For a Ryzen 3000 (AM4) I have seen boards that support 128 GB. An AMD Ryzen Threadripper may already support 8 slots on its boards.

4 slots should be 4 x 32 GB, maybe it is more expensive, than 8 x 16 GB.

Here I see prices a bit cheaper from 599

https://www.alternate.es/Memoria-RAM/DDR4/html/listings/1463484198294?lk=12626&sort=PRICE&order=ASC&hideFilter=false&showFilter=false&filter_2728=131072.0

Good article

1.45 v.
Take a quick screenshot and turn it off.

@jesmedgo19 Well, I would consider it (the dehumidifier) seriously, a PC not turning on the first time is not normal.

One capable of collecting 750 mL/day for 25 m2 would be advisable.

I think it's a matter of the operating system, given what you said about the reboots being "to start up", that is, at the beginning.
I understand that once it starts up and enters Windows, the system is stable. You'll keep us posted.

Best regards

@AXUS That thermal paste is good. In principle, if the system is stable and does not have strange behaviors, there would be no need to worry. However, monitor the temperatures with some software to be at ease about it.

Regards

What a great piece of work. I'm happy for AMD, I was looking forward to seeing their micros in laptops. Let's see if more laptops with AMD micros appear gradually, as in the overmensa Ryzen it is doing very well.

Well, I've only been using DDR4 for barely two years (at home I have DDR3 and 2 to get bored, also some DDR1) and it feels like a distant memory to use this type of memory yet

But well, advances and technology do not stop!

We'll see the prices and the impact on performance they will offer.

Of luxury then I was a good chicken and because of laziness to open the tower, disconnect cables and such to look at the S/N I lost 25€ on Steam, by the time I got around to it the promo to post an opinion on the website had expired :..( In the end I got rid of the MSI B450, the C6H was too juicy at 125€ on Alternate. Editing: By the way the NVMe that looks pretty good performance/price is the Sabrent on Amazon.

This vulnerability affects :

6th Generation Core 7th Generation Core 8th Generation Core 9th Generation Core 10th Generation Core Xeon E3 V5 Xeon E3 V6 Xeon E-2100 Xeon E-2200 

And for now it seems almost impossible to exploit it remotely.

Salu2!

I haven't seen it either, guys. I noticed that it could go up in price years ago and that's what happened. I also upgraded my RAM because I saw that the 2x4GB DDR3 modules that fit (same model, for compatibility reasons) were a good price, around 60€ at home, and after 2 months they were around 20€ more expensive. The thing is that in the end I bought a little bit because of the fear of a price increase and compatibility, and for bad habits I think I would have done just as well with 8GB. Now I see people rushing to get 2x16GB for the same purpose, and sure the price per mega is good but, I don't think it's worth oversizing (and even less so out of fear), you can always add more later. P.D.: The Chinese are eating us xD They won't have it easy in this oligopoly of 3 but, if they succeed and lower prices, I won't complain

Is it me or does disabling TSX to avoid the bug result in improved performance?

TSX (Transactional Synchronization Extensions) is used to improve performance when running multiple threads simultaneously. It appeared with Haswell in 2013. If it is deactivated, it can cause losses of up to 40% (which was the improvement that Intel announced) although the benchmark tests that have been done so far are demonstrating that in reality it did not improve performance too much. In the end, it is going to be demonstrated that some of these extensions were nothing more than marketing. On the other hand, it seems that this failure and those that are to come related to Hyper Threading are going to penalize performance when running programs with intensive use of multithreading.

I came by here with my **Sandy** without making much noise and I continue to read peacefully this interesting forum of ours (Little saint, let me stay as I am) Greetings!

Thanks for the replies !

Well, both components are quite old. The power supply is a Tacens, I can't remember the model, and the motherboard is an Asus P5W DH Deluxe. I would almost bet on the power supply, but I'll check the capacitors on the motherboard, just in case. I hope it's the power supply, as it's less "painful" if that's the only thing I need to change.

Best regards!

It's not that the improvement is huge, but a boot time that is 5 seconds better is a considerable improvement. Going from 472 to 480fps is also not a big deal, about a 2% improvement. But putting it into perspective, an improvement like this with just a bios seems like a big deal to me.

@krampak I'm not entirely sure how to handle this. The idea of doing mini-reviews in the test bench thread in the end has made it impossible to locate a specific model and there's a mix of stories that don't make much sense.

This way, the one who has the CPU in question has the opportunity to give their impressions, do their own mini-review or whatever and keep everything more organized.

I think what they want to do is reserve a part of the ram to store some data related to private keys, a virtual ram. But I don't know if that will solve the problem. It would be too much if it were another ram socket to put on the boards