GTX 780ti or GTX Titan
-
Hello if you had to choose one or some for sli, as of today, what would be your choice? To play.
My team is a 2500k with overclock over 4.8/5 ghz and my resolution 1080p, and I have a gtx 680, with the possibility of increasing the resolution with another monitor obviously, although at 1080 I don't mind and could stay with those pixels.
Greetings and thanks.
PD: There would be the possibility of installing rl for the graphics to get the most out of it if it were "profitable (in terms of gain of oc/ fps)".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Hello fellow:
In terms of price-performance, the 780 GTX is the best. The Titan is worth a lot for the performance it has. I'm only talking about games. If you use the computer for other types of calculation, and you make a more professional use, the Titan can be your graphics card. If it's only for gaming, the 780 GTX.
AMD also has good graphics cards like the 290X. It all depends on the budget and needs, but for a single monitor, with a less powerful graphics card in most cases you will be more than enough. And sometimes, by mounting two graphics cards that are a little less powerful than the ones you say, you will achieve better results, for less money, but that already depends on the game and how optimized it is to use two graphics cards or more.
Check out the website I gave you and play with the graphics options.
Best regards.
-
There aren't many VRAM-hungry games, but there are already some that eat up 3 gigabytes if you give them the chance, and the trend is upward, as always. It's also true that by adjusting some options you can reduce excessive consumption, but well, if you're considering 1600p, a 290X or an SLI of 770 4GB wouldn't be a bad idea if you have a 2nd PCIe x8. It would be better to have PCIe 3.0, but well, you won't lose much, at least not enough to consider a platform jump. In my opinion, we should make the platform jump when we have a mainstream x6 (less than 500€ micro and less than 200 motherboard), even if it's without virtual cores.On the one hand, 4GB in the 780 Ti would be appreciated for whatever may come, on the other hand, 1440p doesn't seem like much of a jump if you have a decent 1080p monitor and 1600p, where you can just move the fair games, see The Witcher 3, which you won't move to 60FPS with a 780 Ti I think.
I would even stretch to a Ti if there's money, but not to a Titan, if at all for 3D Vision with an SLI. What I would do is stretch the 1080p monitor and rack up miles with a 780 Ti.
PD: What kind of beating did you give the micro? What kind of dissipation do you spend and how are the temperatures?
Best regards.
-
Thanks for replying, comrades. Looking at elp3's experience, the "old" titan seems like a better alternative, even better than the 780ti jaja.
I have a corsair h100, and with good ambient temperature, more than 25 degrees easily, the hottest core I have is at 65 degrees at 4.8 ghz, after an hour of bf4 multiplayer.
Let's see if I have more opinions and I'll decide.
Greetings and thanks for collaborating.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I would wait for the 800 series this summer, they have already released the GTs in that range, so it won't be long before the GTXs are released
-
Thanks for replying, colleagues. Looking at elp3's experience, the "old" Titan seems like a better alternative, even better than the 780ti jaja.
I have a corsair h100, and with good ambient temperature, more than 25 degrees easily, the hottest core I have is at 65 degrees at 4.8 ghz, after an hour of bf4 multi player.
Let's see if I have more opinions and I'll decide.
Regards and thanks for collaborating.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The easiest thing is that if ELP3 had the option of 780Ti and Titan would have stayed with the Ti, same with Jotole, they bought the Titan when it was the only one and it was much more powerful than what was on the market.
With the current options it's easier that they would have chosen another one, then if the old Titan allows you to do the trick of raising the voltage quite a lot, but you will need very good cooling, you won't be able to put in so much voltage if you don't have a good RL.
The thing about vram, there are games that have memory losses, that's why 6Gb doesn't guarantee that it will run well, example Watch Dogs, Hitman, MOH if you put the patch with supersampling.
Anyway if you want Vram you already have cards like these.
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 SuperClocked ACX 6GB GDDR5 06G-P4-3787-KR Graphics Card
That EVGA is very likely to support the zawarudo thing and allow you to put in voltage just like the Titans, although now the most advisable thing is to spend little and wait to see what comes out new in the 800 series, there's a Fake on the internet of a possible GM210 which is a lie because if they release something it would be a GM204, it's impossible that it's Maxwell and they say 375W TDP, but that's not something I don't think it will take long to see the new one for real and then compare.Regards
-
Thanks for replying fjavi. I have read several times that elp3 prefers the old titans over the 780ti and the titan black.
The 780ti have improved and now show their full potential with the current drivers or is it still like before where there was barely any difference at equal clocks with the old titans?
Regards and thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Thanks for replying fjavi. I have read on several occasions that elp3 prefers the old titans over the 780ti and the titan black.
The 780ti have improved and now show their full potential with the current drivers or does it still perform like before where there was barely any difference at equal clocks with the old titans?
