The cloud thing is very beautiful...

kynes

I can tell you that I have reduced the monthly invoice by around 60% I think I have told you everything :facepalm:
Although I know that I won't get much out of it, at least I will have the satisfaction of a job well done :wall:

300 gigabytes a day since 2009 comes to about 400 terabytes? That on Amazon must cost about 50,000€ per month?

Count count…

packosoft

@kynes:

300 gigas al día desde 2009 sale a unos 400 teras? Eso en Amazon debe costar unos 50000€ al mes?

Cuenta cuenta…

Ya me haces dudar y ahora no tengo el dato delante, pero eran poco mas de 1000 snapshots y si no recuerdo mal sale como a 0.10€/GB, asi que te sobra un cero

kynes

@packosoft:

You're making me doubt and now I don't have the data in front of me, but it was just over 1000 snapshots and if I remember correctly it comes out to about 0.10€/GB, so you're missing a zero

30010000,10 comes out to 30000€ a month. Either I'm missing a couple of coffees, or my calculations are wrong.

Franziskaner

I am beginning to understand the subtle difference between Macroeconomics and micro/my economy
Best regards

packosoft

@kynes:

30010000,10 gives me €30,000 a month. Either I need a couple more coffees, or my math is wrong.

okay, I understand now. Like the previous owner of the service, for 9 months he hadn't paid Amazon, so in order not to (overly) inflate an invoice that they wouldn't collect otherwise, they only billed the first 16TB, the rest went to Amazon's 'cold-storage' (Glacier) where you pay $0.01/GB in exchange for having access under request and not under demand, plus they didn't even bill it
@Franziskaner:

I'm starting to understand the subtle difference between Macroeconomics and micro/my economy
Regards

well, I'm sorry to tell you that this is still microeconomics xDD. The day they fire me, I'll tell you about some good movies xDD

Tecnho

I think macroeconomics starts from 10 zeros XD, let's hope they don't kick you out, Packo, but you can count the movies XD

Franziskaner

@packosoft:

ok, I understand now. As the previous owner of the service hadn't paid Amazon for 9 months, in order not to (over)inflate an invoice that they wouldn't collect, they only billed the first 16TB, the rest went to Amazon's 'cold-storage' (Glacier) where you pay $0.01/GB in exchange for having access on request and not on demand, and they didn't even bill it

well, I'm sorry to tell you that this is still microeconomics xDD. The day they fire me, I'll tell you about a good movie xDD

for people who seem, as is the case, to "not care about paying" until you've solved it from 30,000 to 50,000 euros, for me that's macroeconomics, another thing entirely is what they pay you :eoh:
greetings

packosoft

for example a button
September invoice

October invoice (here I already touched it at the end of the month)

November invoice to this day

cobito

The company you work for must already be a mess for no one to have questioned the reason for that overspending.

packosoft

@cobito:

The company you work for must be pretty messed up for no one to have questioned the reason for that overspending.

You know what's funny? These invoices are for a web service from a startup that we've 'bought' that coincidentally has been in bankruptcy proceedings for the past 9 months. Of course, if they've done everything the same way, I'm not surprised at all by the financial situation…

Namiga