@Nemo: Franziskaner, yo he visto montar Tentes a martillazos…la pieza entraba si o si...no digo más. :facepalm: Un saludo hombre ….. yo e visto montar un molex de cuatro patillas al revés :ugly: y eso si que tiene cojones . pero no todo el mundo es tonto como el individuo que lo hizo saludos @amd125: Sí y no, siempre puede dar problemas algún componente, puedes tocar una memoria y joderla con la memoria estática del cuerpo, etc. Y si te viene mal un componentee, que no es lo normal, pues sin experiencia, puedes no saber qué falla. Recuerda tu post: problema con grafica o con otras cosas ¿? - HardLimit Yo llevo años montando ordenadores a amigos, y ayudándoles cuando se les estropean, es un hobby, y en alguna ocasión no me he tirado de los pelos porque voy rapado… si todo va bien, no es complicado, pero como pase algo... y no tengas ni idea de informática, lo llevas claro. el problema de esa gráfica creo recordar que comente que era que los pines de el PCI e estaban llenos de nicotina :wall: en un equipo nuevo dudo que pueda tener tales problemas , el unico problema como ya dije anteriormente que puede tener es que las patillas de el zocalo de el micro estén defectuosas ( que no es el primer caso ) y se coma la placa con patatas , cosa que se soluciona diciendo que te monten el micro en la placa , el resto ….. tiene que ser muy torpe para montar algo mal . de todas forman estamos hablando de montar un equipo en el año 2013 no un equipo de los de "antes" tipo IBM que los cables ide eran "reversibles" y a la mínima de cambio hacías un corto circuito ;D - sobre los "montadores" de las tiendas .... alguno recuerda el caso de aquel chaval que consulto en este foro una configuración nueva , la encargo a una conocida tienda y le montaron el disipador de el micro mal :eoh: pues eso . montar un PC no es difícil (salvo dejar los cables bien ordenados , que requiere bastante paciencia y un mínimo de idea ) pero el resto ;D saludos P.D Max si no lo ves claro practica con el actual ordenador P.D 2 Sylver :nono: tengo que mantener mi ultima reputación de borde ;D

@MaxLG:

What do you have the unlocked multiplier for maybe?

Then I saw that they explained it to you in the other thread. Very well done :troll:

@Sylver:

The ASRock for OC are very good, they come with a very good preparation. Apart from that, it's what amd125 says, they were not very good a while ago, but nowadays they have improved, and how.

Greetings

Well, I got the Asrock xD

The FM2s go up better but an AM3+ can be extended to an x8.

You could also consider buying a dual core G2120 and a B75 Pro3. Some games will appreciate 4 cores but later on you can put together a 3570 with another 2x2GB and have a pretty good setup.

I think you can recover it without soldering anything, just do what Asus says and insert the motherboard CD that already has a bios, and if it doesn't work easily with the CD, try with a floppy disk, I saw people easily recover those P5K because of corrupt bios.

That's why the burner or floppy disk light is blinking, because it's looking for the bios file.

I am answering myself.
I saw this comparison of CPU performance with the game Crysis 2 and the Q6600 gives the E8500 a good beating.

I will get the Q6600 which costs me 47 € which is a very good price.
It will be accompanied by an Ati 5750 1 Gb.
Thanks and goodbye.

jajaja ya ves xD

But the problem is already solved, I have simply increased the minimum RPMs a little, just enough so that it doesn't make noise and these days when it's a bit cool the temp has dropped to 39 degrees

The motherboards are very good, but the problem is the CPUs and as long as Intel doesn't feel like allowing OC it doesn't matter if the motherboards are very good, in the end it will be the CPU temperature that limits OC a lot, as long as Intel doesn't do things right it doesn't matter if the motherboards come well equipped with options in the bios or UEFI.

regards

Haha, I've already ordered it here in France to see if they have the components I want, too late xD
Thanks anyway

@sycopata:

Hello, I don't know if anyone has asked this before, but I don't understand why all the motherboards for Intel 1150 chips incorporate a graphics card, considering that Intel 1150 Haswell chips already incorporate a graphics card, and that most likely anyone who builds a desktop PC will buy a PCI-E graphics card, which is why they put these PCI-E 3.0 16x slots on these boards.
I can understand that an 1150 processor, being an APU, has integrated graphics, after all it can be installed in many more places that are not desktop PCs, what I don't understand is why 1150 motherboards incorporate this integrated graphics card, in my opinion it's a waste of money.

Can someone explain this to me, I'm probably being ignorant.

The boards do not incorporate graphics, they have the connections, either DVI or HDMI, but the graphics are inside the processors, so you won't have problems to put the graphics card you want Pcie.

If you don't put a dedicated Pcie graphics card, you can work with the CPU's one but the board doesn't have IGP, it's the CPU's one, besides that depending on the CPU you put in it could have a different IGP, more or less powerful.

If you put a dedicated one then the dedicated one will work, but the boards only have the video connections and not all of them, it can have VGA, DVI, HDMI and even DP, but the card is not on the board it's on the CPU.

regards

@Javisoft:

I'm still using my 950, it's still going strong XD, it's been overclocked and it's so happy, I'll probably switch to an x99 after seeing the problems with the x79. Regards.

