@Espinetenbolas:

Pues yo veo que esa GPU está infrautilizada…. nunca va a tope

Lo que significa que seguramente tu CPU o bien hace cuello de botella o bien el OC es inestable.

Por tanto si compras otra gráfica más potente estarás en las mismas.

Lamentablemente un FX 8350 es un procesador bastante mediocre para jugar porque los juegos no están optimizados para multinucleo... por tanto menos nucleos y más Mhz es lo que hace falta para jugar.

Ojo no digo que sea un mal procesador pero su arquitectura ya tiene como 5 años y se ha demostrado que intentaron avanzar en la dirección equivocada.

En cuanto a comprar una Fury X... permiteme que te enlace a lo viene a partir del 27 de mayo:

• GeForce GTX 1070 anunciada, llegará en Junio por 379$ - El Chapuzas Informático
• GeForce GTX 1080 anunciada, más rápida que dos GTX 980 por 599$ - El Chapuzas Informático
• La GeForce GTX 1080 mueve el DOOM a 200 FPS en Ultra bajo la API Vulkan - El Chapuzas Informático

nVidia saca sus Pascal y por 599$ tienes una gráfica mucho más potente que una Titan X que ahora cuesta en tienda unos 1200€.

Sobra decir que la gente esta empezando a malvender en foros de 2ªmano y en eBay sus tarjetas antes de que se terminen de devaluar puesto que una 980Ti se estima que tendrá un rendimiento similar a las GTX1070 que se venderá por 379$

Y eso por parte de nVidia… AMD sacara también sus Polaris pero no se sabe todavia nada.

Si, esta infrautilizada y la prueba es q no se calienta.
No hace cuello de botella la cpu,,nunca llega a su tope de carga el tope queda lejos,, el o.c. es estable,,
con otros juegos muevo graficos increíbles y la frequencia y carga de gpu y memorias esta a full como en el starwarsbattlefront,, opciones graficas todo a tope y scalada de resolución al 120% o gtaV en este no lo pongo todo a tope pero la gpu y memoria trabajan como deven o Project cars también funciona bien.
con gta V se pone la CPU al 100% de carga. eso si que es consumir cpu.

muy buena esa 1070 si rinde y vale lo que dices pero me ira bien en un amd?????????:mudo:

dejo una captura de la gpu y memoria funcionando bien con miscreated.

http://i64.tinypic.com/27xnkle.jpg

@defaultuser:

What is the normal QPI speed on your motherboard? Check it and don't overclock the QPI, it's almost certainly that, and if not, in the meantime, review the basic overclocking guides.

Regards.

There's no complication in raising the CPU multiplier, but to raise the bus, you have to keep some speeds below their maximum, and that's done by setting them to manual and selecting multipliers that leave them at their normal speed or below.

I haven't touched modern Intels yet, so I can't clarify it directly for you, but anyway, your question is basic, the BCLK is the one that the others are multiplied from, and if you follow up, I'll write you a particular guide, so first, check the basics in the guides.

Regards.

P.D.: The northbridge is naturally another thing you have to control, with the basics you already do overclocking, it's not difficult, and in the guides they'll tell you the precautions you have to take.

Hello:

Do you have the multi-core rendering option in advanced graphics settings in Team Fortress 2? You have to activate it. I mention it because I play with the signature team at 1440p (2560*1440) and on 32-player servers, and with everything on high or very high, without filters, the game runs well with the signature team. It may have some dips at times of nearby explosions or things like that but it is perfectly playable. And my resolution requires much more power than Full HD. I also don't know if you play it with many filters in which case it is normal that it can lag.

On the other hand, it is not the best micro for OC as they tell you, but man it is not such a bad team, don't worry.

Have you noticed on the control panel, in the hardware section, what mode it is in? The mode that does not use power savings is PERFORMANCE. Salu2! @claudito16:

hello I have a little problem,
Last week the machine was running fine I turned it off, the next day, the temperature went to 88°C and the frequency of the "i7 4790k" micro went down to 800MHz (according to what I was told x a defense of the mother against overtemps) the mother is a "Asus Maximus Hero VII", I discovered at the time of changing the watercooling (H80i GT, 3 months of use) x the factory one that the problem was the pump, since with the stock cooler the temp was about 45°C and the micro went back to its frequency of 4.4GHz

I continued going with the purchase invoice for the change of the equipment. A week with the new H80i GT installed the temps returned to normal of about 30~35°C but the Vcore voltages were high, 1.29v (No OC), what I did was to do an OC adaptive mode but to lower the voltage and maintaining the turbo frequency at 4.4GHz.

