Test of the Real Nvidia Gtx Titan, single-sli-tri Sli, 4 WAY SLI
-
With permission :troll:
Compared to the GTX 460
I bought them on Amazon. Everything is correct.
They run better than I thought on an X58 board with an i7 950 at 4.2GHz :fuckyea:
-
Con permiso :troll:
Comparada con la GTX 460
Las he pillado en Amazon. Todo correcto.
Va mejor de lo que pensaba en una placa X58 con un i7 950 a 4.2GHz :fuckyea:
Vaya..las primeras ASUS..a ver como salen..
La verdad,es que si has pasado de un GTX 460 a "eso"..la diferencia vá a ser mas que monstruosa..;)
Salu2.
-
Vaya..las primeras ASUS..a ver como salen..
La verdad,es que si has pasado de un GTX 460 a "eso"..la diferencia vá a ser mas que monstruosa..;)
Salu2.
Vengo de un SLI de GTX 460. Las graficas se comportan muy similares; en stock, una la tengo a 0.875 V y la otra a 0.887 V. En el maximo de rendimiento a 106% y 95º ambas se estabilizan en 1.150 V.
Tenia intencion de actuaizarles las BIOS pero para jugar, que es para lo que las he comprado, el throttling apenas molesta (en stock a 100% 80º es mas evidente). Tras varias pasadas en loop del Unigine Valley a 1920x1080 8xAA (preset Extreme HD) se ponen en 88º.
Si me dan problemas lo comentare.
-
It's hard to know about the Patagonico, like that with the specs... it looks like the "Mini Titan", which was rumored. If it comes out, it's possible that the series 7 will be delayed until the end of the year, so that they come out together with the ATI.
I think 5 GB is very interesting if its price is around $600, it could be a very good graphics card and not so far from the Titan and if the series 7 and onwards only have 3GB and at a price lower than $400, otherwise it wouldn't make sense.-
Regards.-
-
Sometimes I'm not more stupid because I don't train:
:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall:
Bueno, arreglado ;D Y sí, it yields more in physics a single Titan than two GTX580 in SLI....
Claro al final todo tiene lógica,esa Titan debe ser potente con physX, ya las 4x0 y 5x0 sobretodo gama
alta se defendian muy bien y la 6x0 son aun mas potentes, por eso la Titan debe ser la mejor sin duda.
It's not that physics don't work, we're just talking about the physics test of vantage, not the games that use Physx ;).
pues mira a ver si has metido configuración personalizada a Vantage,por que si funciona en juegos igual debe funcionar en Vantage,a ver si lo tienes como lo muestra Pepillo.
Saludos
-
I come from an SLI of GTX 460. The graphics behave very similarly; in stock, I have one at 0.875 V and the other at 0.887 V. At maximum performance at 106% and 95º both stabilize at 1.150 V.
I intended to update their BIOS but for gaming, which is what I bought them for, the throttling hardly bothers (in stock at 100% 80º it is more evident). After several passes in the Unigine Valley loop at 1920x1080 8xAA (Extreme HD preset) they get to 88º.
If they give me problems I will comment.
By the way, in case anyone is interested, the 750W power supply (a Corsair TX750 V1) that I had before has not given me any problems with the TITAN so far.
-
MaLDoHD for Crysis 2: Performance bug in Crysis 3 first level
Puffff…. I hadn't noticed that, of course my performance by graphics being somewhat interior didn't make me realize it (in the first phase I didn't stop to see the downpour much).
Quite a strange problem that.
Wargreymon, don't be fake and answer ELP3 what you thought of the little one, you know very well that you weren't left unsatisfied and you didn't put only 4 MODs, jajaja (you are a beast with MODs). ;D
You already know that except that the VRAM of the graphics gets very full (to the limit to the limit), the issue didn't seem to go "so bad" for you. More so if we compare figures with more capable cards (and with more VRAM to fill anyway).
-
Ya..bueno,es que esa gráfica y lo de los 2Gb es de juzgado de guardia..pero bueno..aparte de eso,te ha gustado?
Un saludo.
