Soon competition will return with AMD's Zen

Sent from my M1 using Tapatalk

I don't care about the graphics, I have a separate graphics card

Sent from my JY-S3 using Tapatalk

Hello, if I tell you, the power supply is 700w, the graphics card is a gforce 9600 xfx.

@Kernel1.0:

Good news, the new memory arrived yesterday and I just installed it. Everything worked the first time without touching anything :happygirl.
In case someone finds this post via google and is looking for memory for this board (which I doubt since it's old) the Crucial Ballistix Sport 4GB DDR3-1600 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00 works.

Thanks Espinetenbolas for the Crucial compatibility page.
And Sylver if I decide I'll let you know, it's appreciated.

How happy I am :ugly:

Enoragüena, whatever it is you know, let's go!

Cheers!

Pues eso hare, me sonaba raro ponerlo asi pero por si acaso digo voy a preguntar, gracias por la informacion me has ahorrado muchos posibles quebraderos de cabeza.

Wow, thank you so much!

The answer is amazing, as soon as I get home I will try everything, let's hope it works out.

1000 Thanks.

@Jesk:

Thanks for everything, if I have problems with the hardware again I know where to go :love:

Thanks to you for coming back, to tell that you have solved it :sisi:

Indeed, as Yorus has explained, 2Gb modules.

@whoololon:

I'm afraid that Intel will eventually be left alone.

I think that today it is increasingly less relevant that Intel is left alone. What I see in a few years is that x86 will not have a monopoly on the "PC" but that other players will appear and may even be strong.

On the one hand we have ARM which is currently making do in mobile devices. ARVv7 is timidly entering the desktop since, apart from Raspberry Pi which is a very basic board with very limited power, there are a lot of alternatives for less than 200€ that if they don't match, they exceed in performance the x86 platforms of the same price. And when aarch64 becomes popular, I am sure that a lot of options will appear to build a desktop with a very decent power, at a low price and with moderate consumption.

On the other hand we have RISC-V, which although it is nothing more than an ISA, some heavyweights of the industry have shown their interest which indicates that it is possible that the architecture will eventually materialize.

Regarding software compiled for x86, with Microsoft's ARM tablets we saw how "fast" and "easy" it was to port a complete operating system and key programs to ARM. On the other hand, Valve has already ported the Source engine and some games to ARM to run on Nvidia's platforms (I can't remember the name right now).

So if Intel is left alone in x86, I don't think it will be a great tragedy. Moreover, it may be that this makes new and interesting options flourish apart from the veteran architecture.

hello everyone, the distributor has given me a price and these are very well priced, in fact, the boss would give them to me for free lol the problem is that I don't know which of the 2 to choose. Which are better? natively the motherboard says it accepts up to 2133mhz and for the moment I have no intention of doing oc to the bus.

Which of these 2 do you recommend

http://www.kingston.com/dataSheets/HX321C11T3K2_16.pdf
http://www.kingston.com/dataSheets/HX324C11SRK2_16.pdf

I think the beast ones are better no?

They all have the same distance so there is no problem with that heatsink.

Another one to add in that range... which has just come out and looks very good is the Cryorig M9I

Another thing is that you can find it because it has just come out of the oven

On their website you have more info: http://www.cryorig.com/m9.php ;D

Indeed, my mistake: Z97 is 1150 and Z170 is 1151.

On the other hand, the lapsus makes it clear that the recommended the i5-4690K thinking of a Z97, unless you want to understand something else.

A Z170 configuration is frugal, efficient and perfect for a multipurpose environment, without discrete graphics and without a gamer orientation. :facepalm:

Good luck.

Ya puede ser, yo la mia por ahora robusta como una roca aunque en el PC2 me decanté por la Gigabyte B85M D3H, por precio. Pero la mar de contento con las 2.

Once again I appreciate your comments, with popular wisdom being what I value... here another close to 40... has been using monitors since the 286, so my eyesight is suffering jejejejeje
On the other hand you are right, this topic has fulfilled its function, as soon as I get some money OS I will ask for advice on a monitor, which I use in a varied way, but a larger percentage for gaming, although not as much as I would like....
Once again a thousand thanks...

As Espinete says, for high-end OCs, it's better to look for a motherboard that can handle it and a matching liquid cooling system.
Knowing the rest of the components would also help decide if it's necessary to push that micro that hard, not because it can't reach 4.5 (there are plenty of guides out there), but because if the rest of the components aren't up to par, it's only going to serve to wear out the motherboard and micro.
As for lasting as long as possible, "long life" and "OC" don't mix well, but a good motherboard with that micro should last you at least 4 more years, that doesn't mean you won't need to upgrade it by adding RAM or renewing the graphics within a year or two. As I said, knowing the rest of the components is also important.

No problem. The only thing is that the FX cooler is nothing special. I used my previous FX-8320 for a few days with the stock cooler, and in winter the noise when it maxed out was unbearable, so I went back to using the cooler I've used with all my computers for years, a Scythe Mugen 1, and everything went back to normal.

Best regards.