Regards and thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He prefers them because he already has them, he won't change a Titan for a 780Ti, well in his case there are 4, but when buying if he didn't have any he would surely buy 4 Ti, the savings are important and in the end they will perform similarly.
He plays at 2560x1600, maybe the case of Jotole who has 3 monitors of 2560x1440 maybe 6Gb of memory would be good for him, although right now he could put 4 780s with 6GB for the price of two Titans, a bit more expensive the 4 but they will perform much better.
The Titans are very expensive and when they came out there could be justification because they were the only ones with GK110 but now not anymore, as soon as they release the Ti with 6GB if they don't go too high on the vine the Titans will only be bought by those who think they can take advantage of those DP calculations.The thing with ELP3 is logical with 4 Titans that can increase voltage he won't sell them to buy others that will perform similarly, for that he waits for something to come out where he sees a clear gain in performance.
regards
-
While you stay with 1080p I don't see the need for change, if you had a 1600 monitor I would choose any of the 2 and if you had a 2160p I would go for a graphics card with 4 GB or more I wouldn't settle for something with 3GB.
Although my opinion is that if you don't change the monitor wait for the 20nm GTX 800 I think those graphics cards will be suitable for 4K resolutions.
Regards.-
-
While you stay with 1080p I don't see the need for change, if you had a 1600 monitor I would choose any of the 2 and if you had a 2160p I would go for a graphics card with 4 GB or more I wouldn't settle for something with 3GB.
Although my opinion is that if you don't change the monitor wait for the 20nm GTX 800 I think those graphics cards will be suitable for 4K resolutions.
Regards.-
Well if it were me I would wait with their graphics card until the new ones come out, if they don't convince them with the new ones they will have to start lowering the prices of the previous ones.
Maybe they will put them a little cheaper than the 680 when they come out, after all they will continue to produce the GM204 which will be mid-range, and the same will cost less and should perform somewhat better.
there was a news that said they would be cheaper although until I see it on the street I don't believe it.regards
-
Well, it would be better to hold out with its graphics until the new ones come out, if the new ones don't convince you, you'll have to start downloading the old ones.
Maybe they'll make them a little cheaper than the 680 when they come out, after all, they're going to keep producing the GM204, which will be mid-range, and they might cost less and should perform a little better.
there was a news that said they would be cheaper, but I won't believe it until I see it on the street.regards
If at this point I would wait until October for the GTX 880, which seems to be almost confirmed.-
Regards.-
-
If at this point you would wait until October for the GTX 880 that seems to be almost confirmed already.-
Regards.-
I will repeat the trick, I do not buy a GM204, until they release the high end I want nothing.
Besides if it continues to be 28nm I do not think we will see any miracle in performance.If you buy it should be either in 20nm or in 16nm, which is where you should really see a greater leap in performance.
Regards
-
It's that, that I don't know when the top of the range is going to come out, because it seems to me that what comes out in these months is the "medium" chip.
Greetings.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I will repeat the play, I won't buy a GM204, until they release the high-end I don't want anything.
Besides, if it's still 28nm I don't think we'll see any miracle in performance.If you have to buy it should be either in 20nm or 16nm, which is where you should really see a major performance jump.
Regards
If that's true the one that comes out is the GTX 880 at 28nm I doubt it will be inferior to a Titan or a GTX 780 Ti if you need to buy I think it's not a bad option.
I know I'll wait for the 16/20 nm at least until these GTX 880 cost $350 but we know that's not going to happen.
Regards.-
It's that, that we don't know when the top of the range will come out, because I think what comes out in these months is the "medium" chip.
Regards.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is said that the 16nm come out in Q1 2015 but the GTX 880 will be a good alternative depending on what you currently have, for 1080p it would be more than enough.
I am currently playing at 2160p with a Titan it may falter in some game but I don't feel it's a hindrance.
Regards.-
-
It's that, I don't know when the high-end model will be released, because I think what comes out in these months is the "mid-range" chip.
Regards.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We won't see the high-end model until late next year or early the following year, depending on the competition, but it's very likely they'll do the same as with the GK110.
It's even very possible that the first GM210 will be another Titan, with a crazy price, although later they will launch the GTX 980 and other models.I think the 880 will be close to the 780Ti, not much more, and possibly cheaper, something like the 9800GTX, compared to the 8800GTX, depending on how the GM204 performs, but in 28nm they might make that move.
I don't believe the rumors about semi-accurate, that they'll move to 16nm is not credible because the wait could be long.regards
If that's true, the GTX 880 at 28nm is released, I doubt it will be inferior to a Titan or a GTX 780 Ti if you need to buy, I think it's not a bad option.
I know I'll wait for the 16/20 nm at least that these GTX 880 cost $350 but we know that's not going to happen.
Regards.-
I don't think it will be inferior, but they'll play the card of better consumption, that it's cheaper, which in reality wouldn't be cheaper, they'll be giving mid-range renamed as high-end.