Dejando eso de lado sí que me ha gustado sí, tampoco es un supercambio respecto a la HD6950 pero si que va bastante mejor en casi todos los juegos, sobretodo hablando de MS, en este sentido pasandole la mano por la cara también a la HD7950 que tuve.
Me la compré pensando en poner otra en SLI en caso de que funcionara bien en el Skyrim con MODs, y bueno, con los MODs antiguos si que iba bien, pero al ponerle unos cuantos nuevos la pobre se ha rendido ;).
Wargreymon, no seas falso y contesta a ELP3 qué te ha parecido la pequeñaja, que bien sabes que no te ha dejado ni descontento ni le has puesto sólo 4 MODs, jajaja (que mira que eres bestia con los MODs).
Ya sabes que excepto que se apure mucho la VRAM de la gráfica (al límite al límite), el tema no parecía irte "tan mal". Más si comparamos cifras con tarjetas más capaces (y con más VRAM que llenar de todas formas).
Jaja pues si, el Skyrim con MODs es el único juego donde he visto el "problemilla" de los 2Gb, el Far Cry 3 por ejemplo va muy bien y en general todos los que no lleguen a 1,5-1,6Gb van muy bien. Para quien no vaya a jugar al Skyrim (O lo vaya a jugar con pocos MODs) me parece una gran GPU a buen precio, más fiable que las de la competencia de este rango de precios la verdad y sin los problemas de MS tan característicos…
Respecto al vantage no me había fijado en esa opción, me habrá pasado como a Pepillo seguramente si...
Saludos
-
By the way, I just checked something very strange. The benchmark score of Batman and Mafia II seemed a bit low to me. I tried the 3dMark Vantage, and the physics don't work for me, it does them by CPU regardless of what I select in the nVidia control panel. Is anyone else experiencing this?
Thanks
It's a driver issue Pepillo, I've already seen that it's been solved, but once with the trio of 670, the physics in Batman wouldn't activate for me, I had to uninstall and do a driver cleanup, if you install some on top of others they get silly…
Best regards
By the way, in case anyone is interested, the 750W power supply (a Corsair TX750 V1) I had before hasn't given me any problems with the TITANs so far.
First of all, congratulations.!! They are beasts and after the change you've made you're going to freak out..!!
And regarding the power supply, what is the rest of the equipment?, because those 750W are too tight, that power supply will be working at 100%. Start thinking about changing it, lest it palms and takes something with it…....
This is the consumption of my sli with a 3930 at 4.9 Ghz.
Counting that you don't have an SB-E, you'll be around 600 and some, without knowing the rest of the pc. I wouldn't risk it with a peak consumption…..And a couple of titans in the equipment.
Best regards..
P.D. With stock graphics, like I overclocked them, calculate at least 100W more...!!!!
P.D. 2, I've seen that you have a 950 with Oc, the consumptions of that don't differ much from mine. Be careful with the oc on the gpu...........!!
-
First of all, congratulations.!! They are beasts and after the change you've made, you're going to be amazed..!!
And regarding the power supply, what is the rest of the team?, because those 750W are too tight, that power supply will be working at 100%. Start thinking about changing it, so that it doesn't fry and take something with it…....
This is the consumption of my sli with a 3930 at 4.9 Ghz.
Counting that you don't have an SB-E, you'll be around 600 and some big ones, without knowing the rest of the pc. I wouldn't risk it with a peak of consumption…..And a couple of titans in the team.
Best regards..
P.D. With stock graphics, like I mentioned, add at least 100W more...!!!!
P.D. 2, I've seen that you have a 950 with OC, the consumptions of that are not far from mine. Be careful with the OC on the gpu...........!!
Thanks! Well I don't have anything out of the ordinary: 3 fans of 12cm, 3 HDDs, a DVD burner, three memory modules, the i7 950 that I mentioned before and the TITANs.
I won't deny that I was thinking of buying a new power supply but after reading this review (Review: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN in SLI - Graphics - HEXUS.net - Page 9), in which they used an i7-3770K with a TITAN SLI without problems, I thought about waiting and seeing how I was doing with the 750W.
Anyway, I'm not ruling out buying one soon so that I can do an OC on the TITANs in good conditions and be more secure.
