them so hot and on Thursday the blocks will arrive.....
What do you think of these blocks???
Aquacomputer kryographics for GTX TITAN
A small assembly video, where we can see that we didn't use thermal pad for the memories. They come into direct contact with the block and thermal paste like the one we use for the gpu.
Best regards.
-
Well, first congratulations… and now (just like I've posted in other forums) let's see if we can share information; I'm intrigued by the ASIC topic, Throttling, etc., etc... well I'm writing to you -the long way-.
I'm very interested in this topic, as I'm researching everything I can about stock BIOS and stock voltage. I'm also with you Thor, I've spent a lot of money on the graphics cards and; for now I prefer to have them with stock BIOS and stock voltage... I think we still have to research more about this matter.
So, from here I propose that we share information about this that I'm saying and how you test stability, throttling, etc., etc… I continue below:
That is, to see how much the TITANs can stably go up and issues of Throttling and other things (and try to connect it, or draw conclusions regarding the ASIC -which we may not be able to-).
The Gigabyte they left me had an ASIC of 76.5% -a bit above the average, since I think most are around 70- although it went up more… it also did more Throttling also... I've also read cases of very high ASICs and very little OC...
As I say with mine, and I'm talking only about modifying the core values, +106% TDP, fan... but without putting more voltage... the one with the highest ASIC, obviously, presents me with +27Mhz more Boost... however, it does minimal, minimal Throttling... -with 3dmark and Unigine no, but yesterday with the metro yes-. However, the other one, which only has an ASIC of 61% doesn't do any Throttling at all, and seems a bit cooler (although this may be due to the position of the SLI).
Right now the one with the worst ASIC is at 1071Mhz stable (according to the little I've tested, I want to play FC3 which they say is the OC breaker with these cards..., the other 1097, but it drops occasionally to 1077).
Greetings!!!.