I'm still using a 920 and an R3E, but it seems to be confirmed that a new chipset will be released for IB-E, it will be the X89, they say it will be out in September and that to make it work on an X79, you'll need to flash the bios.

But it's likely that the X89 will already have native USB 3, they'll have fixed the PCIE3 issue (although with Intel, nothing is certain), but we should be seeing X89 motherboards soon, in a few weeks, images will probably start leaking.

That said, the best move would be to wait until the X99 and Haswel-E, plus 8 cores, although Intel might only release an 8 core processor in Extreme edition.

Regards

Of the ones you mention, the one with the lowest power consumption is the Asus. Here is the TDP of the AMD micros for these platforms:

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Fusion

The RaspberryPi is advisable if you like to tinker. As for consumption, no x86 board can match it.

Broadwell will be the 14nm update to Haswell and Skylake will be the next architecture so it's not that long to wait, 2 years at most. That roadmap is for the Xeons that always come out later than the desktops, so maybe 2015, of all it is very speculative because the most likely is that they are working right now on that future architecture and we will see what comes out of there; perhaps the least relevant are the "accessories". Does anyone know if the Xeon Phi are already used for something useful? it is supposed to be for sale :lol:

As ferelxyx rightly points out, the boards are from different platforms, so trying to compare them independently would have to be in relation to their quality within their own ranges and platforms, and it doesn't make much sense.

Visit the Complete Configurations branch to get an idea of what you want, and then ask.

Salu2!

@Daniel83:

I'm fed up already....:wall:

This motherboard has a lot of issues with monitoring, it marks false voltages of 24v on the 12V line, if that were the case everything would be fried.

The other day I got an alarm from the vcore 0.000, very economical, it consumes nothing.

I've tested it with several programs all together at the same time, separately one by one, in a thousand ways. Running Linx with OC at 3.9 is like saying from home and everyone has something wrong. I think I need to take this motherboard to get it checked out because it's still under warranty

If it marks it wrong, send it to warranty, you should look in the UEFI, the hardware monitor section and if it marks wrong I would certainly use the warranty because maybe this motherboard is defective and could possibly break down when it's out of warranty, I wouldn't wait too long, contact the one who sold it to you to process the warranty if it's still valid.

Before that, check if there's a BIOS update
http://support.asus.com/download.aspx?SLanguage=es-es&m=P8Z77-V%20DELUXE&p=1&s=39&os=30&hashedid=OVCFmLeMZdeMER8x

the latest BIOS is 2003, maybe with that it will work well for you.

regards

be calm and ask whatever you want because that's what we're here for

it's been a while since good memory brands give a lifetime warranty
what the manufacturer says is what it's worth, online stores don't update very often

regards

What is XMP 1.3?
Intel Extreme Memory Profile (XMP) is a profile that will allow users to configure their speeds
Without the need to capture each value within the BIOS manually.
The XMP 1.3 standard offers a the ability to explore and modify DRAM timings more precisely and accurately

regards

Era modo "ironic on" pero no por tu respuesta. No me acordaba del nombre en inglés. Estoy ya penil. De ahí el darte las gracias. "No hay palabras mal dichas, sino mal entendidas" y yo me expresé mal y se me entendió mal. Es que si volvía a repetir el mensaje de las almohadillas térmicas iba a sonar borde, y al final soné borde. "Lo siento y no volverá a pasar" juancas dixit.

@jazxz:

Hello everyone:

First of all, I'm somewhat new to the topic of new processors and had some doubts about it. I have the following motherboard P8B75-V from Asus and I want to enable RAM for the integrated graphics of the micro and I understand that the new system used by these micros is DVMT, which dynamically assigns RAM as needed by the program's requirement. I have the option in the bios iGPU Memory [64M]

The issue is that I don't know what value to assign, the value that it defaults to, which is 64, is the maximum that the integrated can reach? I honestly don't know. I've set it to [512] in this section but I'm not sure if it's correct.

My idea is to use lucidvirtual MVP with the integrated graphics. For the moment, I have D-mode, which uses the non-integrated graphics. That is, I'm using an ATI 5870 HD graphics card.

System specifications:

Processor: Intel i7 3770 K

Motherboard: P8B75-V

RAM = 8 GB PNY.

HD: SSD 180 Gb

Greetings to all.

From what I understand, the main idea of MVP is to use the CPU's iGPU as a screen output manager, basically a VGA framebuffer and little more, while the dedicated one is focused on rendering as fast as it can.

As such, the iGPU will barely need RAM to function correctly, it could perfectly work with that 64 MB value you set, but if you have doubts, increase it to 128 MB or at most, excessively, to 256 MB, and with this it should work perfectly well with that combination of graphics managed by lucidlogix technology.

However, as I see that this is not very popular, it may not be ideal in some cases, since certainly since it came out it has had everything but massive adoption, maybe due to problems in some cases. If you see anomalies in how it works and it doesn't fix by tweaking the memory, it's better to disable the lucidlogix technology than anything else. A warning just in case.

Another advantage of this technology is that it allows the use of the dedicated hardware of the intel gpu for video compression, a hardware that seems to be very fast, another thing you can do with this software you mentioned, use intel video compression and continue using the 3D graphics simultaneously for powerful things.