It seems incredible that they continue with the same broken record, Fassou, instead of calling people who try to counter such poor reasoning, with this program, labeling them as anti-AMD, one should wonder if you are the anti-nvidia.
Because honestly, the argument is childish, or you don't know how enormously outdated it already is and the explanations that were given about what was happening with that quick test created by a user, or you do it on purpose.
I'm going to think it's the former, that you are very uninformed about this case, but coming with the same broken record of the 3.5 GB of VRAM with the GTX 970, it's getting tiring. I'm tired of seeing how the last 512 MB of VRAM is used on this card without any problems in performance, to see the latest re-release of the latest Jordie Dan album, computer version.
I'll answer you by allusions.
It's one thing for that program, which I neither know nor use, not to be the appropriate way to demonstrate performance problems in the memory of a graphics card, and quite another to deny that nVIDIA lied about the specifications of their GTX970 graphics card, until it was found that they were being sued for it.
The first meme talks about problems. And if they lied about the product's characteristics, there are undoubtedly problems, and the second is the last image from a promotional video by AMD itself, "encouraging" owners of GTX970 graphics cards who had just received confirmation from several assemblers and distributors that they could return them, to do so in order to buy a Radeon R290X.
Obviously you are free to think whatever you want, which includes thinking if I like nVIDIA, AMD, Intel, Hacendado, or whatever company you think of more.
Salu2!