HardLimit on hwbot.org

[jordiqui]

@jordiqui I am answering myself and to see if anyone has experienced the same thing with Xeon processors. I spent a good time trying to get the graphics card to fit and close the case lid, but because of the heatsink, it is impossible. That doesn't matter. The issue is that when I want to validate the results, unlike the laptop that does accept the intel software to add the hardware with a file, in this old computer it doesn't. And it doesn't recognize the xeons, except as Pentium II, III etc.. I was going to run the Vantage which the laptop is doing with a little oc on the rtx 3060,. because when I saw that it was more than an hour, I gave up in case it wouldn't let me validate the result later. In cinebench it came in third, because cinebench itself in r15 I think, let me upload a screenshot, but in the others there was no way. In any case, we are going to add points to the team. A big hug.

[jordiqui]

Hello colleagues, although I imagine that we are all busy and can't do what we did 10 or 15 years ago, at least I, spending a lot of money to do this that I like so much, I can assure you that I am having a great time at this place. The problem, as I have mentioned, is that on the one hand, by not letting me install the intel app to upgrade the hardware auto, in manual mode these xeons are not recognized. Then of course many apps cost a lot of money and you can't or I think you shouldn't add results with pirated apps. I imagine that you end up being banned and it gives a bad image. But with the bench that I can do because they are free, I enjoy like a kid. Nothing, I keep adding points and enjoying.. PD: you are going to kill me, but now I regret not having bought a tower with the intel core i9 because I will get tired of chess, but not of this. But well, it is what we have and hey for 340 euros this server is the best.

[krampak]

I have a couple of notifications of unapproved results from @jordiqui. It seems like you are missing cpuz screenshots.

These are the 2:

http://hwbot.org/submission/4943961_desvelemosafrica_3dmark05_geforce_gt_730_(gf108)_20828_marks

http://hwbot.org/submission/4944146_desvelemosafrica_superpi___1m_core_i7_11800h_7sec_296ms

[jordiqui]

@krampak said in HardLimit on hwbot.org:

I have a couple of notifications of unapproved results @jordiqui It seems that you are missing cpuz screenshots.

These are the 2:

http://hwbot.org/submission/4943961_desvelemosafrica_3dmark05_geforce_gt_730_(gf108)_20828_marks

http://hwbot.org/submission/4944146_desvelemosafrica_superpi___1m_core_i7_11800h_7sec_296ms

Corrected the super pi and by the way I did the 32mb one. :- thanks for letting me know

[jordiqui]

Hello mates, I can't register this test because the app that provides the file doesn't detect the motherboard model. And in this particular test it doesn't allow you to do it manually. And the result with the turbo activated at 3.6 Ghz gives a good result that would give us points. I have already sent a message to the app's authors, with the screenshot explaining the bug that the app reports.

[jordiqui]

After messing around with the server's pci adapter, I moved the array controller card. In short, it didn't recognize the logical drives. I spent hours trying until I opened the server and by chance I saw one of the leds flashing and I saw that it wasn't properly anchored. And that's for the measly points that the Gt730 gives. But in novice we are in first place.

[defaultuser]

@jordiqui ILO is in the house jjj

You could have put more photos of the board, I had never seen a sword like this open before.

[jordiqui]

@defaultuser Eso está hecho.

[jordiqui]

@jordiqui

[jordiqui]

@defaultuser said in HardLimit on hwbot.org:

@jordiqui ILO is in the house jjj

You could have already put more photos of the board, I had never seen a sword like this open before.

[jordiqui]

I'm looking at this now after doing my research—and I wouldn't have bought it without doing so—and I'm furious at what a well-known online store did. Even though I provided all the details—model, rack size, etc.—they sent me something that was only good for placing those two servers on top of, not for mounting them in a rack... etc...

[krampak]

@jordiqui It's strange because those rackmount servers are standard (only varying depending on whether they are 1U or 2U) and are always mounted in 19-inch wide racks. What can actually vary is the depth and rails, depending on whether they are LFF or SFF. I don't know exactly what they sold you.

[jordiqui]

@krampak said:

@jordiqui It's strange because those rackmount servers are standard (they only differ by whether they're 1U or 2U) and they always mount in 19-inch wide racks. What can actually vary is the depth and the rails, depending on whether they're LFF or SFF. I don't know exactly what they sold you.

And you're right, @krampak, they acknowledged the mistake, but at the time I insisted on trying to get it to work and, well, I couldn't return it anymore. But yes, they did send me the email with the corresponding compatible cabinet, because as you rightly say, they are 1U or 2U. But that's in the past, and this image reminded me of it the other day. Now, I got rid of two of them and kept the one that was in better condition. Warm regards, my dear friend.