Test of the Real Nvidia Gtx Titan, single-sli-tri Sli, 4 WAY SLI
-
¿Pero qué problema es ése de las cuerdas? Que yo lo he jugado y no me doy cuenta de a qué te refieres, la curiosidad me corroe.:ffu:
MaLDoHD for Crysis 2: Performance bug in Crysis 3 first level
-
Hello:
I already mentioned that nVidia was working on a second "cut" Titan in terms of performance and we will have it soon (it is estimated for the summer).
NVIDIA is reportedly working on a second GK110, a cut-down GTX Titan.
To do this, they plan to launch a new GeForce, still with an unknown name, based on the GK110 chip, which would arrive next summer and would be a more economical and less powerful version than the current GTX Titan. The future card would have 13 SMX instead of the 14 of the GTX Titan (and the 15 of the GK110 chip), a 320-bit bus instead of the 384 with 5 GB of VRAM. In addition, it would have 2,496 Stream Processors instead of 2,688, 208 texture units vs. 224 and 40 of the 48 ROPs of its big sister.
Obviously, NVIDIA has a lot of room to set the price, since there is a big gap between the GTX 680 and the GTX Titan. In terms of performance, it is also clear that it will be between both cards with a figure that, from Noticias3D, we would bet on a 25-30% superiority over the GTX 680, also being superior to the HD 7970 GHz Edition, but we don't dare to put figures there.
The specifications of the GTX Titan were practically identical to those of the Tesla K20X, while those of this new future VGA are very similar to the Tesla K20 and it wouldn't surprise us if it were identical except for the clock speed of the core.
Source: Noticias3D - NVIDIA is reportedly working on a second GK110, a cut-down GTX Titan
Will it be time to go for this one if the restrictions are NOT too exaggerated …..........?
Best regards.
-
By the way, I just checked something very strange. The benchmark score of Batman and Mafia II seemed a bit low to me. I tried the 3dMark Vantage, and the physics don't work for me, it does them by CPU regardless of what I select in the nVidia control panel. Does anyone else have this problem?
Thanks
-
By the way, I just checked something very strange. The benchmark score of Batman and Mafia II seemed a bit low to me. I tried the 3dMark Vantage, and the physics don't work for me, it does them by CPU regardless of what I select in the nVidia control panel. Does anyone else have this issue?
Thanks
For me, the physics work in MAFIA 2, benchmark by the way, which improves a lot with the TITANs. Although it is true that in this case I had an exclusive for physics.
I think it's a matter of drivers. For whatever reason, it's possible that the PhysX one hasn't been installed properly. Reinstall or install them individually.
Best regards.
-
Could you try the physics test in Vantage?
The drivers I just installed today are also the latest beta, and it gives me the same error.
Thanks
-
Could you try the physics test of the Vantage?
The drivers I just installed today are also the latest beta, and it gives me the same error.
Thanks
I have the same issue with the GTX660, it does the physics through the CPU…
-
It happens to me with the GTX660, the physics are done by CPU…
If it happens to more people, I feel more at ease, it will be a matter of drivers, I worry that you search on Google and I found nothing.
Greetings
-
That happens to me with the GTX660, the physics are done by CPU…
Did you end up changing Oli?
Best regards.
-
Did you finally change Oli?
Best regards.
More or less, I was able to buy a GTX660 at a good price and I bought it mainly to tinker with it a bit, but I won't keep it, I'll change it soon ;), it's the 2Gb one and in Skyrim I run out of vram with just 4 mods, because from 1.5Gb you know what happens.
Best regards
-
That happens to me with the GTX660, the physics is done by CPU…
The physics works for me, I just played Alice Madnes and it's noticeable a lot and that's not done by CPU because it would get stuck, assign it manually to the GPU, I play Alice Madnes with the 470 with high physx and it's noticeable a lot, I made an underwater area that has a lot of physx and a lot of Ápex and the GPU does it, you can see the indicator by putting it in the driver to see if physx works, it's like the SLI bar but for PhysX, if it works it shows up and if not, it doesn't.
Jotole those Titans look great on your rig, it doesn't seem like they need the RL.
saludos
-
The physics work for me, I just played Alice Madnes and it's noticeable a lot and that's not the CPU doing it because it would get stuck, assign it manually to the GPU, I play Alice Madnes with the 470 with high physx and it's noticeable quite a bit, I made an underwater area that has a lot of physx and a lot of Ápex and the GPU does it, you can see the indicator by putting it in the driver to see if physx works it's like the SLI bar but for PhysX, if it works it shows up and if not then it doesn't show up.
