NVIDIA CUDA Card
-
Hello everyone, I'm looking to get a card for video editing with premiere and after Fxs. The thing is that a new nvidia with cuda bla bla is a fortune.
As you can see, the option of buying one of these two second-hand ones that used to cost a fortune is appealing to me? (my budget - I don't want it to go up more than 100 euros in the case of second-hand) if it's first-hand and you recommend something good, I'm open.
http://www.segundamano.es/barcelona/tarjeta-grafica-nvidia/a63565583/?ca=8_s&st=a&c=3
http://www.segundamano.es/barcelona/nvidia-9600gtx-xfx/a63239458/?ca=8_s&st=a&c=3
For now, I'm using the integrated graphics of the motherboard but... you can't edit anything well. Renders for hours and hours... Basically to edit videos of GOPROhero3+ Black in 1080 and 2.7k + plugins mojo... colorista... MERCI!
-
Hello, I'm looking to get a card for video editing with Premiere and After Effects. The thing is, a new Nvidia with CUDA is a fortune.
How do you see the option of buying one of these two second-hand ones that used to cost a fortune? (my budget - I don't want it to go up more than 100 euros in the case of second-hand) if it's first-hand and you recommend something good, I'm open.
http://www.segundamano.es/barcelona/tarjeta-grafica-nvidia/a63565583/?ca=8_s&st=a&c=3
http://www.segundamano.es/barcelona/nvidia-9600gtx-xfx/a63239458/?ca=8_s&st=a&c=3
For now, I'm using the integrated graphics of the motherboard but... you can't edit anything well. Renders for hours and hours... Basically to edit GOPROhero3+ Black videos in 1080 and 2.7k + mojo plugins... colorista... MERCI!
Of those two you put, without a doubt the first one, it's not only substantially more powerful than the second one, more modern and with more VRAM, but it's also cheaper.
Both are relatively old (less the first one), they are compatible with somewhat old CUDA versions, but they should work with the effects you need.
A great new card for CUDA in single precision, low budget are the GTX 750 Ti:
You need to go to a GTX 760 or better to a GTX 770 to get an advantage in GPGPU, especially when we talk about applications that use single precision in their calculations, like video editing.
You can look for it second-hand for those 100€ as a limit. Another option is to look for a GTX 580/480 that you should also be able to find for that price. They are somewhat better in some cases of gpgpu, but not as energy efficient or compatible with such modern CUDA versions, besides that the 750Ti show better compatibility with all kinds of OpenCL tasks in case you use a program that doesn't use CUDA, which can also happen (in this case AMDs can be a very good option, although of course, they don't have CUDA support).
-
Considering that only 30% of a gaming GPU is used when editing video, between a 750 and a 740 I go for the 740 because the bandwidth is practically the same and it is much cheaper.
That being said, as of today for editing I would recommend a 660, it's 100€ less than a 760 and the bandwidth is only 50 Gb/s less, and in CUDAs it's only 192 less.And I repeat what I told you in another thread: for video editing 8 GB of RAM is just half of what is needed.
-
Hey! Thanks for the answers, so what do you recommend, do I get the cheap number 1 or do I look for something new like what you were talking about? I already know about the 8 gigabytes, hehe! Little by little!! Thanks! -
Considering that barely 30% of a gaming GPU is used when editing video, between a 750 and a 740 I go for the 740 because the bandwidth is practically the same and it is much cheaper.
That being said, as of today for editing I would recommend a 660, it's 100€ less than a 760 and the bandwidth is only 50 Gb/s less, and in CUDAs it's only 192 less.And I repeat what I told you in another thread: for video editing 8 GB of RAM is just half of what is needed.
The efficiency in gpgpu tasks of a 750 ti has nothing to do with kepler:
In the worst cases with computing it stays halfway to a GTX 770, and in the best it gets very close. A GTX 660 barely surpasses the performance of a GTX 770 by half (about 60%).
If you want performance and efficiency, GTX 750 Ti. We are not talking about games, and bandwidth is irrelevant when you have to access memory much less with Maxwell (much more relaxed caching system). By the way, I don't know why you mention the GT 740 as an "alternative", since it's not even of maxwell architecture but kepler. The thing about 30% use of a gpu for games in video editing seems like it's pulled out of thin air, from a book (why 30%? The same in an entry-level gpu, in a top range, in a medium range?)… :troll:
-
The efficiency in gpgpu tasks of a 750 ti has nothing to do with kepler:
In the worst cases with computing it stays halfway to a GTX 770, and in the best it is very close. A GTX 660 barely surpasses the performance of a GTX 770 by half (about 60%).