The problem is that the micro now does not reduce the voltage and lower the frequency just but rather it gets stuck at 1.177v and 4.4GHz, in other words in a few words it would not be respecting the adaptive configuration

My configuration is:
CM 690 advanced II
i7 4790k
Asus Maximus Hero VII
H80i GT
2x2 GB HyperX Blu 1600MHz 9.9.9.24, 8GB HyperX Blu 1600MHz 9.9.9.24 (12gb total) without OC are at 1333Mhz
3TB WD black
240 SSD hyperX Savage
CM 700W silent pro
R9 280X Tri-X Vapor-X

thanks I hope you help me, for me the micro is left half broken

My Asrock motherboard allows some overclocking, although these micros are intended for low power uses or as HTPCs, for which they are more than competent. I used it as an HTPC and now as a PC at my parents' house, but I don't play anything more recent than a decade xD.

R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hello!

It didn't happen before, that's why I've noticed it and it's not that it will be noticed much with that small variation but I'm curious to know what it could be.

It's more about letting me, it doesn't even let me set the clock to a fixed value. If I disable all the saving systems the pc consumes 4.2 but within win it directly sets it to 4095 neither going up nor down (as it should be but at 4.2) instead if I activate the systems it goes to 4.2 with its typical variation for saving but it's about putting stress on it and going down to 4095. I've used Aida64, passmark, prime95, cpuid stress test... it always happens the same thing. :wall:

@Javisoft:

I ask because I find it hard to believe that latency and more win validation :ugly:

Well if you find that hard to believe, don't look at the results he has above xD

The FSB is not at the maximum of the motherboard, if anything it is at the theoretical maximum (for what it is designed for) but you can overclock. You should be able to increase it more, doesn't the BIOS let you do it?

If it doesn't boot up, it might be because by increasing the FSB you are also increasing the speed of the memory and you would have to play with a divider to reduce the speed of the memory as you increase the FSB, that or relax latencies or increase voltages, there can be several things but what is clear is that with a processor without an unlocked multiplier you can only increase by means of the motherboard bus.

Anyway, if you have already increased it from 2.83 to 3.4 it is not bad at all, from there you may need more voltage and better refrigeration. That there are people who have increased it to 3.9 or 4Ghz means nothing since you don't know with what motherboard/chip/refrigeration/voltages they have achieved it.

I would almost bet that you are missing CPU voltage and that probably from 3.4Ghz it will start to ask for quite a lot of voltage (it always depends on the luck you have with the chip).

Edit:

1.2-1.3V - for a FSB of ~400 MHz.
1.4-1.5V – for a FSB of ~420-440 MHz (exceed 1.4V at your own risk with a 45nm chip)!
1.6V – for a FSB of ~440-475 MHz - use at your own risk with a 45nm chip!

You should be aware that newer 45nm fab chips are MUCH less tolerant toward high VTT than their 65nm predecessors. Anantech published their experience frying a QX9650 with high VTT’s as an example.

Vcc – Initially, set within 200-400 mV of where the auto setting used (remember that you need a little more in the BIOS compared to what CPU-Z told you). Remember to consult Intel’s processor finder to know where the upper-end of safety is for your processor (I believe the figures there correspond to the values CPU-Z is displaying, not what you set in the BIOS.).

DRAM – What ever the RAM manufacture recommends is a good starting point. Unless you’re really overdriving them, they shouldn’t need more.

SBCore – I’ve always used the lowest setting, but I typically don’t push my systems that hard (20-25 %). You’re on your own here.

NBCore – Start off low, 1.33 or 1.37 and see if you need more. Also, a little bit can go a long way. My system is unstable @ 1.330V here but stable @ 1.370V which is a difference of only 40 mV (0.04V).

...and remember, this test is sponsored by...

Hello sabinin, you have excellent material as usual in your contributions.
I understand that you are sponsored by Seasonic and Kingston but is it really necessary that you always put the photos of the hard drive and the power supply?
As a user, I would like you to do more tests besides those competitions and if possible a comparison with other memories (or the type of hardware you are testing).
I also invite you to participate in our own Hardlimit competition based on the SuperPi version of 2M, that ranking has moved little since a long time, surely you will give it life.

Thanks for your contribution and keep it up! ;D

All I can think to say is… What a monstrosity!

I love seeing this kind of extreme OC, but I'm scared to see that vcore of 1.85 at 14 nanometers