-
¡Esta publicación está eliminada! -
Thanks! Well, I don't have anything out of the ordinary: 3 x 12cm fans, 3 HDDs, a DVD burner, three memory modules, the i7 950 that I mentioned before and the TITANs.
I won't deny that I was thinking of buying a new power supply, but after reading this review (Review: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN in SLI - Graphics - HEXUS.net - Page 9), in which they used an i7-3770K with SLI of TITAN without problems, I thought about waiting and seeing how I was doing with the 750W.
Anyway, I'm not ruling out buying one soon so that I can do an OC on the TITANs in good conditions and be more secure.
No need..!
The 3770k has a TDP of 77W, ours of 130w, I doubt that 3770 had OC, but even so, when you put OC on ours, the consumption goes up to around 200W.
True, I haven't mentioned it before, but there I have RL circuits (2 pumps, of which only one is now working) and about 20 fans…:ugly: (small detail...........xD). Two SSDs and two WD Black.
So take away about 100W from my rig from the RL. That's very high. Your PC's consumption must be around 600/650 W. Even so, I see it as too tight when you put OC on the twins, that power supply is going to suffer. Also, I don't know if you've noticed, but when your rig is under load, it has to make more noise, the power supply fan will go up in revs.
Besides, it will be consuming more than it should. For a power supply to work well, it should be at 50/60% of its load, it would be its point where the work/consumption curve would be better positioned.
This is the efficiency graph of your power supply.
There you'll see what I'm talking about. The power supply is the backbone of a PC, if you give it wrong voltages in any component or overload it, you risk burning something. I'm not a fan of putting 1000W power supplies where they really aren't needed. But you would really benefit from one of those…..
Not because of the consumption, although yes, if not for the efficiency.
I myself have an Enermax Revolutions of 1250W, with about 4 years on its back, always working in rigs with high consumption. I'm really surprised how well it goes, with the work I've given it.
Recently I had it almost 6 months at the limit with a 4 way of 580. Playing always I was at 1100W. As soon as I put OC on those GPUs, and ran a 3Dmark, the power supply went to peaks of 1500W, and turned off for safety.
Now soon I'll put another Titan, and I calculate that I'll be again at those 1000/1100W. You notice a lot when the power supply is working like that, it stops being silent, and heats up a lot more. So I'll probably make the change to a 1500W. To be calm with that issue.
It's a very good power supply, but any day I say until here............:troll:
A consumption meter like the one I put in the image is worth nothing and less in any shopping center, in case you want to get out of doubts really............. ;).
Best regards
-
No hay de que..!
The 3770k has a TDP of 77W, ours of 130w, I doubt that 3770 has OC, but even so, when you put OC on ours, the consumption goes up to near 200W.
True, I haven't mentioned before, that I have RL circuits in there (2 pumps, of which only one is now working) and about 20 fans…:ugly: (small detail...........xD). Two SSDs and two WD Black.
So take away about 100W from my rig from the RL, being very high. Your PC's consumption must be around 600/650 W. Still, I see it as too tight when you put OC on the twins, this power supply will suffer. Also, I don't know if you've noticed, but when your rig is under load, it has to make more noise, the power supply fan will rev up.
Besides, it will be consuming more than it should. For a power supply to work well, it should be at 50/60% of its load, it would be its point where the work/consumption curve would be better positioned.
This is the efficiency graph of your power supply.
There you will see what I'm talking about. The power supply is the backbone of a PC, if you give it wrong voltages to any component or overload it, you risk burning something. I'm not a fan of putting 1000W power supplies where they really aren't needed. But you would really benefit from one of those…..
Not because of the consumption, although yes, but because of the efficiency.
I myself have an Enermax Revolutions of 1250W, with about 4 years on its back, always working in rigs with high consumption. I'm really surprised how well it goes, with the work I've given it.
Recently I had it almost 6 months at the limit with a 4 way of 580. When gaming, I was always at 1100W. As soon as I put OC on those GPUs, and ran a 3Dmark, the power supply went to peaks of 1500W, and turned off for safety.
Now soon I will put another Titan, and I calculate that I will be again at those 1000/1100W. You notice a lot when the power supply is working like that, it stops being silent, and heats up a lot more. So I will probably make the switch to a 1500W. To be calm with that issue.