But it's very possible that it will be cheaper, they no longer have an excuse that the process is expensive, and many people know about Kepler, so what they'll do is something similar to what happened with 8800GTX and 9800GTX, or what happened with GF110 and GK104, only this time it might be cheaper than the 680 when it comes out.
They'll tell us they're very good at consumption, they'll highlight their new technology, but performance I don't think it will be exaggerated compared to a 780Ti.The curious thing is that people then fight for NVIDIA or AMD and in recent years it seems like they make a pact to divide the market and not coincide in releases, so there's little competition.
Regards -
I don't think it will be inferior, but they will play the card of better consumption, that it is cheaper, which in reality would not be cheaper is that they will be giving renowned mid-range as high-end.
But it is very possible that it will be cheaper, they no longer have an excuse that the process is expensive, and many people already know about Kepler, that's why what they will do is something similar to what happened with 8800GTX and 9800GTX, or what happened with GF110 and GK104, only that this time perhaps it will be cheaper than the 680 when it comes out.
They will tell us that they are very good in consumption, they will highlight their new technology, but I don't think the performance will be exaggerated compared to a 780Ti.The curious thing is that people then fight for nvidia or AMD and in recent years it seems that they make a pact to divide the market and not coincide in the launches, so there is little competition.
RegardsI suppose they must be at 15-20% above the 780 TI, it will still be an advance, being 3 months I think it is worth waiting more knowing that they would also improve in consumption and perhaps price.
Regards.-
-
I guess they should be at 15-20% over the 780 TI, it will also be an improvement, being 3 months, I think it's worth waiting more knowing that they would also improve in consumption and perhaps price.
Regards.
Depending on how they do it, but up to 30% they could get out, anyway, now there are rumors of a GM200 with 4000SP at 28nm, people don't realize that this is impossible.
If Kepler has 2880SP and Kepler's SP occupy less space, I don't know how they will fit 4000 in 28nm, if it's true that nvidia is preparing a GM200 for mid-2015, also with 512 bits and 4000SP it must be 20nm, in 600mm it doesn't fit that much SP with 28nm.They will be rumors even though they put it as if they are sending it.
http://videocardz.com/51032/nvidia-maxwell-gm200-spotted-new-gtx-titan-ii-core
these from videocardz are already like gossip, it's incredible that news, especially in 28nm in 20nm if it's more possible.regards
-
Depending on how they do it, but up to 30% they could get out, anyway now there are rumors of a GM200 with 4000SP at 28nm, people don't realize that this is impossible.
If Kepler has 2880SP and Kepler's SPs take up less space I don't know how they're going to fit 4000 in 28nm, if it's true that nvidia is preparing a GM200 for mid-2015, also with 512 bits and 4000SP it must be 20nm, in 600mm it doesn't fit that much SP with 28nm.They will be rumors even though they put it as if they are sending it.
http://videocardz.com/51032/nvidia-maxwell-gm200-spotted-new-gtx-titan-ii-core
these from videocardz are already like gossip, it's incredible that news, especially in 28nm in 20nm if it's more possible.regards
If I had read the news, in another source they also publish that the cost of the chip only without pcb would be $ 370 and it would be 50% more than a Titan Black
But we are talking about almost 1 year let's see how it turns out.-
regards.-
-
If you had read the news, another source also published that the cost of the chip alone without pcb would be $ 370 and would be 50% more than a Titan Black
But we are talking about almost 1 year let's wait to see how it turns out.-
Regards.-
But that's a lie, they can't do that in 28nm, it would have to be a bigger chip than the ones Nvidia made and even then perhaps by those dates it could do it in 20nm.
These are the typical rumors that are invented like that of the fermi that would be double that of a 295, they said 200%, it was incredible.
Just like the one that says Nvidia will skip 20nm and wait for 16nm, it is unlikely because if they still can't manufacture in 20nm, waiting for 16nm could take too long.
Unless they reach an agreement with Samsung to manufacture the chips with TSMC I think it's difficult.Regards
-
But that's a lie, they can't do that in 28nm, it would have to be a bigger chip than the ones Nvidia made and even then maybe by that time it could do it in 20nm.
These are the typical rumors that are invented like that of the fermi that would be double that of a 295, they said 200%, it was incredible.
Just like the one that says Nvidia will skip 20nm and wait for 16nm, it's not very believable because if they can't even manufacture in 20nm, waiting for 16nm could take too long.
Unless they reach an agreement with Samsung to manufacture the chips with TSMC, I think it's difficult.Regards
If it's true we just have to wait until November to see what these GTX 870 / 880 in 28nm turn out to be and then in 2015 see how the 20nm pieces move? or how they're supposed to be 14/16 nm with some company competitor of TSMC.-
Regards.-
