@krampak said in Considering a NAS for storage, backup, VPN, Plex:
@_Neptunno_ said in Considering a NAS for storage, backup, VPN, Plex:
but keep in mind that the larger the size, the longer it takes to rebuild a volume in case of a failure and the more risks you have that during that reconstruction the system will fail again and you'll be left with a broken system.
But we're talking about hours, right? What are the probabilities? I've had to replace a couple of disks in RAID5 servers and it's been very convenient. What does decrease the performance while it's doing the reconstruction, at least in my case.
Well, as I mentioned, it depends a lot on the size of the Raid 5 and to a lesser extent on the type of disks and the controller itself. The truth is that it's a topic to talk about at length, I think a Raid 5 is a good solution although you should also consider the server where it's mounted and the model of the disks.
I say this because in small companies or some local administration, for not investing money in a good server and disks for that environment, a raid 5 can give some problems since during the reconstruction time users continue working and they notice that slowdown of the system... and for the administrator it's a pain because it can take hours during which you know that if another disk fails, you're in big trouble.
The issue of disks seems trivial but in the long run I realize it's fundamental, sometimes those disks stop working in raid but in normal mode they don't give problems. With a raid 1, if that disk fails, you can even plug it into another machine and access that information. I'm talking about typical disks like WD blue, or green... it's not the same as the red ones, to give an example.
But in the case of the equipment we set up in my company, they are digital preservation systems and they handle many Terabytes of information, so to rebuild a Raid 5 of 20-40TB (just to give an example) is crazy for Raid5. I think what my colleagues do is make smaller groups in raid 5 and avoid having to spend several days on reconstruction.
I'm not saying a Raid 5 is bad, maybe I'm explaining myself wrong, but I mean that there are certain conditions that can be a bit of a pain... having a backup shouldn't be a problem even if you have a total loss of the raid.
But I'm talking more at the level of a home or small business or organization, where a raid 1 of 2 or 4TB disks plus two other disks aside in a server for copies save you more than enough... of course the performance offered by the 5 is a plus to consider and more if you have many users working.
In short, I think it's important to see what you need in each circumstance since there are people who prioritize performance, space, security and above all money.
Sorry for the long post!!



Once we reach that catastrophic point, the fact that "only" had to be rebuilt would be the least of my worries; not losing the information would be enough for me to be happy. Thanks for the clarification.