@garfield said in Open processors are gaining followers:
@kynes said in Open processors are gaining followers:
Today it might have worked better, since multi-threaded programming has developed a lot, but back then it was a suicide and they ended up going bankrupt.
I think that's where their problem was. They were visionaries, but the technology that we have now didn't exist. The thing with 8 instructions in parallel, is that what AMD wants to use now to increase their performance in the ryzen 3?
From what I've read, not exactly. I think what AMD wants to do is what IBM does with the Power, like a hyperthreading of 4 threads per core to take advantage of the units that are not active, and widen the cores with more decoding units, integer, floating point... not 2 as until now. They are still 64-bit instructions that internally distributes them and executes them as it can.
Transmeta's thing was more heavy, their instructions internally were 256 bits, to package 8 of 32 bits per cycle, so if they couldn't parallelize in the interpreter, they put nop instructions to fill in.