@Sylver:

Si, Intel rinde bastante por encima de AMD en cada una de las gamas (Baja, Media y Alta). Potencia bruta, buena arquitectura, quizás algo calientes los Ivy por ejemplo, pero nada escandaloso.

Para muestra un botón, ojea las firmas de los veteranos, raro será que no veas un Intel en el primer equipo

Saludos

Es cierto, pero también AMD tiene micros muy majos, que rinden algo menos pero también son más baratos. EL AMD 8320 ronda los 135€ y es un muy buen micro, con buena capacidad de overclock y no se mueve mal en juegos. Lo que se ahorra en el micro lo puede invertir en una mejor gráfica o ahorrar en un futuro algo más para un Disco duro SSD. Los Intel rinden más pero los AMD no son cojos.

@Obione:

You will barely notice the memory, as if you buy these and put them at 1600MHz as I have done:

Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1333 PC3-10600 8GB 2x4GB CL9 BLS2CP4G3D1339DS1S00 DDR3 Memory

Editing:

http://xtremmedia.com/?q=cconfig/view#A003640,A001648,A022012,A001243,A008383,A017612

I would get that with the cheap 1333 memories and the rest of the parts that are not on that list at pccomponentes, about 370€ including shipping, in total less than 800.

Thank you very much!! Even better then!! I spend less on memory and if I can I can upgrade it elsewhere!!
Thanks again for the answer man!!

for that money it's not bad, besides the A10 has very good graphics
AMD A10-6800K 4.10Ghz - integrated Radeon HD 8670D
the only thing would be to put more memory if you work with images, the rest is enough
the BitFenix Prodigy case is available in several different colors
goodbye

Here you have some temperatures and voltages on the left. The fans are set to silent mode, that is, up to 65 degrees for the processor, and 60 for the graphics card, they do not exceed 45% speed. That is with the CPU at 4GHz, which is the best MHz/Temperature position I have found.

http://xtremmedia.com/?q=cconfig/view#A002712,A009750,A001648,A002314,A019415,A021846,A008383,A001243_op,A000987

Before leaving me such a pile of money on the plate, case and power supply, I would spend it on other components :ugly:

You put a couple of GT on top, taking out air and served. 1850 if you're going to regulate them, 1150 without regulation.

You can scratch it on SSD getting the 120 one or on graphics with a 770 4GB (although I'll stick with a 780 from lost to the river), also improving disipation, the S12II seems like enough power supply to me. What I want to tell you is that the money should be on the graphics, scratch it on components that don't have an impact on performance, I wouldn't get anything above the Z77-D3H, unless you're looking for SLI, which even then I wouldn't get anything above the Extreme4. If you have extra money and you put a GPU well, like if you get a card for 200€.

By the way, the 8970 is coming out soon, if you're not in a hurry it would be good to wait. It's only a couple of months, there's not a graphic generation jump every day...

PD: If you build it yourself I would ask for a cooler on pccomponentes, the HR-02 or an Archon are very good and cost little more than the EVO.

I think it's the best option unless you opt for a low-power micro like the i3-2100T (I stayed there, sorry, I'm outdated :ugly:) and put a decent dedicated graphics card, which don't consume much in idle these days.

But at the current price of the PS3, that option will be cheaper and with fewer headaches.

Well, they say that if something is good and cheap, it's twice as good.
I definitely have to change stores...

Yes, you have it, I want to put in an a10 and compact that area at home, I look forward to those photos.

Regards

@NONO:

well I think I've decided on the i5 now, I'll see the model I don't want to spend a fortune if I'm not going to get the most out of it. I'm not going to overclock so I think I can save myself the cooler. But I also don't want it to be short in 2 years

Mande? Let's see it's a processor, not the size of a pair of pants, you buy the best you can and when it becomes obsolete then what are you going to do... The biggest difference is between the normal and "K" ones that are good for OC and a little less i5 or i7 with/without HT that performs a little more, but it's not a huge difference.

I confirm my doubt, final configuration completed and assembled, and working: CASE: Antec P183 V3 POWER SUPPLY: Corsair TX750W MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z87-G45 GAMING PROCESSOR: Intel Haswell i7 4770K 3'5Ghz HEATSINK: Noctua NF-U12S RAM: 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3 2133 GSKILL CL9 GRAPHICS: Sapphire HD7950 3GB SSD: Crucial M500 240GB HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB WRITER: LG 24x Flying, it's perfect!! and for what he asked for, now it's missing his 2 monitors of 27" QHD and the FHD that he already has.