If you want performance and efficiency, GTX 750 Ti. We are not talking about games, and bandwidth is irrelevant when you have to access memory much less with Maxwell (much more relaxed caching system). By the way, I don't know why you mention the GT 740 as an "alternative", since it is not even of maxwell architecture but kepler. The thing about 30% gpu usage for gaming in video editing seems like it was pulled out of a hat, from a book (why 30%? The same in an entry-level gpu, in a top range, in a medium range?)… :troll:
Jejeje, before you ask why I'm sending you to India for a visit, this is the correct link:
http://wwwendigo.blogspot.com.es/2014/03/msi-gtx-750-ti-oc-maxwell-en-accion.html
Why the hell is there no comment editing in hardlimit?
-
Ei! merci for the answers, so what do you recommend, do I get the cheap number 1 or do I look at something new like what you were talking about? I already know about the 8 gigabytes hehe! little by little!! merci!
The 260 is much more powerful, I just think the 9600 seems very expensive, the only thing is that the 260 might need a better power supply, but for 35€ that's a good card, I have the same Gigabyte one, before paying that for the 9600 I would look for something more modern second-hand.
regards
-
Why do I recommend the gtx 660 or the 740?
Because according to what I have read the budget is around €100. Edit: For the price range, the 660 seems more suitable to me than a 770.Where did I get that a GPU doesn't reach 30% during video editing from?
By looking at the monitoring while you preview a render in premiere pro. -
So what do we decide? Do I take the one that isn't 9600 or do I look at a more modern one?
-
New and brand new:
Gigabyte GeForce GT 740 OC 2GB GDDR5: ≈ 105€
MSI GeForce GTX 750 OC 2GB GDDR5: ≈ 110€Asus GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB GDDR5: ≈ 155€
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 OC 3GB GDDR5: ≈ 180€Gigabyte GeForce GTX 760 OC 2GB GDDR5: ≈ 220€
Gigabyte GeForce GTX970 OC 4GB GDDR5: ≈ 348€Edit: Don't worry if the one you choose is not supported by Adobe, just edit the "cuda suported cards" file and enter the model you have.
Edit: Ah, by the way wwwendigo, very interesting document. Congratulations.;D
-
¿Que porqué recomiendo la gtx 660 o la 740?
Porque según he leído el presupuesto es de alrededor de 100 €. Edito: Por el rango de precio, la 660 me ha parecido más adecuada que una 770.¿Que de donde me he sacado que una GPU no llega al 30 % durante una edición de video?
Mirando la monitorización mientras haces el preview de un render en premiere pro.Hombre, pues precisamente por eso te lo digo, porque no es lo mismo la carga que veas en un caso concreto, que la que veas en otro modelo con más o menos cuda cores, o lo que tercie. En unas llegarán al 100% porque usarán muchos recursos de los disponibles, y en otras no, ya sean porque son gama alta, baja o…. trabajan mejor con el código CUDA a ejecutar. Por ejemplo cuando se miran arquitecturas distintas.
No olvides que maxwell es más eficiente en el uso de su hardware, es un gran lifting de kepler, por decirlo resumido (y mejora en puntos críticos), una GTX 750 o 750 ti nada tienen que ver con una 740, de hecho estoy seguro de que en la mayoría de casos le irán contra una GTX 660 igual o incluso mejor.
Fuera de esto, los precios más o menos de acuerdo, pero se pueden conseguir las 750 Ti a partir de 130€, aunque supongo que con una 750 básica se trabajará muy parecido con este programa, y es un poco más barata.
Estando a punto de salir la GTX 960, yo descartaría de momento las GTX 660/760, y la 770, simplemente por su precio está muy alejado de la pregunta original, puestos a gastar esa pasta, mucho mejor en la GTX 970 por un poco más, porque en gpgpu es bastante mejor.
Ah, y gracias por la fecilitación, aunque no sé si es por tan interesante página sobre platos indios "callejeros" o por mi test de rendimiento gpgpu de la 750 ti. :troll:
-
Hey! I've been offered this card for 50 euros, the Asus Nvidia 550 TI gddr5 memory, nvidia
physx, nvidia cuda
technology hdmi 1. 4, prepared for 3d, cuda cores 192 graphics clock (mhz) 900 processor clock (mhz) 1800 Right now I can't pay more than 100 euros and these are 50 and it doesn't look bad because of the CUDA thing and all that, I think I mentioned that I edit gopro videos of 1080 and I also reduce the 2.7 to 1080+semi-professional plugins like mojo, colorista… bla bla bla! Merci!