It's a very good power supply, but any day I say until here............:troll:
A power consumption meter like the one I put in the image is worth nothing and less in any shopping center, in case you want to get out of doubts really............. ;).
Best regards
Totally agree that 750W power supply is working at the limit
Here is Guru3D's power supply recommendation:
GeForce GTX Titan - On your average system the card requires you to have a 550 Watt power supply unit.
GeForce GTX Titan 2x SLI - On your average system the cards require you to have a 800 Watt power supply unit as minimum.
GeForce GTX Titan 3x SLI - On your average system the cards require you to have a 1000~1200 Watt power supply unit as minimum.We'll be calculating the GPU power consumption here, not the total PC power consumption.
GeForce GTX Titan 3-way SLI and Multi monitor review - Power Consumption
Salu2.
-
If anyone is interested, I can provide screenshots, but after a week with the Titan, in terms of its comparison with my previous SLI of GTX580, I can affirm without any doubt that the Titan is superior.
I have passed the typical batteries of tests, with a very limited overclock, only the GPU offset +50 (1.071 Mhz of Boost), without touching memories, and with the 980X at 4.400 Mhz by multiplier. Then I have compared with scores that I had saved from the previous SLI, all of them at the maximum that my GTX580 gave (between 850 and 900 of core with the memories also raised) and with the processor more raised in most cases because before I had a liquid cooling that I dismantled, and the results are always favorable to the Titan, sometimes by little, others by a fairly large margin. It doesn't matter if it's the Vantage, the 2011, the new 3dMark, Batman, Metro, etc., I always beat my previous record.
And this, with half the consumption, without noise (it is a real tomb next to the SLI of GTX580, I will not tire of saying it), and without the problems associated with SLI (microshuttering or lack of profiles in recent games).
Each day that passes I am happier, it exceeded my expectations this monster of graphics.
Greetings
-
Wow, I didn't think I'd see so many Titans in the forum, leñes :troll:
And, the move from a 460 SLI to 2 titans, wow...plus if you can say that the 460 is depreciated (what a great card, really...I feel like I didn't get enough out of it when I had it in the main, that's the only thing).
Anyway, enjoy them and give us healthy Nvidia
Regards!!
-
¡Esta publicación está eliminada! -
If anyone is interested, I can provide screenshots, but after a week with the Titan, in terms of its comparison with my previous SLI of GTX580, I can affirm without any doubt that the Titan is superior.
I have passed the typical batteries of tests, with a very limited overclock, only the GPU offset +50 (1.071 Mhz of Boost), without touching memories, and with the 980X at 4.400 Mhz by multiplier. Then I have compared with scores that I had saved from the previous SLI, all of them at the maximum that my GTX580 gave (between 850 and 900 of core with the memories also raised) and with the processor more raised in most cases because before I had a liquid cooling that I dismantled, and the results are always favorable to the Titan, sometimes by little, others by a fairly large margin. It doesn't matter if it's the Vantage, the 2011, the new 3dMark, the Batman, the Metro, etc., I always beat my previous record.
And this, with half the consumption, without noise (it is a real tomb next to the SLI of GTX580, I will not get tired of saying it), and without the problems associated with SLI (microshuttering or lack of profiles in recent games).
Each day that passes I am happier, it exceeded my expectations this monster of graphics.
Greetings
Pepillo, with permission of ELP3 contribute all the screenshots you can. I had an SLI of 580 before changing to the GTX 690.
Best regards
-
¡Esta publicación está eliminada! -
Pepillo, con permiso de ELP3 aporta todas las capturas que puedas. Yo tenia un SLI de 580 antes de cambiar a la GTX 690.
Así, rápido, te paso unos 3dMark de la Titan contra el SLI de GTX580. El Firestrike:
El Vantage:
El 2011:
Ya miraré de poner más, tengo las capturas muy desordenadas debido al formateo y me cuesta encontrar lo que busco. Con los benchmarks de Futuremark es un momento darle a comparar resultados.
Saludos
Edito:
Un Unigine 4 de regalo:
-
I see that the fire strike results with the 980 don't change at all compared to the 3930K. It defends itself very well. Man, we had almost the same equipment, lol, how curious.