I found this motherboard that looks really good, what do you think? Intel® Desktop Board DB85FL

Never mind, it's not mini ITX

Muchas gracias

Bueno, pues me ha costado más de lo que esperaba… por la sencilla razón de que no puedo ser conservador a la hora de elegir componentes... que le voy a hacer, me gustan grandes. Aún así. ahí van dos configuraciones: Biostar Hi-Fi B85S3 ≈ 63 € Intel BX80646G3220 ≈ 60€ G.Skill 8GB DDR3-1333 ≈ 63 € 2 XFX FX-777A-ZDF4 ≈ 184 € UDD Toshiba 500GB ≈ 45 € DVDR LiteOn iHAS524 ≈ 25 € Zalman ZM-T2 ≈ 21 € Aerocool AP-550 ≈ 36€ Total ≈ 600 € con IVA AMD Athlon II X3 450 ≈ 57 € Biostar A780L3C Ver. 7.x ≈ 37 € MSI R7850-2GD5/OC ≈ 153 € G.Skill 8GB DDR3-1333 ≈ 63 € UDD Toshiba 500GB ≈ 45 € DVDR LiteOn iHAS524 ≈ 25 € Zalman ZM-T2 ≈ 21 € Aerocool AP-550 ≈ 36€ Total ≈ 520 con IVA Es que, sinceramente y lo digo de verdad, me duele poner algo más barato. Edito: Perdona hombre, es que estos días ando algo espeso. :ugly: Edito 2: Esto es lo más menos que puedo aportar a ésta diabólica rama. ;D Biostar A780L3C Ver. 7.x ≈ 37 € AMD Athlon II X2 270 ≈ 47 € MSI R7750-PMD2GD3 ≈ 82 € G.Skill 8GB DDR3-1333 ≈ 63 € UDD Toshiba 500GB ≈ 45 € DVDR LiteOn iHAS524 ≈ 25 € Zalman ZM-T2 ≈ 21 € Aerocool AP-550 ≈ 36€ Total ≈ 430 con IVA Nota: en estas configuraciones, nada de OC (traen disipadores de casa), y los paneles laterales de la torre fuera, para poner un ventilador que sople todo el año. Configuración 3D a máxima resolución, sin filtros y con el vSync apagado para arañar fps. Detalles medio, detalle del modelo alta, distancia de visión máximo, iluminación medio, detalle de la textura alto, detalle del agua bajo, detalle de las sombras bajo o muy bajo, detalles adicionales vegetación, etc, bajo. Válido para casi todos los juegos.

@Obione: ¿Si hablas de lo primero no hay agradecimiento? Campaña por el uso de tildes :llorar: Jajaja no me había fijado :risitas:, anda que eso seguro que nos ha pasado a todos

Quadro graphics or Ati Crossfire do not improve performance much when working in 2D, it does not justify the price of a Quadro, a decent domestic graphics card is preferable.
Where it is noticeable is when working in 3D, when moving models or working with models with all their textures.

Graphics cards also do not help when calculating final renders. 3Ds Max or similar programs use the processor to calculate images, in fact, several computers on a network are usually used for the calculations of a large animation or image.

Autodesk - Certified Hardware - Find Recommended Hardware
autodesk says which driver it has tested with each graphics card and which it recommends with each program and version.

Hello
I work with autocad + 3Ds with many layers and models of considerable complexity, I will tell you about my experience

To work in 2D you don't need a Quadro with good conventional graphics, a conventional graphics card is enough.
The renders are usually calculated by the processor, so you don't need a Quadro for this part. What you need to calculate the renders is a powerful processor with as many cores as possible.

The Quadro graphics card is good for two things:
For the first one I don't think you will use it unless you are very very professional, calculating part of the renders with the new RT version of Vray that works in real time and bla, bla, bla, to work with this you need a very high-end Quadro or a Tesla (a lot of money)

For the second thing that the Quadro is good for you will use it and you will get a lot out of it, it is good for visualizing in real time the model with textures, shadows, lights,… while you are working. This is also achieved with any other graphics card but there is no comparison in how agile the model moves and the quality of textures that a Quadro achieves.

I have the Quadro 2000, the 600 is not bad but it might be a bit short.

Keep in mind that a Quadro with characteristics (type of memory, amount of memory and processing speed) much worse on paper than a conventional graphics card of the type (GTX760), work much better in reality in 3ds Max, 3D in Autocad and similar programs,
but don't ask it to perform well with the latest game because the GTX will beat it and humiliate it.

I went to the Autodesk page where they recommend Graphics that have specific drivers for each program: Autodesk - Certified Hardware - Find Recommended Hardware

I take off my hat. CHAPEAU!!!:sisi: