Pc for calculations

[radge]

Hello, I have made another configuration, I have removed some RAM and improved the font and I think the micro.
Let me know what you think?

[Espinetenbolas]

The 6700K's floating-point unit is more powerful at the same clock speed than the 4790K... but the 4790K has more MHz... in the end you end up the same unless you have specific applications or use of instructions.

Also, the speed of the RAM plays its role.

That's why the program you use is important because if it takes advantage of multi-core, a 5820K is much better.

Although of course, the motherboard is also more expensive and you need to buy a dedicated graphics card for this platform.

[radge]

@Espinetenbolas:

The 6700K's floating-point unit is more powerful at the same clock speed than the 4790K... but the 4790K has more Mhz... in the end you end up the same unless you have specific applications or use of instructions.

Also, the speed of the RAM plays its part.

That's why the program you use is important because if it takes advantage of multi-core, a 5820K is much better.

Although of course, the motherboard is also more expensive and you need to buy a dedicated graphics card for this platform.

I'm almost more interested in it having the integrated graphics since putting an external one is a device in my case "useless" in addition to 20 or 30€ of expense.

No?

Thanks

[cobito]

@radge:

I'm almost more interested in it having the graphics integrated as adding an external one is a "useless" device in my case, not to mention the 20 or 30€ expense.

No?

Thanks

It depends on the program. A powerful GPU can do a great job with parallelizable calculations.

[defaultuser]

@cobito:

It depends on the program. A powerful GPU can do a great job in parallelizable calculations.

The program must be secret :troll:, and that is the most determining factor.

@radge:

I'm almost more interested in it having integrated graphics since adding an external one is a device that is "useless" in my case, in addition to spending 20 or 30€.

Not?

Thanks

Well, you never know, it could be a multithreaded program that can take advantage of the graphics, and that would multiply the capacity.
But that depends on each program, just as the graphics could be a superfluous expense, or it could increase your performance per euro a lot, the program is the fundamental thing in this case.

Salu2.

[radge]

@defaultuser:

The program must be secret :troll:, and that is the most determining thing.

Well, who knows, it could be a multi-threaded program that can take advantage of the graphics, and that would multiply the capacity.
But that depends on each program, just as the graphics could be a superfluous expense, or it could increase the performance per euro a lot, the program is the fundamental thing in this case.

Salu2.

Hello, I think I explained it above.
The program is made by me, written in Visual Studio with multi-thread and what it does is data combination, something similar to the pools…but for another sector

[defaultuser]

Ok, Well, it seems like I didn't see it.
Apparently c++ can use CUDA, I would seriously consider it.
Well, you could add the graphics later if you see that you can take advantage of it, it's not urgent, but it could be several times faster if that's the case.

Regards.

[Espinetenbolas]

So then a GPU with CUDA is 50 times better than getting a 6700K

http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/116711/SC11-NV-TESLA.pdf

Learn Parallel Programming | Developing with GPUs | NVIDIA

[cobito]

I second what Espinete says. For high-frequency trading I have read that Tesla gives good results.

[radge]

@defaultuser:

Ok, Pues se ve que no lo vi.
Por lo visto c++ si puede usar CUDA, yo me lo miraria muy seriamente.
Bueno la grafica podrias añadirla mas tarde si ves que la puedes aprovechar tampoco es urgente, pero te podria ir varias veces mas rapido si fuera el caso.

Salu2.

Si si conozco CUDA pero no es viable ja que este programa depende de un SDK de un tercero y no puede funcionar con CUDA por el momento.

Gracias