Jotole those Titans look great in your rig, doesn't seem like they need the RL.
saludos
It's not that the physics don't work, we're just talking about the vantage physics test, not the games that use Physx ;).
-
Indeed, I just activated the Physx indicator in the drivers, and with Batman or Mafia it runs through the GPU, while in Vantage it shows CPU. It bothers me because I save my scores from these tests every time I change graphics to compare …..... I need to find a solution.
Regards
-
More or less, I was able to buy a GTX660 at a good price and I bought it mainly to tinker with it a bit, but I won't keep it, I'll change it soon ;), it's the 2Gb one and in Skyrim I run out of vram with just 4 mods, because from 1.5Gb you know what happens.
Best regards
Ya..bueno, it's just that the graphics card and the 2Gb is a bit of a joke..but anyway..apart from that, have you liked it?
Best regards.
-
Indeed, I just activated the Physx indicator in the drivers, and with Batman or Mafia it runs on the GPU, while in Vantage it shows CPU. It bothers me because I save my scores from these tests every time I change graphics to compare …..... it's time to look for a solution.
Regards
Sometimes I'm not dumber because I don't train:
:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall:
Well, fixed ;D And yes, one Titan performs better in physics than two GTX580 in SLI …....
-
With permission :troll:
Compared to the GTX 460
I bought them on Amazon. Everything is correct.
They run better than I thought on an X58 board with an i7 950 at 4.2GHz :fuckyea:
-
Con permiso :troll:
Comparada con la GTX 460
Las he pillado en Amazon. Todo correcto.
Va mejor de lo que pensaba en una placa X58 con un i7 950 a 4.2GHz :fuckyea:
Vaya..las primeras ASUS..a ver como salen..
La verdad,es que si has pasado de un GTX 460 a "eso"..la diferencia vá a ser mas que monstruosa..;)
Salu2.
-
Vaya..las primeras ASUS..a ver como salen..
La verdad,es que si has pasado de un GTX 460 a "eso"..la diferencia vá a ser mas que monstruosa..;)
Salu2.
Vengo de un SLI de GTX 460. Las graficas se comportan muy similares; en stock, una la tengo a 0.875 V y la otra a 0.887 V. En el maximo de rendimiento a 106% y 95º ambas se estabilizan en 1.150 V.
Tenia intencion de actuaizarles las BIOS pero para jugar, que es para lo que las he comprado, el throttling apenas molesta (en stock a 100% 80º es mas evidente). Tras varias pasadas en loop del Unigine Valley a 1920x1080 8xAA (preset Extreme HD) se ponen en 88º.
Si me dan problemas lo comentare.
-
It's hard to know about the Patagonico, like that with the specs... it looks like the "Mini Titan", which was rumored. If it comes out, it's possible that the series 7 will be delayed until the end of the year, so that they come out together with the ATI.
I think 5 GB is very interesting if its price is around $600, it could be a very good graphics card and not so far from the Titan and if the series 7 and onwards only have 3GB and at a price lower than $400, otherwise it wouldn't make sense.-
Regards.-
-
Sometimes I'm not more stupid because I don't train:
:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall:
Bueno, arreglado ;D Y sí, it yields more in physics a single Titan than two GTX580 in SLI....
Claro al final todo tiene lógica,esa Titan debe ser potente con physX, ya las 4x0 y 5x0 sobretodo gama
alta se defendian muy bien y la 6x0 son aun mas potentes, por eso la Titan debe ser la mejor sin duda.
It's not that physics don't work, we're just talking about the physics test of vantage, not the games that use Physx ;).
pues mira a ver si has metido configuración personalizada a Vantage,por que si funciona en juegos igual debe funcionar en Vantage,a ver si lo tienes como lo muestra Pepillo.
Saludos
-
I come from an SLI of GTX 460. The graphics behave very similarly; in stock, I have one at 0.875 V and the other at 0.887 V. At maximum performance at 106% and 95º both stabilize at 1.150 V.
I intended to update their BIOS but for gaming, which is what I bought them for, the throttling hardly bothers (in stock at 100% 80º it is more evident). After several passes in the Unigine Valley loop at 1920x1080 8xAA (Extreme HD preset) they get to 88º.
If they give me problems I will comment.
By the way, in case anyone is interested, the 750W power supply (a Corsair TX750 V1) that I had before has not given me any problems with the TITAN so far.
